Orientation dependent detectability of fiber-like signals in linear iterative image reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis

We characterize the detectability of fiber-like signals in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for linear iterative image reconstruction (IIR) algorithms. The detectability is investigated as a function of signal orientation and IIR regularization strength. The detectability is computed with a region-of-interest (ROI) Hotelling observer (HO) and applied to two linear IIR algorithms. Trends in detectability are compared with conspicuity of signals reconstructed in both simulation and real data studies. A common trend is observed with both algorithms in which signals oriented parallel to the detector and the plane containing the source-trajectory have lower detectability than their orthogonal counterparts at low regularization strengths. The orientation dependence is gradually reduced with increasing regularization strength. These trends in detectability are seen to match well with trends in the conspicuity of reconstructed signals in both simulation and real data studies.

[1]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[2]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[3]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Investigating simulation‐based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2017, Medical physics.

[4]  Heang-Ping Chan,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views. , 2014, Radiology.

[5]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantitative imaging in breast tomosynthesis and CT: comparison of detection and estimation task performance. , 2010, Medical physics.

[6]  Grace J Gang,et al.  Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  Aldo Badano,et al.  A statistical, task-based evaluation method for three-dimensional x-ray breast imaging systems using variable-background phantoms. , 2010, Medical physics.

[8]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  A virtual trial framework for quantifying the detectability of masses in breast tomosynthesis projection data. , 2013, Medical physics.

[9]  Colleen H. Neal,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  J. Baker,et al.  Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis. , 2009, Radiology.

[11]  R M Nishikawa,et al.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise. , 2010, Medical physics.

[12]  Emil Y. Sidky,et al.  Use of the Hotelling observer to optimize image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[13]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[14]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[15]  Bo Zhao,et al.  A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2007, Medical physics.

[16]  Otto Zhou,et al.  Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system. , 2013, Medical physics.

[17]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space. , 2009, Medical physics.

[18]  Rongping Zeng,et al.  Evaluating the sensitivity of the optimization of acquisition geometry to the choice of reconstruction algorithm in digital breast tomosynthesis through a simulation study. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  John M. Boone,et al.  Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions. , 2011, Medical physics.