Intuitive Prosociality

Prosocial behavior is a central feature of human life and a major focus of research across the natural and social sciences. Most theoretical models of prosociality share a common assumption: Humans are instinctively selfish, and prosocial behavior requires exerting reflective control over these basic instincts. However, findings from several scientific disciplines have recently contradicted this view. Rather than requiring control over instinctive selfishness, prosocial behavior appears to stem from processes that are intuitive, reflexive, and even automatic. These observations suggest that our understanding of prosociality should be revised to include the possibility that, in many cases, prosocial behavior—instead of requiring active control over our impulses—represents an impulse of its own.

[1]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[2]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. , 1973 .

[3]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[4]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Automatic and controlled processing revisited. , 1984, Psychological review.

[5]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  A Neostriatal Habit Learning System in Humans , 1996, Science.

[6]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[7]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. , 1999, Psychological review.

[8]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[9]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[10]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  M. Hauser,et al.  Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Colin Camerer,et al.  “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  J. Gross,et al.  The cognitive control of emotion , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The Neural Signature of Social Norm Compliance , 2007, Neuron.

[17]  J. Hamlin,et al.  Social evaluation by preverbal infants , 2007, Nature.

[18]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Depletion Makes the Heart Grow Less Helpful: Helping as a Function of Self-Regulatory Energy and Genetic Relatedness , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  F. D. de Waal Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  S. Bryson,et al.  Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative framework. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Varieties of altruism in children and chimpanzees , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Luca Passamonti,et al.  A Key Role for Similarity in Vicarious Reward , 2009, Science.

[23]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  Daniel T. Knoepfle,et al.  Value Computations in Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Charitable Decision Making Incorporate Input from Regions Involved in Social Cognition , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences , 2010, Nature.

[26]  E. Fehr,et al.  Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Are Social Value Orientations Expressed Automatically? Decision Making in the Dictator Game on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[28]  W. Güth,et al.  Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints , 2011 .

[29]  John A. List,et al.  The Market for Charitable Giving , 2011 .

[30]  K. Ochsner,et al.  The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Alex Shaw,et al.  Young Children Are More Generous When Others Are Aware of Their Actions , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  A. Shaw,et al.  Children discard a resource to avoid inequity. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Kimberly L. Ray,et al.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions , 2012, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  T. Singer,et al.  Impulse Control and Underlying Functions of the Left DLPFC Mediate Age-Related and Age-Independent Individual Differences in Strategic Social Behavior , 2012, Neuron.

[35]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[36]  A. Simmons,et al.  Neural basis of egalitarian behavior , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  P. Harris,et al.  I Should but I Won’t: Why Young Children Endorse Norms of Fair Sharing but Do Not Follow Them , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  David G. Rand,et al.  Why We Cooperate , 2014 .

[39]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex co-varies with revealed social preferences: evidence for person-invariant value. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[40]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[41]  Verena Utikal,et al.  Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load , 2014 .