The organization of the neonatal rat's brainstem trigeminal complex and its role in the formation of central trigeminal patterns

The present study delimits the relationship of primary trigeminal afferents to their targets, the brainstem trigeminal nuclei of the neonatal rat. Previously, the brainstem trigeminal complex of the rat has been subdivided on the basis of either cytoarchitectonics or patterns of succinic dehydrogenase activity into the principal sensory nucleus and the three subnuclei of the spinal trigeminal nucleus, oralis, interpolaris, and caudalis. In this paper, we demonstrate that each of these subdivisions can also be identified by its pattern of primary trigeminal afferents. In addition, we demonstrate that the terminations of these afferents are distributed in a punctate fashion which correlates with vibrissae‐related patterns of histochemical staining. Further, vibrissae removal in the neonatal rat at any age studied results in a corresponding deafferentation of both the principal sensory nucleus and all subnuclei of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. This same procedure has a graded, age‐dependent effect on the vibrissae‐related pattern of cytochrome oxidase staining in somatosensory cortex. On this basis, we conclude that vibrissae‐related pattern formation in the central trigeminal system can be best understood in terms of a single “sensitive” period for the entire system. We hypothesize that this is the period during which an interaction normally occurs between primary trigeminal afferents and target neurons of the principal sensory nucleus.

[1]  B. Cragg,et al.  The effect of destroying the whisker follicles in mice on the sensory nerve, the thalamocortical radiation and cortical barrel development , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  J. Arvidsson.  Somatotopic organization of vibrissae afferents in the trigeminal sensorynuclei of the rat studied by transganglionic transport of HRP , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  K. Åström.  On the Central Course of Afferent Fibres in the Trigeminal, Facial, Glossopharyngeal, and Vagal Nerves and their Nuclei in the Mouse. , 1953 .

[4]  D. Jeanmonod,et al.  Mouse somatosensory cortex: Alterations in the barrelfield following receptor injury at different early postnatal ages , 1981, Neuroscience.

[5]  H. Killackey,et al.  Vibrissae representation in subcortical trigeminal centers of the neonatal rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  S. Nord,et al.  Somatotopic organization in the spinal trigeminal nucleus, the dorsal column nuclei and related structures in the rat , 1967, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  R S Erzurumlu,et al.  Efferent connections of the brainstem trigeminal complex with the facial nucleus of the rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  H. Loos.  Barreloids in mouse somatosensory thalamus , 1976, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  H. Killackey,et al.  Trigeminal projections to the superior colliculus of the rat , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  S. B. Vincent,et al.  The tactile hair of the white rat , 1913 .

[11]  T. Woolsey,et al.  Effects of neonatal whisker lesions on mouse central trigeminal pathways , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  J. Olszewski,et al.  On the anatomical and functional organization of the spinal trigeminal nucleus , 1950, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  R L Smith,et al.  The ascending fiber projections from the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus in the rat , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Central projections of the normal and ‘regenerate’ infraorbital nerve in adult rats subjected to neonatal unilateral infraorbital lesions: a transganglionic horseradish peroxidase study , 1983, Brain Research.

[15]  M. Wong-Riley,et al.  Histochemical changes in cytochrome oxidase of cortical barrels after vibrissal removal in neonatal and adult mice. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  T. Woolsey,et al.  Areal changes in mouse cortical barrels following vibrissal damage at different postnatal ages , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  P. Waite.  Rearrangement of neuronal responses in the trigeminal system of the rat following peripheral nerve section. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  W. Armstrong,et al.  Organization of the facial nucleus in the rat. , 1982, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[19]  H. Killackey,et al.  Ephemeral cellular segmentation in the thalamus of the neonatal rat. , 1981, Brain research.

[20]  M. Peschanski,et al.  Trigeminal afferents to the diencephalon in the rat , 1984, Neuroscience.

[21]  W. Falls.  Termination in trigeminal nucleus oralis of ascending intratrigeminal axons originating from neurons in the medullary dorsal horn: an HRP study in the rat employing light and electron microscopy , 1984, Brain Research.

[22]  T. Woolsey,et al.  A proportional relationship between peripheral innervation density and cortical neuron number in the somatosensory system of the mouse , 1975, Brain Research.

[23]  N. Mizuno,et al.  Application of coupled oxidation reaction to electron microscopic demonstration of horseradish peroxidase: cobalt-glucose oxidase method , 1979, Brain Research.

[24]  H. Killackey,et al.  Distinguishing topography and somatotopy in the thalamocortical projections of the developing rat. , 1985, Brain research.

[25]  R. Switzer,et al.  Trigeminal projections to cerebellar tactile areas in the rat-origin mainly from n. interpolaris and n. principalis , 1978, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  S. Hockfield,et al.  An anatomical demonstration of projections to the medullary dorsal horn (trigeminal nucleus caudalis) from rostral trigeminal nuclei and the contralateral caudal medulla , 1982, Brain Research.

[27]  H. Killackey,et al.  The formation of afferent patterns in the somatosensory cortex of the neonatal rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  H. Killackey,et al.  Central correlates of peripheral pattern alterations in the trigeminal system of the rat. III. Neurons of the principal sensory nucleus. , 1982, Brain research.

[29]  Thomas A. Woolsey,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic correlates of the vibrissae in the medullary trigeminal complex of the mouse , 1984, Brain Research.

[30]  H. Killackey,et al.  Fine structural survey of the rat's brainstem sensory trigeminal complex , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  H. Killackey.  Anatomical evidence for cortical subdivisions based on vertically discrete thalamic projections from the ventral posterior nucleus to cortical barrels in the rat. , 1973, Brain research.

[32]  D. Simons,et al.  Morphology of Golgi‐Cox‐impregnated barrel neurons in rat SmI cortex , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[33]  F. W. Kerr,et al.  Organization of trigeminothalamic tracts and other thalamic afferent systems of the brainstem in the rat: Presence of gelatinosa neurons with thalamic connections , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  J. K. Harting,et al.  Studies of the principal sensory and spinal trigeminal nuclei of the rat: Projections to the superior colliculus, inferior olive, and cerebellum , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[35]  H. Killackey,et al.  Diencephalic projections of the subnucleus interpolaris of the brainstem trigeminal complex in the rat , 1980, Neuroscience.

[36]  H. Killackey,et al.  The development of vibrissae representation in subcortical trigeminal centers of the neonatal rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  H. Killackey,et al.  The sensitive period in the development of the trigeminal system of the neonatal rat , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[38]  S. G. Nord.  Receptor field characteristics of single cells in the rat spinal trigeminal complex. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[39]  H. Killackey,et al.  Anomalous organization of thalamocortical projections consequent to vibrissae removal in the newborn rat and mouse , 1976, Brain Research.

[40]  R S Erzurumlu,et al.  Development of order in the rat trigeminal system , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  H. Killackey,et al.  Differential organization of thalamic projection cells in the brain stem trigeminal complex of the rat , 1980, Brain Research.

[42]  W. Falls.  A Golgi type II neuron in trigeminal nucleus oralis: A Golgi study in the rat , 1983, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  M. Wong-Riley.  Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry , 1979, Brain Research.

[44]  T. Woolsey,et al.  Somatosensory Cortex: Structural Alterations following Early Injury to Sense Organs , 1973, Science.

[45]  T A Woolsey,et al.  Effects of early vibrissae damage on neurons in the ventrobasal (VB) thalamus of the mouse , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[46]  A. Torvik,et al.  Afferent connections to the sensory trigeminal nuclei, the nucleus of the solitary tract and adjacent structures. An experimental study in the rat , 1956, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[47]  Haruhide Hayashi,et al.  Distributions of vibrissae afferent fiber collaterals in the trigeminal nuclei as revealed by intra-axonal injection of horseradish peroxidase , 1980, Brain Research.

[48]  J. M. Gibson,et al.  Trigeminocerebellar mossy fiber branching to granule cell layer patches in the rat cerebellum , 1981, Brain Research.

[49]  C. Matesz.  Termination areas of primary afferent fibers of the trigeminal nerve in the rat. , 1983, Acta biologica Hungarica.

[50]  D. Reis,et al.  Projections from the spinal trigeminal nucleus to the entire length of the spinal cord in the rat , 1981, Brain Research.

[51]  R. Lund,et al.  Thalamic afferents from the spinal cord and trigeminal nuclei. An experimental anatomical study in the rat. , 1967, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[52]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (S I) of mouse cerebral cortex , 1970 .