Recursive subspace model identification algorithms for slowly time-varying systems in closed loop

This paper concerns subspace model identification of slowly time-varying systems operating in closed loop. Recursive MOESP-type closed loop subspace model identification algorithms are developed. The key technique of derivation of the proposed algorithms is the Hessenberg QR algorithm. Two forgetting mechanisms, namely, the exponential weight and the sliding data window, are introduced in order to track the time variation of the parameters of the systems. Numerical studies on a closed loop identification problem show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

[1]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Consistency analysis of some closed-loop subspace identification methods , 2005, Autom..

[2]  M. Verhaegen.  Subspace model identification Part 2. Analysis of the elementary output-error state-space model identification algorithm , 1992 .

[3]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[4]  Hidenori Kimura,et al.  Recursive 4SID algorithms using gradient type subspace tracking , 2002, Autom..

[5]  M. Verhaegen,et al.  A fast, recursive MIMO state space model identification algorithm , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Identification of the deterministic part of MIMO state space models given in innovations form from input-output data , 1994, Autom..

[7]  Hiroshi Oku,et al.  Direct subspace model identification of LTI systems operating in closed-loop , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[8]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Recursive subspace identification of linear and non-linear Wiener state-space models , 2000, Autom..

[9]  Patrick Dewilde,et al.  Subspace model identification Part 1. The output-error state-space model identification class of algorithms , 1992 .

[10]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Application of a subspace model identification technique to identify LTI systems operating in closed-loop , 1993, Autom..

[11]  Manfred Deistler,et al.  Statistical analysis of novel subspace identification methods , 1996, Signal Process..

[12]  Magnus Jansson,et al.  Subspace Identification and ARX Modeling , 2003 .

[13]  Akira Ohsumi,et al.  RECURSIVE 4 SID-BASED IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHM WITH FIXED INPUT-OUTPUT DATA SIZE , 2005 .

[14]  Hiroshi Oku,et al.  MOESP-type Closed-loop Subspace Model Identification Method , 2006 .

[15]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[16]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Consistency analysis of closed-loop subspace identification , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[17]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[18]  Giorgio Picci,et al.  Subspace identification of closed loop systems by the orthogonal decomposition method , 2005, Autom..

[19]  Paul M. J. Van den Hof,et al.  An indirect method for transfer function estimation from closed loop data , 1993, Autom..

[20]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System identification (2nd ed.): theory for the user , 1999 .

[21]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Fast recursive identification of state space models via exploitation of displacement structure , 1994, Autom..

[22]  Alessandro Chiuso.  Asymptotic variance of closed-loop subspace identification methods , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.