Identifiability in Blind Deconvolution With Subspace or Sparsity Constraints

Blind deconvolution (BD), the resolution of a signal and a filter given their convolution, arises in many applications. Without further constraints, BD is ill-posed. In practice, subspace or sparsity constraints have been imposed to reduce the search space, and have shown some empirical success. However, the existing theoretical analysis on uniqueness in BD is rather limited. In an effort to address the still open question, we derive sufficient conditions under which two vectors can be uniquely identified from their circular convolution, subject to subspace or sparsity constraints. These sufficient conditions provide the first algebraic sample complexities for BD. We first derive a sufficient condition that applies to almost all bases or frames. For BD of vectors in ℂn, with two subspace constraints of dimensions m1 and m2, the required sample complexity is n ≥ m1m2. Then, we impose a sub-band structure on one basis, and derive a sufficient condition that involves a relaxed sample complexity n≥ m1+m2-1, which we show to be optimal. We present the extensions of these results to BD with sparsity constraints or mixed constraints, with the sparsity level replacing the subspace dimension. The cost for the unknown support in this case is an extra factor of 2 in the sample complexity.

[1]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Blind deconvolution using a normalized sparsity measure , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[2]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  Self-calibration and biconvex compressive sensing , 2015, ArXiv.

[3]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Junge,et al.  Stability in blind deconvolution of sparse signals and reconstruction by alternating minimization , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA).

[5]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Uniqueness conditions for low-rank matrix recovery , 2011, SPIE Proceedings.

[6]  Yuejie Chi,et al.  Guaranteed Blind Sparse Spikes Deconvolution via Lifting and Convex Optimization , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[7]  Sunav Choudhary,et al.  On identifiability in bilinear inverse problems , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[8]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Total variation blind deconvolution , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  Öz Yilmaz,et al.  Society of Exploration Geophysicists video course : seismic data processing , 1990 .

[10]  Subhasis Chaudhuri,et al.  Blind Image Deconvolution , 2014, Springer International Publishing.

[11]  Karim Abed-Meraim,et al.  Blind system identification , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[12]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Blind reconstruction of sparse images with unknown point spread function , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  PhaseLift: Exact and Stable Signal Recovery from Magnitude Measurements via Convex Programming , 2011, ArXiv.

[14]  Yanjun Li,et al.  A Unified Framework for Identifiability Analysis in Bilinear Inverse Problems with Applications to Subspace and Sparsity Models , 2015, ArXiv.

[15]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  FIR perfect signal reconstruction from multiple convolutions: minimum deconvolver orders , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[16]  Sunav Choudhary,et al.  Sparse blind deconvolution: What cannot be done , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[17]  Yanjun Li,et al.  Blind Recovery of Sparse Signals From Subsampled Convolution , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Subspace methods for the blind identification of multichannel FIR filters , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  M. Salman Asif,et al.  Random channel coding and blind deconvolution , 2009, 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[20]  S. M. Doherty,et al.  Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data , 2000 .

[21]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Blind Deconvolution Using Convex Programming , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[22]  Sunav Choudhary,et al.  Identifiability Scaling Laws in Bilinear Inverse Problems , 2014, ArXiv.

[23]  Mohammad Havaei,et al.  Blind Channel Equalization , 2012, ArXiv.

[24]  Jean-Christophe Pesquet,et al.  Euclid in a Taxicab: Sparse Blind Deconvolution with Smoothed ${\ell _1}/{\ell _2}$ Regularization , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.