Critical Review and Methodological Approach to Evaluate the Differences Among International Green Building Rating Tools

Abstract Building performances play a fundamental role in the worldwide energy scenario. In the last years, many countries have developed certification procedures in order to rate the environmental sustainability of buildings, aiming at reducing energy consumptions and environmental impacts during the construction, management and operational phases of a building. This study firstly provides an overview of the different certification procedures employed in several countries all over the world, considering also which Green Building Rating System (GBRS) is only applied in its own country and which one is developed in other countries by means of proper adaptations. Five widespread and well known green building rating systems (CASBEE, Green Star, BREEAM, LEED and ITACA) are then analyzed in detail and differences and similarities among them are highlighted. To this aim, six new macro-areas (site, water, energy, comfort and safety, materials and outdoor quality) are defined and a normalization procedure is implemented, in order to provide significant information about the sustainability aspects taken into account in the different rating tools and aiming at comparing them. This comparison allows to identify the main features of the five tools and to highlight qualitative and quantitative differences. The analysis shows that the certification tools are not homogeneous from both points of view. The aim of this work is to understand which issues have more influence on the final performance rate of each system and to give to final users a deeper knowledge of the aspects included in these tools.

[1]  Maija Križmane,et al.  Key Criteria Across Existing Sustainable Building Rating Tools , 2016 .

[2]  Po-Han Chen,et al.  A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis , 2017 .

[3]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  Improvement of the Sustainability of Existing School Buildings According to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) ® Protocol: A Case Study in Italy , 2013 .

[4]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review , 2014 .

[5]  Appu Haapio,et al.  Towards sustainable urban communities , 2012 .

[6]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools , 2015 .

[7]  Rouzbeh Shad,et al.  Developing an Iranian green building assessment tool using decision making methods and geographical information system: Case study in Mashhad city , 2017 .

[8]  Claudia Guattari,et al.  Design criteria for improving insulation effectiveness of multilayer walls , 2016 .

[9]  Paola Gori,et al.  A step towards the optimization of the indoor luminous environment by genetic algorithms , 2017 .

[10]  Peter McGregor,et al.  Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability , 2009 .

[11]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings of the Lombardy Region (Italy), a Case Study of High-Energy Performance Buildings , 2013 .

[12]  Hikmat H. Ali,et al.  Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan , 2009 .

[13]  Patxi Hernandez,et al.  Energy demands and potential savings in European office buildings: Case studies based on EnergyPlus simulations , 2013 .

[14]  Ali GhaffarianHoseini,et al.  Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: a review of current theories, implementations and challenges , 2013 .

[15]  Claudia Guattari,et al.  In Situ Thermal Transmittance Measurements for Investigating Differences between Wall Models and Actual Building Performance , 2015 .

[16]  Ferdinando Salata,et al.  Evaluation of Different Urban Microclimate Mitigation Strategies through a PMV Analysis , 2015 .

[17]  J. Klemeš.  Assessing and measuring environmental impact and sustainability , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[18]  Luca Evangelisti,et al.  Influence of Insulating Materials on Green Building Rating System Results , 2016 .

[19]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  International Comparison of Sustainable Rating Tools , 2009 .

[20]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  The development of sustainable assessment method for Saudi Arabia built environment: weighting system , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[21]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools , 2017 .

[22]  Liyin Shen,et al.  A comparative analysis of waste management requirements between five green building rating systems for new residential buildings , 2016 .

[23]  John Tookey,et al.  A critical comparison of green building rating systems , 2017 .

[24]  Francesco Leccese,et al.  Energy demand analysis and energy labelling of new residential buildings in Tuscany (Italy) , 2009 .

[25]  Joseph Iwaro,et al.  Modeling the performance of residential building envelope: The role of sustainable energy performanc , 2011 .

[26]  Ozge Suzer,et al.  A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings , 2015 .

[28]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[29]  U. Berardi.  Sustainability assessments of buildings, communities, and cities , 2015 .

[30]  Luca Evangelisti,et al.  Energy Retrofit Strategies for Residential Building Envelopes: An Italian Case Study of an Early-50s Building , 2015 .

[31]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Windows thermal resistance: Infrared thermography aided comparative analysis among finite volumes simulations and experimental methods , 2014 .

[32]  Vittal S. Anantatmula,et al.  Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction , 2011 .

[33]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[34]  Ferdinando Salata,et al.  A Methodological Comparison between Energy and Environmental Performance Evaluation , 2015 .

[35]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[36]  Khaled Galal,et al.  Integrated LCA–LEED sustainability assessment model for structure and envelope systems of school buildings , 2014 .

[37]  Ezanee Mohamed Elias,et al.  A Comparison of the Green Building's Criteria , 2014 .

[38]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  On the Integration of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)® ND Protocol with the Energy Planning and Management Tools in Italy: Strengths and Weaknesses , 2013 .

[39]  E. M. Aboul-Zahab,et al.  Development of an energy efficiency rating system for existing buildings using Analytic Hierarchy Process – The case of Egypt , 2017 .

[40]  Ana Rita Neves,et al.  Energy sustainability indicators for local energy planning: Review of current practices and derivation of a new framework , 2010 .

[41]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper , 2012 .

[42]  Baruch Givoni,et al.  Outdoor comfort research issues , 2003 .

[43]  Wenjuan Wei,et al.  Indoor air quality requirements in green building certifications , 2015 .

[44]  Hasim Altan,et al.  Comparative Review of Five Sustainable Rating Systems , 2011 .

[45]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Sustainable Construction : Green Building Design and Delivery , 2005 .

[46]  Tatsuo Oka,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF BREEAM, LEED, GBTOOL AND CASBEE , 2005 .

[47]  Fabio Nardecchia,et al.  How temperature affects the airflow around a single-block isolated building , 2016 .

[48]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Inter-building effect: Simulating the impact of a network of buildings on the accuracy of building energy performance predictions , 2012 .

[49]  Fabio Bisegna,et al.  A matrix approach to identify and choose efficient strategies to develop the Smart Campus , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC).