Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion

Presently available simplified analytical methods and semi-empirical methods for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to fault motion are suitable only for the strike-slip and the normal-slip type fault motions, and cannot be used for the reverse fault crossing case. A simple finite element model, which uses beam elements for the pipeline and discrete nonlinear springs for the soil, has been proposed to analyse buried pipeline subjected to reverse fault motion. The material nonlinearities associated with pipe-material and soil, and geometric nonlinearity associated with large deformations were incorporated in the analysis. Complex reverse fault motion was simulated using suitable constraints between pipe-nodes and ground ends of the soil spring. Results of the parametric study suggest that the pipeline's capacity to accommodate reverse fault offset can be increased significantly by choosing a near-parallel orientation in plan with respect to the fault line. Further improvement in the response of the pipeline is possible by adopting loose backfill, smooth and hard surface coating, and shallow burial depth in the fault crossing region. For normal or near normal orientations, pipeline is expected to fail due to beam buckling at very small fault offsets.

[1]  Spyros A. Karamanos,et al.  Finite element analysis of buried steel pipelines under strike-slip fault displacements , 2010 .

[2]  H. E. Stewart,et al.  Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting , 2009 .

[3]  J. McCalpin,et al.  2001 Bhuj-Kachchh earthquake: surface faulting and its relation with neotectonics and regional structures, Gujarat, Western India , 2003 .

[4]  A P Moser,et al.  Buried Pipe Design , 1990 .

[5]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  A case study of damages of the Kandla Port and Customs Office tower supported on a mat–pile foundation in liquefied soils under the 2001 Bhuj earthquake , 2009 .

[6]  Jianwen Liang,et al.  Site Effects on Seismic Behavior of Pipelines: A Review , 2000 .

[7]  Michael J. O'Rouke,et al.  Response of buried pipelines subject to earthquake effects , 1999 .

[8]  Oleg V. Trifonov,et al.  A semi-analytical approach to a nonlinear stress–strain analysis of buried steel pipelines crossing active faults , 2010 .

[9]  Yun Wook Choo,et al.  Remediation for buried pipeline systems under permanent ground deformation , 2007 .

[10]  S Bhattacharya Design Of Foundations In Seismic Areas: Principles And Applications , 2007 .

[11]  Katsumi Fukuda,et al.  A new proposal for simplified design of buried steel pipes crossing active faults , 2001 .

[12]  George P. Kouretzis,et al.  Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings , 2007 .

[13]  Leon Ru-Liang Wang,et al.  A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement , 1985 .

[14]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Bending–buckling interaction as a failure mechanism of piles in liquefiable soils , 2010 .

[15]  Jiin-Song Tsai,et al.  Damage to buried water supply pipelines in the chichi (Taiwan) earthquake and apreliminary evaluation of seismic resistance of pipe joints , 2000 .

[16]  Stelios Kyriakides,et al.  On the beam and shell modes of buckling of buried pipelines , 1990 .

[17]  Rp Kennedy,et al.  Fault Movement Effects on Buried Oil Pipeline , 1977 .

[18]  J. Malik,et al.  Active faults and related Late Quaternary deformation along the Northwestern Himalayan Frontal Zone, India , 2003 .