Age differences in online social networking - A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace

The aim of this research was to investigate age differences and similarities in the use of the social networking website MySpace, to explore potential differences in social capital among older people (users over 60 years of age) compared to teenagers (users between 13 and 19 years of age). We used locally developed web crawlers to collect data from MySpace's user profile pages, and to quantify any differences that exist in the networks of friends of older people and teenagers. Content analysis was applied to investigate differences in social activities between the two age groups on MySpace, and the way they represent themselves on their profile pages. Our findings show a social capital divide: teenagers have larger networks of friends compared to older users of MySpace. On the other hand, we found that the majority of teenage users' friends are in their own age range (age+/-2 years), whilst older people's networks of friends tend to have a more diverse age distribution. In addition, our results show that teenagers tend to make more use of different media (e.g. video, music) within MySpace and use more self-references and negative emotions when describing themselves on their profile compared to older people.

[1]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[2]  Kyung-Hee Kim,et al.  Cying for Me, Cying for Us: Relational Dialectics in a Korean Social Network Site , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  N. Ellison,et al.  Spatially Bounded Online Social Networks and Social Capital: The Role of Facebook , 2006 .

[4]  Tomoko Kanayama,et al.  Ethnographic Research on the Experience of Japanese Elderly People Online , 2003, New Media Soc..

[5]  Michael Wurst,et al.  Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Communities Based on Mapping Implicit Knowledge , 2004, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[6]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  Weblogs as a bridging genre , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[7]  J. P. Djajadiningrat,et al.  Disintermediating the PC: a product centric view on Web 2.0 , 2007, DPPI.

[8]  Bo Xie,et al.  Older Chinese, the Internet, and Well-Being , 2007, Care Management Journals.

[9]  D. Boyd Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[10]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  A systematic approach to the development of research-based web design guidelines for older people , 2007, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[11]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Trends, similarities, and differences in the usage of teen and senior public online newsgroups , 2006, TCHI.

[12]  P. K. Smith,et al.  Grandparents use of new communication technologies in a European perspective , 2005, European journal of ageing.

[13]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Louis Leung,et al.  Net-Generation Attributes and Seductive Properties of the Internet as Predictors of Online Activities and Internet Addiction , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Patterns of empathy in online communication , 2007, CHI.

[16]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  The network communities of SeniorNet , 1999, ECSCW.

[17]  J. Alison Bryant,et al.  IMing, Text Messaging, and Adolescent Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Research-derived web design guidelines for older people , 2005, Assets '05.

[19]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[20]  F. Requena,et al.  Social Capital, Satisfaction and Quality of Life in the Workplace , 2003 .

[21]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[22]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[23]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  Bridging the gap: a genre analysis of Weblogs , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[24]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[25]  D. Buckingham Youth, Identity, and Digital Media , 2007 .

[26]  N. Lin,et al.  Social structure and network analysis , 1985 .

[27]  Jay Lundell,et al.  Catalyzing social interaction with ubiquitous computing: a needs assessment of elders coping with cognitive decline , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[28]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Support and Connectedness: The Needs of Women Distance Education Students , 1990 .

[29]  S. Herring,et al.  Women and Children Last: The Discursive Construction of Weblogs , 2004 .

[30]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people , 2002, Assets '02.

[31]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Leon G. Schiffman,et al.  Cybersenior Empowerment: How Some Older Individuals Are Taking Control of Their Lives , 2002 .