Waiting list management: priority criteria or first-in first-out? A case for total joint replacement.

BACKGROUND Total joint replacements are interventions with large waiting times from indication to the surgery management. These patients can be managed in two ways; first-in first-out or through a priority tool. The aim of this study was to compare real time on waiting list (TWL) with a priority criteria score, developed by our team, in patients awaiting joint replacement due to osteoarthritis. METHODS Consecutive patients placed on waiting list were eligible. Patients fulfilled a questionnaire which included items of our priority tool and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) specific questionnaire. Other priority items were extracted from the clinical history. The priority tool gives a score from 0 to 100 points, and three categories (urgent, preferent and ordinary). We studied the differences among categories and TWL by means of one-way analysis of variance. Correlational analysis was used to evaluate association among priority score and TWL and WOMAC baseline and gains at 6 months with priority score and TWL. RESULTS We have studied 684 patients. Women represented 62% of sample. The mean age was 70 years. There were not association between the categories of priority score and TWL (P = 0.12). The rho correlation coefficient between TWL and priority score was -0.11. Among baseline WOMAC scores and priority score, the rho coefficients were 0.79, 0.7 and 0.52 with function, pain and stiffness dimensions, respectively. There were differences in the mean scores of WOMAC dimensions according to the three priority categories (P < 0.001) but no with TWL categories. Data of gains in both health-related quality of life dimensions at 6 months were similar, with differences according to priority categories but no regarding TWL. CONCLUSIONS The results of the study support the necessity of implementing a prioritization system instead of the actual system if we want to manage the waiting list for joint replacement with clinical equity.

[1]  B. Masri,et al.  Delays Worsen Quality of Life Outcome of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  A. Bilbao,et al.  Development of explicit criteria for prioritization of hip and knee replacement. , 2007, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[3]  C D Naylor,et al.  The burden of waiting for hip and knee replacements in Ontario. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team. , 1997, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[4]  J. M. Valderas,et al.  Opiniones, vivencias y percepciones de los ciudadanos en torno a las listas de espera para cirugía electiva de catarata y artroplastia de cadera y rodilla , 2004 .

[5]  A. Bilbao,et al.  Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. , 2002, Clinical rheumatology.

[6]  Robert L Kane,et al.  The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Olivier Ethgen,et al.  Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  D C Hadorn,et al.  The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview , 1997, BMJ.

[9]  A. Nilsdotter,et al.  Age and waiting time as predictors of outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[10]  I. Arostegui,et al.  Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  T. Noseworthy,et al.  Prioritization of patients on scheduled waiting lists: validation of a scoring system for hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2004, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[12]  C. Palmer,et al.  Quality-of-life improvement compared after hip and knee replacement. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  C. Naylor,et al.  Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority. , 1996, Quality in health care : QHC.

[14]  I. Arostegui,et al.  Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  D. Hadorn,et al.  Developing priority criteria for hip and knee replacement: results from the Western Canada Waiting List Project. , 2003, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[16]  A. Bilbao,et al.  Validation of a prioritization tool for patients on the waiting list for total hip and knee replacements. , 2009, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[17]  A. Silman,et al.  Pain, physical functioning and quality of life of individuals awaiting total joint replacement: a longitudinal study. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[18]  B. Coleman,et al.  Does the priority scoring system for joint replacement really identify those in most need? , 2005, The New Zealand medical journal.

[19]  T. Noseworthy,et al.  Determinants of patient and surgeon perspectives on maximum acceptable waiting times for hip and knee arthroplasty , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[20]  Developing priority criteria for general surgery: results from the Western Canada Waiting List Project. , 2002, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[21]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[22]  D. Voaklander,et al.  The impact of health status on waiting time for major joint arthroplasty. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  J. M. Quintana,et al.  Priorización de pacientes en lista de espera para prótesis de rodilla y cadera: la opinión de los pacientes , 2005 .

[24]  E. Batlle-Gualda,et al.  Traducción y adaptación al español del cuestionario WOMAC específico para artrosis de rodilla y cadera , 1999 .

[25]  R. Dittus,et al.  Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. , 1994, JAMA.

[26]  R H Brook,et al.  A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical Technologies , 1986, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[27]  Paul Hansen,et al.  PRIORITIZING PATIENTS FOR ELECTIVE SURGERY , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[28]  S. Hajat,et al.  Does waiting for total hip replacement matter? Prospective cohort study , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[29]  A. Bilbao,et al.  Validation of the Spanish Version of the WOMAC Questionnaire for Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis , 2002, Clinical Rheumatology.

[30]  I. Arostegui,et al.  Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[31]  H. Sintonen,et al.  Evaluating waiting time effect on health outcomes at admission: a prospective randomized study on patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. , 2007, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[32]  D. Voaklander,et al.  Equity in waiting times for major joint arthroplasty. , 2002, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.