This paper presents numerical analysis of an airfoil geometry inspired by the down coat of the night owl. The objective is to understand the mechanisms of airfoil trailing edge noise reduction that has been observed with such designs in previous experiments. The NACA 0012 airfoil is selected as the baseline airfoil. The bioinspired geometry consists of an array of “finlets” that are applied near the trailing edge of the baseline airfoil and are aligned with the flow direction. Wall-resolved large eddy simulations (LES) are performed over the baseline and the bioinspired airfoil geometries and the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of the two geometries are contrasted. Both models are simulated at chordbased Reynolds number Rec = 5 × 105 , flow Mach number, M∞ = 0.2, and angle of attack, α = 0◦ . The simulations are tripped in order to compare with experiments that are at much higher Rec (of the order of 2 M). Tripping is achieved using a geometryresolved trip wire, placed at x/c = 0.05 from the airfoil leading edge. Comparisons with experimental data show good agreement for aerodynamic pressure coefficient (Cp) distribution for the baseline airfoil. Skin friction coefficient (Cf ) and Cp distributions are also found to compare well with XFOIL results obtained by similarly tripping the boundary layer. Surface pressure spectra comparisons between the baseline and the bioinspired airfoil near the airfoil trailing edge show reductions with the finlets of the order of 3 dB at high frequencies. Two hypotheses of noise reduction mechanisms are investigated: (1) reduction in spanwise correlation length, and (2) increase in source-’scattering edge’ separation distance. The simulations show insignificant difference in spanwise coherence between the two geometries, but clearly show that the finlets lift turbulence eddies away from the airfoil trailing edge hence reducing scattering efficiency. Disciplines Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics | Aerospace Engineering | Structures and Materials Comments This is a manuscript of a proceeding published as Andrew Bodling, Bharat R. Agrawal, Anupam Sharma, Ian Clark, William N. Alexander, and William J. Devenport. (2017) "Numerical Investigation of Bio-Inspired Blade Designs at High Reynolds Numbers for Ultra-Quiet Aircraft and Wind Turbines", 23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2017-3502). DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3502. Posted with permission. Authors Andrew Bodling, Bharat Raj Agrawal, Anupam Sharma, Ian Clark, W. Nathan Alexander, and William Devenport This conference proceeding is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/aere_conf/41 Numerical Investigation of Bioinspired Blade Designs at High Reynolds Numbers for Ultra-Quiet Aircraft and Wind Turbines Andrew Bodling , Bharat Raj Agrawal, Anupam Sharma Department of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 50011. Ian Clark , W. Nathan Alexander, and, William Devenport Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061. This paper presents numerical analysis of an airfoil geometry inspired by the down coat of the night owl. The objective is to understand the mechanisms of airfoil trailing edge noise reduction that has been observed with such designs in previous experiments. The NACA 0012 airfoil is selected as the baseline airfoil. The bioinspired geometry consists of an array of “finlets” that are applied near the trailing edge of the baseline airfoil and are aligned with the flow direction. Wall-resolved large eddy simulations (LES) are performed over the baseline and the bioinspired airfoil geometries and the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of the two geometries are contrasted. Both models are simulated at chordbased Reynolds number Rec = 5 × 10, flow Mach number, M∞ = 0.2, and angle of attack, α = 0◦. The simulations are tripped in order to compare with experiments that are at much higher Rec (of the order of 2 M). Tripping is achieved using a geometry-resolved trip wire, placed at x/c = 0.05 from the airfoil leading edge. Comparisons with experimental data show good agreement for aerodynamic pressure coefficient (Cp) distribution for the baseline airfoil. Skin friction coefficient (Cf) and Cp distributions are also found to compare well with XFOIL results obtained by similarly tripping the boundary layer. Surface pressure spectra *Graduate student, 1200 Howe Hall, Ames IA, 50011. abodling@iastate.edu. AIAA Student Member Ph.D. student, 1200 Howe Hall, Ames IA, 50011. bharatr@iastate.edu. AIAA Student Member.
Assistant Professor, 2341 Howe Hall, Ames, IA, 50011. sharma@iastate.edu. AIAA Senior Member. §Ph.D. student, clarki91@vt.edu. AIAA Student Member. ¶Assistant Professor, alexande@vt.edu. AIAA Member. Professor, McBryde Hall, RM 660E,225 Stanger St., Blacksburg, VA 24061. devenport@vt.edu. AIAA Associate Fellow. 1 of 18 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics comparisons between the baseline and the bioinspired airfoil near the airfoil trailing edge show reductions with the finlets of the order of 3 dB at high frequencies. Two hypotheses of noise reduction mechanisms are investigated: (1) reduction in spanwise correlation length, and (2) increase in source-’scattering edge’ separation distance. The simulations show insignificant difference in spanwise coherence between the two geometries, but clearly show that the finlets lift turbulence eddies away from the airfoil trailing edge hence reducing scattering efficiency.
[1]
Hoar Frost,et al.
Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 0012 Aerofoi ] Section , including the Effects of Upper-Surface Roughness Simulating Hoar Frost
,
1970
.
[2]
T. C. Helvey,et al.
Low Speed Aerodynamics for Ultra-Quiet Flight
,
1972
.
[3]
P. T. Soderman,et al.
Leading edge serrations which reduce the noise of low-speed rotors
,
1973
.
[4]
Paul T. Soderman,et al.
Investigation of Acoustic Effects of Leading-Edge Serrations on Airfoils
,
1974
.
[5]
R. Amiet.
Acoustic radiation from an airfoil in a turbulent stream
,
1975
.
[6]
M. Drela.
XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils
,
1989
.
[7]
David Lyle,et al.
A review of health effects of aircraft noise *
,
1977,
Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.
[8]
W. Passchier,et al.
Noise exposure and public health.
,
2000,
Environmental health perspectives.
[9]
Miguel R. Visbal,et al.
On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes
,
2002
.
[10]
Miguel R. Visbal,et al.
Large-Eddy Simulation on Curvilinear Grids Using Compact Differencing and Filtering Schemes
,
2002
.
[11]
E. Pedersen,et al.
Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise--a dose-response relationship.
,
2004,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12]
E. Lebret,et al.
Aircraft noise around a large international airport and its impact on general health and medication use
,
2004,
Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
[13]
Thierry Maeder,et al.
Reduction of Wind Turbine Noise using Optimized Airfoils and Trailing-Edge Serrations
,
2008
.
[14]
Ennes Sarradj,et al.
Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils
,
2010
.
[15]
Richard D. Sandberg,et al.
Direct numerical simulations of low Reynolds number flow over airfoils with trailing-edge serrations☆
,
2011
.
[16]
Yoseph Bar-Cohen.
Innovation inspired by nature: capabilities, potentials, and challenges
,
2012,
Other Conferences.
[17]
Nigel Peake,et al.
Vortex Noise Reductions from a Flexible Fiber Model of Owl Down
,
2013
.
[18]
N. Peake,et al.
Aerodynamic noise from a poroelastic edge with implications for the silent flight of owls
,
2013,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[19]
A. Farboud,et al.
‘Wind turbine syndrome’: fact or fiction?
,
2013,
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.
[20]
Christophe Schram,et al.
Reduction of airfoil turbulence-impingement noise by means of leading-edge serrations and/or porous materials
,
2013
.
[21]
Justin Jaworski,et al.
Acoustic scattering by finite poroelastic plates
,
2014
.
[22]
Cyril Polacsek,et al.
Airfoil noise reductions through leading edge serrations
,
2015
.
[23]
William J. Devenport,et al.
Bioinspired trailing-edge noise control
,
2015
.
[24]
Bharat Raj Agrawal,et al.
Numerical analysis of aerodynamic noise mitigation via leading edge serrations for a rod–airfoil configuration
,
2016
.
[25]
Matthew Szoke.
Trailing edge noise control using active flow control methods
,
2019
.