Outcome measures to assess walking ability following stroke: a systematic review of the literature

Abstract Objectives The recovery of independent walking is an important goal in stroke rehabilitation. The objective of this systematic review was to identify all outcome measures used in the stroke research literature that included an evaluation of walking ability and evaluate the concepts contained in these measures with reference to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Data sources Searches were conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases for the time period January 1990–December 2005 using appropriate keywords. Review methods Studies were selected for further analysis if they used one or more standardized outcome measure incorporating an aspect of walking defined by the ICF. The outcome measure had to have published psychometric properties and specifically measure walking rather than mobility. The content of each outcome measure was classified with reference to the ICF subcategories for walking. The number of times each outcome measure was used was calculated. Results Three hundred and fifty-seven studies met the selection criteria. Sixty-one different outcome measures were used a total of 848 times to measure walking ability. Six of the outcome measures reflected impairment and 52 reflected limitations of activity and participation. The other three outcome measures showed overlap between domains, reflecting aspects of both impairment and limitations in activity and participation. The three most frequently used measures (self-paced gait speed measured over a short distance, spatiotemporal parameters and fast gait speed) were used 350 times but only assessed one ICF subcategory. The Rivermead Mobility Index and the Adapted Patient Evaluation Conference System assessed the greatest number of ICF subcategories but were used only 19 times and once respectively. Conclusions The most frequently used outcome measures reflect only one aspect of walking ability: walking short distances. Mobility tasks related to function in the community, like walking long distances, around obstacles and over uneven ground, and moving around outside or in buildings other then the home are not well represented by outcome measures used in most studies.

[1]  C. Richards,et al.  Coactivation during gait as an adaptive behavior after stroke. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[2]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Outcome measurement in Australian rehabilitation environments. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  Gavin Williams,et al.  Measuring High-Level Mobility After Traumatic Brain Injury , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  P. Goldie,et al.  Walking speed on parquetry and carpet after stroke: effect of surface and retest reliability , 1999, Clinical Rehabilitation.

[5]  C. McDonald Physical activity, health impairments, and disability in neuromuscular disease. , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  Luigi Ferrucci,et al.  Environmental Components of Mobility Disability in Community‐Living Older Persons , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  D. Coakley,et al.  Validating the Orpington Prognostic Score in an Irish in-patient stroke population. , 2005, Irish medical journal.

[8]  R. Macko,et al.  Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  N. Ashworth,et al.  The validity of patient and physician estimates of walking distance , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  A. Rodriquez,et al.  Gait training efficacy using a home-based practice model in chronic hemiplegia. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Kim L Coleman,et al.  Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  H. Ring,et al.  The outcome of a second stroke: the impact on hemispheric functioning , 1992 .

[13]  Janice J Eng,et al.  Submaximal exercise in persons with stroke: test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with maximal oxygen consumption. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  M. Wong,et al.  Temporal stride and force analysis of cane-assisted gait in people with hemiplegic stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  John D Sorkin,et al.  Steps After Stroke: Capturing Ambulatory Recovery , 2005, Stroke.

[16]  D. Wade,et al.  Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Joel Stein,et al.  High-Intensity Resistance Training Improves Muscle Strength, Self-Reported Function, and Disability in Long-Term Stroke Survivors , 2004, Stroke.

[18]  Teresa Smith,et al.  Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  Enrique Viosca,et al.  Proposal and validation of a new functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  ICF Core Sets for stroke. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[21]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. , 1995, Stroke.

[22]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The Falls-Efficacy Scale, Swedish version: does it reflect clinically meaningful changes after stroke? , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[23]  C. Richards,et al.  Comparison of changes in upper and lower extremity impairments and disabilities after stroke , 2003, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[24]  Cv. Granger,et al.  Guide for the use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation , 1986 .

[25]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. , 2003, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[26]  Sarah Tyson,et al.  Development of the Brunel Balance Assessment: a new measure of balance disability post stroke , 2004 .

[27]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Gait performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: selected variables. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Wiebo H Brouwer,et al.  Functional recovery of gait and joint kinematics after right hemispheric stroke. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  E. Hamrin,et al.  A five-year follow-up of stroke survivors: motorfunction and activities of daily living , 1995 .

[30]  C. Hsieh,et al.  Psychometric properties of the modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile in stroke patients , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[31]  S. Lichtman,et al.  Validation of a lateropulsion scale for patients recovering from stroke , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[32]  H. Barbeau,et al.  A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. , 1998, Stroke.

[33]  D. Knol,et al.  The value of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile (RAP) as a quality sub-system in rehabilitation medicine , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[34]  W. V. van Harten,et al.  Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: first results of the ACROSS project , 2001, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[35]  G. Baer,et al.  Achievement of simple mobility milestones after stroke. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  I. McDowell,et al.  Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[37]  N. Solomon,et al.  Prevalence of stroke and stroke-related disability. Estimates from the Auckland stroke studies. , 1997, Stroke.

[38]  P. Goldie,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation: choosing a discriminative measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  F. Vanclay,et al.  Predicting discharge status at commencement of stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Stroke.

[40]  P. Goldie,et al.  The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients: intra-rater and inter-rater reliability , 1996 .

[41]  M. Dam,et al.  The Effects of Long‐term Rehabilitation Therapy on Poststroke Hemiplegic Patients , 1993, Stroke.

[42]  Agneta Ståhl,et al.  Theoretical understanding and methodological challenges in accessibility assessments, focusing the environmental component: an example from travel chains in urban public bus transport. , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[43]  M. Tinetti Performance‐Oriented Assessment of Mobility Problems in Elderly Patients , 1986, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[44]  Gerald V. Smith,et al.  Microprocessor-based ambulatory activity monitoring in stroke patients. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[45]  F. Bell,et al.  Visual assessment of hemiplegic gait following stroke: pilot study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  B. Brouwer,et al.  Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee: effects on function and spasticity. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[47]  P. Goldie,et al.  Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[48]  Nancy E Mayo,et al.  The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): a comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[49]  J. Selfe,et al.  Measurement of mobility following stroke: a comparison of the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index and the Motor Assessment Scale , 2004 .

[50]  T Ewert,et al.  Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[51]  P. Halligan,et al.  Visual gait analysis: the development of a clinical assessment and scale , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[52]  I. Miyai,et al.  A Pilot Study of the Effect of L-Threodops on Rehabilitation Outcome of Stroke Patients , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[53]  J B Bussmann,et al.  Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[54]  Residual mobility problems after stroke. , 1991, International disability studies.

[55]  R. Eldar,et al.  Tai Chi Chuan practice in community-dwelling persons after stroke , 2004, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[56]  C. Ochoa-Sangrador,et al.  Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[57]  Amanda Williams,et al.  Differential responses to measures of gait performance among healthy and neurologically impaired individuals. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[58]  T. Olsen,et al.  Prediction of walking function in stroke patients with initial lower extremity paralysis: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[59]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[60]  Lorie G Richards,et al.  Physical therapy during stroke rehabilitation for people with different walking abilities. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[61]  J. Carlsson,et al.  Self-selected walking speed in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[62]  M. Weatherall,et al.  Functional measures across neurologic disease states: analysis of factors in common. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[63]  L. Rochester,et al.  Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[64]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[65]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[66]  J. Thonnard,et al.  The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[67]  John S. Green,et al.  A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[68]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Walking after stroke: comfortable versus maximum safe speed , 1992, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[69]  June L. Wright,et al.  Physiotherapy Outcome Measures for Rehabilitation of Elderly People , 1998 .

[70]  M. Reding,et al.  Comparison of Partial Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Gait Training Versus Aggressive Bracing Assisted Walking Post Stroke , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[71]  Relation between gait speed, knee muscle torque and motor scores in post-stroke patients. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[72]  Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on four internal disorders using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. , 2004 .

[73]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  Validity of the extended activities of daily living scale , 1994 .

[74]  P. Catlin,et al.  Establishing the reliability and validity of measurements of walking time using the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[75]  G. Davis,et al.  Cardiorespiratory fitness and walking ability in subacute stroke patients. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[76]  W. Miller,et al.  Measurement properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale among individuals with stroke , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[77]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[78]  J W Jutai,et al.  Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[79]  B. Langhammer,et al.  Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[80]  Joy Adamson,et al.  Is stroke the most common cause of disability? , 2004, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[81]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Dimensions of Mobility: Defining the Complexity and Difficulty Associated with Community Mobility , 1999 .

[82]  D. Wade,et al.  Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. , 1990, International disability studies.

[83]  S L Wolf,et al.  Modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile: An Outcome Measure for the Rehabilitation of Poststroke Gait Dysfunction , 2001, Stroke.

[84]  D. Kairy,et al.  A postural adaptation test for stroke patients , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[85]  Gerald V. Smith,et al.  Effects of Aerobic Treadmill Training on Gait Velocity, Cadence, and Gait Symmetry in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke: A Preliminary Report , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[86]  G. Ekuklu,et al.  Cognitive Evaluation and Functional Outcome After Stroke , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[87]  J. Gladman,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention to increase outdoor mobility after stroke , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[88]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Mobility in Complex Environments: Implications for Clinical Assessment and Rehabilitation , 2001 .

[89]  J. Bean,et al.  High intensity strength training improves strength and functional performance after stroke. , 2000, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[90]  K. J. Miller,et al.  Recovery of standing balance and functional mobility after stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[91]  G. Holland,et al.  Functional and Locomotive Characteristics of Stroke Survivors in Japanese Community-Based Rehabilitation , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.