A Characteristic‐Hull Based Method for Home Range Estimation

Recent literature has reported inaccuracies associated with some popular home range estimators such as kernel density estimation, especially when applied to point patterns of complex shapes. This study explores the use of characteristic hull polygons (CHPs) as a new method of home range estimation. CHPs are special bounding polygons created in GIS that can have concave edges, be composed of disjoint regions, and contain areas of unoccupied space within their interiors. CHPs are created by constructing the Delaunay triangulation of a set of points and then removing a subset of the resulting triangles. Here, CHPs consisting of 95% of the smallest triangles, measured in terms of perimeter, are applied for home range estimation. First, CHPs are applied to simulated animal locational data conforming to five point pattern shapes at three sample sizes. Then, the method is applied to black-footed albatross (Phoebastria nigripes) locational data for illustration and comparison to other methods. For the simulated data, 95% CHPs produced unbiased home range estimates in terms of size for linear and disjoint point patterns and slight underestimates (8–20%) for perforated, concave, and convex ones. The estimated and known home ranges intersected one another by 72–96%, depending on shape and sample size, suggesting that the method has potential as a home range estimator. Additionally, the CHPs applied to estimate albatross home ranges illustrate how the method produces reasonable estimates for bird species that intensively forage in disjoint habitat patches.

[1]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions , 2004 .

[2]  J. Row,et al.  Kernels Are Not Accurate Estimators of Home-range Size for Herpetofauna , 2006, Copeia.

[3]  Antony Galton,et al.  What Is the Region Occupied by a Set of Points? , 2006, GIScience.

[4]  Michael S. Mitchell,et al.  Estimated home ranges can misrepresent habitat relationships on patchy landscapes , 2008 .

[5]  Frederik P. Agterberg,et al.  Interactive spatial data analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Robert A. Gitzen,et al.  Analysis of Animal Space Use and Movements , 2001 .

[7]  Jason Jones,et al.  Describing breeding territories of migratory passerines: suggestions for sampling, choice of estimator, and delineation of core areas , 2005 .

[8]  Bruce J. Worton,et al.  A CONVEX HULL-BASED ESTIMATOR OF HOME-RANGE SIZE , 1995 .

[9]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[10]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Comparison of least-squares cross-validation bandwidth options for kernel home-range estimation , 2003 .

[11]  BARRY A. SAMPSON,et al.  Tracking the Rapid Pace of GIS-Related Capabilities and Their Accessibility , 2006 .

[12]  T C Bailey,et al.  Interactive spatial data analysis in medical geography. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[13]  JOHN FIEBERG,et al.  Utilization Distribution Estimation Using Weighted Kernel Density Estimators , 2007 .

[14]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home- range analyses with least-squares cross-validation , 2005 .

[15]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Comparability of three analytical techniques to assess joint space use , 2004 .

[16]  Patricia Fernández,et al.  Foraging destinations of three low‐latitude albatross (Phoebastria) species , 2001 .

[17]  Antony Galton,et al.  Efficient generation of simple polygons for characterizing the shape of a set of points in the plane , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  C. O. Mohr,et al.  Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals , 1947 .

[19]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Analysing space use patterns by Thiessen polygon and triangulated irregular network interpolation: a non-parametric method for processing telemetric animal fixes , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[20]  D. Righton,et al.  Application of GIS to investigate the use of space in coral reef fish: a comparison of territorial behaviour in two Red Sea butterflyfishes , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Estimating probability surfaces for geographical point data: an adaptive kernel algorithm , 1995 .

[22]  B. J. Worton,et al.  A review of models of home range for animal movement , 1987 .

[23]  Atsuyuki Okabe,et al.  A kernel density estimation method for networks, its computational method and a GIS‐based tool , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[24]  SUE K. BATH,et al.  Characterization of Home Range Using Point Peeling Algorithms , 2006 .

[25]  Kathleen E. Franzreb,et al.  Implications of home-range estimation in the management of red-cockaded woodpeckers in South Carolina , 2006 .

[26]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Improving and Extending Home Range and Habitat Analysis by Integration with a Geographic Information System , 2002, Trans. GIS.

[27]  E. Debevec,et al.  LINEAR HOME RANGES: EFFECTS OF SMOOTHING, SAMPLE SIZE, AND AUTOCORRELATION ON KERNEL ESTIMATES , 2001 .

[28]  R. Courtois,et al.  Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations , 2002 .

[29]  Mark W. Horner,et al.  Network-based Home Range Analysis Using Delaunay Triangulation , 2007, 4th International Symposium on Voronoi Diagrams in Science and Engineering (ISVD 2007).

[30]  Robert A. Gitzen,et al.  Bandwidth Selection for Fixed-Kernel Analysis of Animal Utilization Distributions , 2006 .

[31]  Stephen P. Kaluzny,et al.  S+SpatialStats: User’s Manual for Windows® and UNIX® , 1998 .

[32]  C. D. Kemp,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[33]  Jon S. Horne,et al.  Likelihood Cross-Validation Versus Least Squares Cross-Validation for Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in Kernel Home-Range Analysis , 2006 .

[34]  Peter N. Laver,et al.  A Critical Review of Home Range Studies , 2008 .

[35]  Mark W. Horner,et al.  Effects of Point Pattern Shape on Home-Range Estimates , 2008 .