THE ROLE OF REGULATORY FOCUS IN MESSAGE FRAMING IN ANTISMOKING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR ADOLESCENTS

The present research addresses how framing may influence the effectiveness of advertising messages aimed at preventing smoking among adolescents. The research applies regulatory focus theory to explore the effectiveness of message framing in antismoking advertisements. The finding reveals that adolescents demonstrate (1) lower intentions to smoke, (2) lower perceived pharmacological benefits of smoking, and (3) lower perceived psychological benefits of smoking when the fit between the regulatory goal and the antismoking message frame is congruent (versus incongruent). Therefore, antismoking messages for adolescents with a promotion focus should emphasize promotion-related merits of abstaining from smoking, whereas antismoking messages for adolescents with a prevention focus should emphasize prevention-related merits of abstaining from smoking.

[1]  E. Higgins,et al.  Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[3]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  “I” Seek Pleasures and “We” Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion , 2001 .

[5]  E. Higgins,et al.  Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Characterizing and identifying "hard-core" smokers: implications for further reducing smoking prevalence. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[7]  S A Glantz,et al.  Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot , 2002 .

[9]  E. Higgins.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[10]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[11]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[12]  Peter Messeri,et al.  Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[13]  Youjae Yi.  The Effects of Contextual Priming in Print Advertisements , 1990 .

[14]  N. Liberman,et al.  Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Nongains: A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity , 2000 .

[15]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Gary F. Soldow,et al.  Response to commercials as a function of program context. , 1981 .

[18]  O. Klein,et al.  Prejudice on the stage: self-monitoring and the public expression of group attitudes. , 2004, The British journal of social psychology.

[19]  J. Sargent,et al.  Positive and negative outcome expectations of smoking: implications for prevention. , 1999, Preventive medicine.

[20]  D. D. Schoenbachler,et al.  Adolescent Processing of Social and Physical Threat Communications , 1996 .

[21]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 1990 .

[22]  B. S. Flynn,et al.  Antismoking advertising campaigns for youth. , 1998, JAMA.

[23]  Cornelia Pechmann,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Joint Effects of Advertising and Peers on Adolescents' Beliefs and Intentions about Cigarette Consumption , 2002 .

[24]  C. Jackson,et al.  Initial and experimental stages of tobacco and alcohol use during late childhood: relation to peer, parent, and personal risk factors. , 1997, Addictive behaviors.

[25]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Goals and Framing: How Outcome Focus Influences Motivation and Emotion , 1995 .

[26]  E Tory Higgins,et al.  Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors , 1993 .

[28]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  L. Biener,et al.  Adult and youth response to the Massachusetts anti-tobacco television campaign. , 2000, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[30]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Effects of Antismoking and Cigarette Advertising on Young Adolescents' Perceptions of Peers Who Smoke , 1994 .

[31]  Youjae Yi.  The indirect effects of advertisements designed to change product attribute beliefs , 1990 .

[32]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values: The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making , 2002 .

[33]  L. Peracchio,et al.  The Development of an Advertising Campaign to Discourage Smoking Initiation among Children and Youth , 1998 .

[34]  Anthony Biglan,et al.  Peer and parental influences on adolescent tobacco use , 1995, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[35]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Christian H. Jordan,et al.  Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Teresa Brannick,et al.  Fear Appeals: Segmentation is the Way to Go , 1992 .

[38]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior , 1995 .

[39]  M. Goldberg,et al.  What to Convey in Antismoking Advertisements for Adolescents: The use of Protection Motivation Theory to Identify Effective Message Themes , 2003 .