Expectancy theory and police productivity in DUI enforcement

This article drew on expectancy theory in industrial/organizational psychology to explain arrest productivity for driving under the influence (DUI) in a sample of Pennsylvania police officers. Expectancy theory is a cognitive model of motivation and performance based on workers' perceptions of their situation. Its major elements are estimated in a regression model: the officer's capability and opportunity for DUI enforcement (performance-reward expectancy), the instrumentality of DUI enforcement behavior for the officer, and the reward-cost balance associated with making DUI arrests. These factors account for 26% of the residual variance in the number of DUI arrests made annually once organizational effects have been removed. The relationships revealed are as expectancy theory predicts, except for instrumentality variables, which show a negative relationship to arrest productivity. This is due largely to the orientation of a small number of "rate busters," whose exceptionally high arrest rate and negative attitudes toward their peers and the department hierarchy make them a distinct group accounting for a disproportionate number of arrests.

[1]  P. C. Noordzij,et al.  Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety — T86 , 1988 .

[2]  Ralph Hingson,et al.  Discretionary leniency in police enforcement of laws against drinking and driving: Two examples from the state of Maine, USA , 1989 .

[3]  D. Harris Visual Detection of Driving While Intoxicated , 1980, Human factors.

[4]  J. French,et al.  Overcoming Resistance to Change , 1948 .

[5]  Susan O. White A Perspective on Police Professionalization , 1972 .

[6]  Egon Bittner,et al.  Learning the Skills of Policing , 1984 .

[7]  Evelyn R. Vingilis,et al.  Police Enforcement Practices and Perceptions of Drinking-Driving Laws , 1986 .

[8]  J. Goldstein,et al.  Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low-Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice , 1960 .

[9]  William Foote Whyte,et al.  Money and motivation; an analysis of incentives in industry. , 1956 .

[10]  R. Kanfer Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[11]  N. Feather Expectations and Actions , 2021 .

[12]  Peter K. Manning,et al.  Working the Street: Police Discretion and the Dilemmas of Reform. , 1984 .

[13]  Marcelline Burns DUI ENFORCEMENT PROBLEMS AT ROADSIDE , 1991 .

[14]  John,et al.  Working the street; a developmental view of police behavior , 1973 .

[15]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Causes of Police Behavior: the Current State of Quantitative Research , 1980 .

[16]  Mark H. Moore,et al.  Beyond 911: A New Era For Policing , 1990 .

[17]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Police Work: The Social Organization of Policing. , 1977 .

[18]  Robert B. Voas ENFORCEMENT OF DUI LAWS , 1991 .

[19]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. , 1974 .

[20]  Paul M. Hurst Traffic officers' attitudes toward blood alcohol law enforcement , 1980 .

[21]  Maurice Punch,et al.  Control in the Police Organization , 1983 .

[22]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[23]  Robert E. Worden,et al.  Situational and Attitudinal Explanations of Police Behavior: A Theoretical Reappraisal and Empirical Assessment , 1989 .

[24]  John R. Snortum,et al.  Police documentation of drunk-driving arrests: Jury verdicts and guilty pleas as a function of quantity and quality of evidence , 1990 .

[25]  Wayne R. LaFave,et al.  Arrest : the decision to take a suspect into custody , 1966 .

[26]  James B. Jacobs Drunk Driving: An American Dilemma , 1989 .

[27]  David J. Bordua,et al.  Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society , 1967 .

[28]  Evelyn R. Vingilis PROBLEMS IN DETECTING DWIS , 1991 .

[29]  Ralph Hingson,et al.  Cops and drivers: Police discretion and the enforcement of Maine's 1981 OUI law , 1987 .

[30]  James F. Wilson Varieties of Police Behavior: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities , 1968 .

[31]  E. Bittner The Functions of the Police in Modern Society: A Review of Background Factors, Current Practices, and Possible Role Models , 1979 .

[32]  A. Reiss,et al.  The police and the public , 1971 .

[33]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Policing Domestic Violence: Experiments and Dilemmas , 1992 .

[34]  H. Jacob The potential for reform of criminal justice , 1974 .

[35]  Donald Black,et al.  The Social Organization of Arrest , 1971 .

[36]  W. Westley,et al.  Violence and the Police , 1953, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety , 1988 .

[38]  Stephen D. Mastrofski,et al.  Organizational Determinants of Police Discretion - the Case of Drinking-Driving , 1987 .