The Semiotics of the Schema

What is the relationship between our mental activity and the empirical objects of the world? Kant raised this question in the Critique of Pure Reason and attempted to answer it by arguing that between the realm of concepts and that of sensuous phenomena lies the schema. Piaget re-elaborated the Kantian concept of schema and since then it has been extensively used in constructivist and psychological accounts of the mind. In this article, I discuss Kant’s and Piaget’s concept of schema from a semiotic-cultural perspective. Attention is paid to the epistemological premises on which the Kantian and Piagetian theoretical elaborations of the concept of schema were based and the role that signs played therein. I contend that the schema and its genesis can be better conceptualized if we take into account linguistic and non-linguistic mediated actions embedded in the social processes of meaning production and knowledge objectification. My discussion interweaves epistemological concerns with the semiotic analysis of a group of Grade 11 students dealing with the mathematical understanding and description of a natural phenomenon — the movement of a body along a ramp in a technological environment.

[1]  R. Pea Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education , 1993 .

[2]  Pierre Vérillon,et al.  Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity , 1995 .

[3]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Distributed cognition , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[4]  L. Radford Gestures, Speech, and the Sprouting of Signs: A Semiotic-Cultural Approach to Students' Types of Generalization , 2003 .

[5]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman , 2000 .

[6]  R. Daval La métaphysique de Kant , 1950 .

[7]  L. Brunschvicg L'expérience humaine et la causalité physique , 1922 .

[8]  Michael Otte,et al.  Does Mathematics Have Objects? in what Sense? , 2004, Synthese.

[9]  L. Radford,et al.  The Seen, the Spoken, and the Written: A Semiotic Approach to the Problem of Objectification of Mathematical Knowledge. , 2002 .

[10]  Myrdene Anderson,et al.  Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis : from thinking to interpreting to knowing , 2003 .

[11]  Ornella Robutti,et al.  From Body Motion to Algebra through Graphing , 2001 .

[12]  V. Lektorskiĭ,et al.  Subject, object, cognition , 1984 .

[13]  Michele Cerulli,et al.  Calculators, Graphs, Gestures and the Production of Meaning. , 2003 .

[14]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Théories du Langage, Théories de l'Apprentissage le Débat Entre Jean Piaget Et Noam Chomsky , 1982 .

[15]  Stephen Lerman,et al.  Intersubjectivity in Mathematics Learning: A Challenge to the Radical Constructivist Paradigm? , 2019 .

[16]  Problèmes de psychologie génétique , 1972 .

[17]  Umberto Eco,et al.  Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture , 2000 .

[18]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Psychologie et épistémologie , 1970 .

[19]  Susan Buck‐Morss Socio-Economic Bias in Piaget’s Theory and Its Implications for Cross-Culture Studies , 1975 .

[20]  Theodor W. Adorno,et al.  Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason' , 2001 .

[21]  A. N. Leontʹev,et al.  Activité, conscience, personnalité , 1984 .

[22]  Michael Otte Limits of Constructivism: Kant, Piaget and Peirce , 1998 .

[23]  Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibniz,et al.  New Essays Concerning Human Understanding , 2003 .

[24]  R. Livingstone,et al.  Kant's Critique of pure reason (1959) , 2001 .

[25]  M. Heidegger Poetry, Language, Thought , 1971 .

[26]  Evert W. Beth,et al.  Mathematical Epistemology And Psychology , 1966 .