Endochondral growth in growth plates of three species at two anatomical locations modulated by mechanical compression and tension

Sustained mechanical loading alters longitudinal growth of bones, and this growth sensitivity to load has been implicated in progression of skeletal deformities during growth. The objective of this study was to quantify the relationship between altered growth and different magnitudes of sustained altered stress in a diverse set of nonhuman growth plates. The sensitivity of endochondral growth to differing magnitudes of sustained compression or distraction stress was measured in growth plates of three species of immature animals (rats, rabbits, calves) at two anatomical locations (caudal vertebra and proximal tibia) with two different ages of rats and rabbits. An external loading apparatus was applied for 8 days, and growth was measured as the distance between fluorescent markers administered 24 and 48 h prior to euthanasia. An apparently linear relationship between stress and percentage growth modulation (percent difference between loaded and control growth plates) was found, with distraction accelerating growth and compression slowing growth. The growth‐rate sensitivity to stress was between 9.2 and 23.9% per 0.1 MPa for different growth plates and averaged 17.1% per 0.1 MPa. The growth‐rate sensitivity to stress differed between vertebrae and the proximal tibia (15 and 18.6% per 0.1 MPa, respectively). The range of control growth rates of different growth plates was large (30 microns/day for rat vertebrae to 366 microns/day for rabbit proximal tibia). The relatively small differences in growth‐rate sensitivity to stress for a diverse set of growth plates suggest that these results might be generalized to other growth plates, including human. These data may be applicable to planning the management of progressive deformities in patients having residual growth. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 24:1327–1334, 2006

[1]  I. Stokes,et al.  Mechanical Modulation of Vertebral Body Growth: Implications for Scoliosis Progression , 1996, Spine.

[2]  Mack Gardner-Morse,et al.  Muscle Activation Strategies and Symmetry of Spinal Loading in the Lumbar Spine With Scoliosis , 2004, Spine.

[3]  Jeff Houck,et al.  Rabbit knee joint biomechanics: Motion analysis and modeling of forces during hopping , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  A. Diméglio,et al.  Growth in pediatric orthopaedics. , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[5]  T N Khomiak,et al.  [On scoliosis]. , 1965, Ortopediia travmatologiia i protezirovanie.

[6]  R. Porter The effect of tension across a growing epiphysis. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  Michael M Morlock,et al.  Adaptation of mechanical, morphological, and biochemical properties of the rat growth plate to dose-dependent voluntary exercise. , 2004, Bone.

[8]  J. Kenwright,et al.  Physeal distraction and cell proliferation in the growth plate. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  H. Heikel On ossification and growth of certain bones of the rabbit; with a comparison of the skeletal age in the rabbit and in man. , 1960, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  R ROAF,et al.  Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  P. Colonna,et al.  The effect of compression on the growth of epiphyseal bone. , 1956, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[12]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Physiological mechanisms adopted by chondrocytes in regulating longitudinal bone growth in rats. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Tensile properties of the physis vary with anatomic location, thickness, strain rate and age , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  C. Barrios,et al.  Longitudinal growth pattern of the radius after forearm fractures conservatively treated in children. , 1994, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[15]  A. Crawford,et al.  Growth Plate Forces in the Adolescent Human Knee: A Radiographic and Mechanical Study of Epiphyseal Staples , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[16]  I. Stokes,et al.  Mechanical modulation of calf tail vertebral growth: implications for scoliosis progression. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[17]  A. Nachemson Disc Pressure Measurements , 1981, Spine.

[18]  Ellen M. Leiferman,et al.  Differential growth by growth plates as a function of multiple parameters of chondrocytic kinetics , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  Luke Windisch,et al.  Vertebral Height Growth Predominates Over Intervertebral Disc Height Growth in Adolescents With Scoliosis , 2006, Spine.

[20]  E. Morscher,et al.  The relationship between periosteal division and compression or distraction of the growth plate. An experimental study in the rabbit. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  Stuart L. Weinstein,et al.  Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopedics , 1996 .

[22]  F. Shapiro,et al.  A longitudinal study of the growth of the New Zealand white rabbit: Cumulative and biweekly incremental growth rates for body length, body weight, femoral length, and tibial length , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  M. Safran,et al.  Continued growth of the proximal part of the tibia after prosthetic reconstruction of the skeletally immature knee. Estimation of the minimum growth force in vivo in humans. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  I. Stokes,et al.  Modulation of vertebral and tibial growth by compression loading: Diurnal versus full‐time loading , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  D. Hueter Anatomische Studien an den Extremitätengelenken Neugeborener und Erwachsener , 2005, Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin.

[26]  H. Skinner,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of the Etiology of Tibia Vara , 1983, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[27]  N Ohashi,et al.  Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force. , 2001, Bone.

[28]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli: Function as a determinant for adaptive remodeling in bone , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[29]  F. Bonnel,et al.  Effects of compression on growth plates in the rabbit. , 1983, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[30]  D. Burr,et al.  The Effects of Dynamic Axial Loading on the Rat Growth Plate , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  S. Sijbrandij INHIBITION OF TIBIAL GROWTH BY MEANS OF COMPRESSION OF ITS PROXIMAL EPIPHYSIAL DISC IN THE RABBIT. , 1963, Acta anatomica.

[32]  E. Hunziker,et al.  Improved cartilage fixation by ruthenium hexammine trichloride (RHT). A prerequisite for morphometry in growth cartilage. , 1982, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[33]  M. Markel,et al.  Growing Pains: Are They Due to Increased Growth During Recumbency as Documented in a Lamb Model? , 2004, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.