Global synthesis of the temperature sensitivity of leaf litter breakdown in streams and rivers

Streams and rivers are important conduits of terrestrially derived carbon (C) to atmospheric and marine reservoirs. Leaf litter breakdown rates are expected to increase as water temperatures rise in response to climate change. The magnitude of increase in breakdown rates is uncertain, given differences in litter quality and microbial and detritivore community responses to temperature, factors that can influence the apparent temperature sensitivity of breakdown and the relative proportion of C lost to the atmosphere vs. stored or transported downstream. Here, we synthesized 1025 records of litter breakdown in streams and rivers to quantify its temperature sensitivity, as measured by the activation energy (Ea, in eV). Temperature sensitivity of litter breakdown varied among twelve plant genera for which Ea could be calculated. Higher values of Ea were correlated with lower‐quality litter, but these correlations were influenced by a single, N‐fixing genus (Alnus). Ea values converged when genera were classified into three breakdown rate categories, potentially due to continual water availability in streams and rivers modulating the influence of leaf chemistry on breakdown. Across all data representing 85 plant genera, the Ea was 0.34 ± 0.04 eV, or approximately half the value (0.65 eV) predicted by metabolic theory. Our results indicate that average breakdown rates may increase by 5–21% with a 1–4 °C rise in water temperature, rather than a 10–45% increase expected, according to metabolic theory. Differential warming of tropical and temperate biomes could result in a similar proportional increase in breakdown rates, despite variation in Ea values for these regions (0.75 ± 0.13 eV and 0.27 ± 0.05 eV, respectively). The relative proportions of gaseous C loss and organic matter transport downstream should not change with rising temperature given that Ea values for breakdown mediated by microbes alone and microbes plus detritivores were similar at the global scale.

[1]  J. R. Manson,et al.  Impact of warming on CO2 emissions from streams countered by aquatic photosynthesis , 2016 .

[2]  S. Hättenschwiler,et al.  The importance of litter traits and decomposers for litter decomposition: A comparison of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems within and across biomes , 2016 .

[3]  Cang Hui,et al.  Biotic and abiotic variables influencing plant litter breakdown in streams: a global study , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  N. Griffiths,et al.  Organic-matter decomposition along a temperature gradient in a forested headwater stream , 2016, Freshwater Science.

[5]  A. Huryn,et al.  Interactions between temperature and nutrients across levels of ecological organization , 2015, Global change biology.

[6]  A. Huryn,et al.  Does N2 fixation amplify the temperature dependence of ecosystem metabolism? , 2015, Ecology.

[7]  M. Bradford,et al.  Climate history shapes contemporary leaf litter decomposition , 2015, Biogeochemistry.

[8]  D. Schindler,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of community respiration rates in streams is associated with watershed geomorphic features , 2014 .

[9]  R. Aerts,et al.  Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes , 2014, Nature.

[10]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[11]  P. Ciais,et al.  Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters , 2013, Nature.

[12]  M. Bradford.  Thermal adaptation of decomposer communities in warming soils , 2013, Front. Microbiol..

[13]  A. Larrañaga,et al.  Leaf-litter quality effects on stream ecosystem functioning: a comparison among five species , 2013 .

[14]  Diana H. Wall,et al.  Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[15]  P. Yager,et al.  Degradation of terrestrially derived macromolecules in the Amazon River , 2013 .

[16]  R. Wagai,et al.  Linking temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition to its molecular structure, accessibility, and microbial physiology , 2013, Global change biology.

[17]  Paul D. Cotter,et al.  Nucleic acid-based approaches to investigate microbial-related cheese quality defects , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[18]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Ecoenzymatic Stoichiometry and Ecological Theory , 2012 .

[19]  R. Aerts,et al.  Highly consistent effects of plant litter identity and functional traits on decomposition across a latitudinal gradient. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[20]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Reconciling the temperature dependence of respiration across timescales and ecosystem types , 2012, Nature.

[21]  Brendan G. McKie,et al.  Continental-Scale Effects of Nutrient Pollution on Stream Ecosystem Functioning , 2012, Science.

[22]  W. Post,et al.  Parameter estimation for models of ligninolytic and cellulolytic enzyme kinetics , 2012 .

[23]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward , 2011 .

[24]  M. Graça,et al.  Global distribution of a key trophic guild contrasts with common latitudinal diversity patterns. , 2011, Ecology.

[25]  D. Schlosser,et al.  Fungi in freshwaters: ecology, physiology and biochemical potential. , 2011, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[26]  J. R. Manson,et al.  Temperature and the metabolic balance of streams , 2011 .

[27]  Verónica Ferreira,et al.  Future increase in temperature more than decrease in litter quality can affect microbial litter decomposition in streams , 2011, Oecologia.

[28]  David Dudgeon,et al.  A global experiment suggests climate warming will not accelerate litter decomposition in streams but might reduce carbon sequestration. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[29]  Verónica Ferreira,et al.  Synergistic effects of water temperature and dissolved nutrients on litter decomposition and associated fungi , 2011 .

[30]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Rising stream and river temperatures in the United States , 2010 .

[31]  Ana F. Militino,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2010 .

[32]  G. Woodward,et al.  Warming alters the metabolic balance of ecosystems , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  W. Landman.  Climate change 2007: the physical science basis , 2010 .

[34]  M. Gessner,et al.  Diversity meets decomposition. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  N. Griffiths,et al.  A review of allochthonous organic matter dynamics and metabolism in streams , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[36]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter , 2010 .

[37]  B. Hill,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment , 2010, Nature.

[38]  S. Allison,et al.  Controls on the Temperature Sensitivity of Soil Enzymes: A Key Driver of In Situ Enzyme Activity Rates , 2010 .

[39]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  Temperature, predator–prey interaction strength and population stability , 2009 .

[40]  S. Larsen,et al.  Relationships between structure and function in streams contrasting in temperature , 2009 .

[41]  Andreas Richter,et al.  The boundless carbon cycle , 2009 .

[42]  M. Gessner,et al.  Functional leaf traits and biodiversity effects on litter decomposition in a stream. , 2009, Ecology.

[43]  M. Ardón,et al.  Does leaf chemistry differentially affect breakdown in tropical vs temperate streams? Importance of standardized analytical techniques to measure leaf chemistry , 2009, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[44]  M. Gessner,et al.  Temperature oscillation coupled with fungal community shifts can modulate warming effects on litter decomposition. , 2009, Ecology.

[45]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Modelling for Nested Data , 2009 .

[46]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[47]  Christoph D. Matthaei,et al.  Organic matter breakdown and ecosystem metabolism: functional indicators for assessing river ecosystem health , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[48]  J. Cole,et al.  Expanding the concept of trophic state in aquatic ecosystems: It’s not just the autotrophs , 2007, Aquatic Sciences.

[49]  F. Guérold,et al.  Leaf litter breakdown budgets in streams of various trophic status: effects of dissolved inorganic nutrients on microorganisms and invertebrates , 2007 .

[50]  A. Lopez-Urrutia,et al.  Resource limitation of bacterial production distorts the temperature dependence of oceanic carbon cycling. , 2007, Ecology.

[51]  W. Parton,et al.  Sensitivity of organic matter decomposition to warming varies with its quality , 2007 .

[52]  Christian P. Kubicek,et al.  Fungal decomposers of plant litter in aquatic ecosystems (chapter 17) , 2007 .

[53]  Jeanne Marvig,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF STREAM MICROFUNGI IN CONTROLLING BREAKDOWN RATES OF LEAF LITTER' , 2007 .

[54]  James H. Brown,et al.  Linking the global carbon cycle to individual metabolism , 2005 .

[55]  N. Fierer,et al.  LITTER QUALITY AND THE TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY OF DECOMPOSITION , 2005 .

[56]  A. Covich,et al.  Relative Importance of Bacteria and Fungi in a Tropical Headwater Stream: Leaf Decomposition and Invertebrate Feeding Preference , 2005, Microbial Ecology.

[57]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[58]  G. Ågren,et al.  Soil organic matter quality interpreted thermodynamically , 1999 .

[59]  M. Dobson,et al.  A perspective on leaf litter breakdown in streams , 1999 .

[60]  J. Meyer,et al.  Multiple Trophic Levels of a Forest Stream Linked to Terrestrial Litter Inputs , 1997 .

[61]  S. Hobbie.  Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra , 1996 .

[62]  Keller Suberkropp,et al.  Interactions with invertebrates , 1992 .

[63]  P. Boon,et al.  A review of methodology used to measure leaf litter decomposition in lotic environments: Time to turn over an old leaf? , 1991 .

[64]  Jackson R. Webster,et al.  VASCULAR PLANT BREAKDOWN IN FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS , 1986 .

[65]  A. Chamier,et al.  Pectinases in Leaf Degradation by Aquatic Hyphomycetes: the Enzymes and Leaf Maceration , 1982 .

[66]  J. Stanford,et al.  Thermal Responses in the Evolutionary Ecology of Aquatic Insects , 1982 .

[67]  M. Klug,et al.  The maceration of deciduous leaf litter by aquatic hyphomycetes , 1980 .

[68]  Robert C. Petersen,et al.  Leaf processing in a woodland stream , 1974 .

[69]  W. W. T.,et al.  Quantitative Laws in Biological Chemistry , 1916, Nature.