The numerics of physical parametrization

The numerical aspects of the physical parametrization are discussed mainly in the context of the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System. Two time integration techniques are discussed. With parallel splitting the tendencies of all the parametrized processes are computed independently of each other. With sequential splitting, tendencies of the explicit processes are computed first and are used as input to the subsequent implicit fast process. It is argued that sequential splitting is better than parallel splitting for problems with multiple time scales, because a balance between processes is obtained during the time integration. It is shown that sequential splitting applied to boundary layer diffusion in the ECMWF model leads to much smaller time truncation errors than does parallel splitting. The attempt in the ECMWF model to obtain 2nd order accuracy with the so called Semi-Lagrangian Averaging of Physical Parametrizations (SLAVEPP) is explained. The scheme reduces time truncation errors, although a few implementation questions remain. In the scheme fast and slow processes are handled differently and it remains a research topic to find the optimal way of handling convection and clouds. Process specific numerical issues are discussed using the ECMWF parametrization package as an example. Examples are the non-linear stability problems in the vertical diffusion scheme, the stability related mass flux limit in the convection scheme and the fast processes in the cloud microphysics. Vertical resolution in the land surface scheme is inspired by the requirement to represent diurnal to annual time scales. Finally, a new coupling strategy between atmospheric models and land surface schemes is discussed. It allows for fully implicit coupling also for tiled land surface schemes.

[1]  Christopher S. Bretherton,et al.  A Moist PBL Parameterization for Large-Scale Models and Its Application to Subtropical Cloud-Topped Marine Boundary Layers , 2001 .

[2]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Single-Column Model Intercomparison for a Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[3]  B. Sportisse An Analysis of Operator Splitting Techniques in the Stiff Case , 2000 .

[4]  M. J. P. Cullen,et al.  On the use of a predictor–corrector scheme to couple the dynamics with the physical parametrizations in the ECMWF model , 2003 .

[5]  Akio Arakawa,et al.  The parameterization of the planetary boundary layer in the UCLA general circulation model - Formulation and results , 1983 .

[6]  M. Tiedtke,et al.  Representation of Clouds in Large-Scale Models , 1993 .

[7]  J. Shadid,et al.  Studies of the Accuracy of Time Integration Methods for Reaction-Diffusion Equations ∗ , 2005 .

[8]  René Laprise,et al.  Consequences of Using the Splitting Method for Implementing Physical Forcings in a Semi-Implicit Semi-Lagrangian Model , 1998 .

[9]  François Lott,et al.  A new subgrid‐scale orographic drag parametrization: Its formulation and testing , 1997 .

[10]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  A Time-Splitting Scheme for the Elastic Equations Incorporating Second-Order Runge–Kutta Time Differencing , 1998 .

[11]  A. Lock The Numerical Representation of Entrainment in Parameterizations of Boundary Layer Turbulent Mixing , 2001 .

[12]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Evaluation of the Kinetic Energy Approach for Modeling Turbulent Fluxes in Stratocumulus , 2000 .

[13]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Time-Split versus Process-Split Coupling of Parameterizations and Dynamical Core , 2002 .

[14]  M. Tiedtke A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models , 1989 .

[15]  Nigel Wood,et al.  Analysis of Parallel versus Sequential Splittings for Time-Stepping Physical Parameterizations , 2004 .

[16]  Jan Polcher,et al.  A Proposed Structure for Coupling Tiled Surfaces with the Planetary Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[17]  L. Margolin,et al.  On balanced approximations for time integration of multiple time scale systems , 2003 .

[18]  G. L. Browning,et al.  Splitting Methods for Problems with Different Timescales , 1994 .