mTHPC-Loaded Extracellular Vesicles Significantly Improve mTHPC Diffusion and Photodynamic Activity in Preclinical Models

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), derived from the cell, display a phospholipid bilayer membrane that protects the cargo molecules from degradation and contributes to increasing their stability in the bloodstream and tumor targeting. EVs are interesting in regard to the delivery of photosensitizers (PSs) used in the photodynamic therapy (PDT), as they allow us to overcome the limitations observed with liposomes. In fact, liposomal formulation of meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) (Foslip®), one of the most potent clinically approved PSs, is rapidly destroyed in circulation, thus decreasing in vivo PDT efficacy. mTHPC-EV uptake was evaluated in vitro in a 3D human colon HT-29 microtumor and in vivo study was performed in HT-29 xenografted mice. The obtained data were compared with Foslip®. After intravenous injection of the mTHPC formulations, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and PDT-induced tumor regrowth were evaluated. In a 3D model of cells, mTHPC-EV uptake featured a deeper penetration after 24h incubation compared to liposomal mTHPC. In vivo results showed a considerable improvement of 33% tumor cure with PDT treatment applied 24h after injection, while 0% was observed after Foslip®/PDT. Moreover, 47 days were required to obtain ten times the initial tumor volume after mTHPC-EVs/PDT compared to 30 days for liposomal mTHPC. In conclusion, compared to Foslip®, mTHPC-EVs improved mTHPC biodistribution and PDT efficacy in vivo. We deduced that a major determinant factor for the improved in vivo PDT efficacy is the deep mTHPC intratumor penetration.

[1]  L. Bezdetnaya,et al.  Current state of the nanoscale delivery systems for temoporfin-based photodynamic therapy: Advanced delivery strategies. , 2019, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[2]  David Tareste,et al.  Modification of Extracellular Vesicles by Fusion with Liposomes for the Design of Personalized Biogenic Drug Delivery Systems. , 2018, ACS nano.

[3]  Ilya Yakavets,et al.  mTHPC-loaded extracellular vesicles outperform liposomal and free mTHPC formulations by an increased stability, drug delivery efficiency and cytotoxic effect in tridimensional model of tumors , 2018, Drug delivery.

[4]  L. Bezdetnaya,et al.  Drug delivery to solid tumors: the predictive value of the multicellular tumor spheroid model for nanomedicine screening , 2017, International journal of nanomedicine.

[5]  B. Fuchs,et al.  Foscan and foslip based photodynamic therapy in osteosarcoma in vitro and in intratibial mouse models , 2017, International journal of cancer.

[6]  L. Bezdetnaya,et al.  Soret band shape indicates mTHPC distribution between β-cyclodextrins and serum proteins , 2017 .

[7]  Andreas Möller,et al.  The Biodistribution and Immune Suppressive Effects of Breast Cancer-Derived Exosomes. , 2016, Cancer research.

[8]  Xin Wang,et al.  Phenylboronic Acid-Mediated Tumor Targeting of Chitosan Nanoparticles , 2016, Theranostics.

[9]  Melani A Solomon,et al.  Development of an in vitro tumor spheroid culture model amenable to high-throughput testing of potential anticancer nanotherapeutics , 2016, Journal of liposome research.

[10]  Mukesh Verma,et al.  Extracellular vesicles: potential applications in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and epidemiology , 2015, BMC Clinical Pathology.

[11]  Yuki Takahashi,et al.  Macrophage-dependent clearance of systemically administered B16BL6-derived exosomes from the blood circulation in mice , 2015, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[12]  Imre Mäger,et al.  Extracellular vesicle in vivo biodistribution is determined by cell source, route of administration and targeting , 2015, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[13]  Pieter Vader,et al.  Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: lessons from the liposome field. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[14]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Photodynamic therapy with conventional and PEGylated liposomal formulations of mTHPC (temoporfin): comparison of treatment efficacy and distribution characteristics in vivo , 2013, International journal of nanomedicine.

[15]  Yuki Takahashi,et al.  Visualization and in vivo tracking of the exosomes of murine melanoma B16-BL6 cells in mice after intravenous injection. , 2013, Journal of biotechnology.

[16]  M. Bureau,et al.  Magnetic and photoresponsive theranosomes: translating cell-released vesicles into smart nanovectors for cancer therapy. , 2013, ACS nano.

[17]  Graça Raposo,et al.  Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Interaction of Liposomal Formulations of Meta‐tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (Temoporfin) with Serum Proteins: Protein Binding and Liposome Destruction , 2012, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[19]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Redistribution of meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (m-THPC) from conventional and PEGylated liposomes to biological substrates , 2011, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[20]  David Kessel,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[21]  A. Radu,et al.  Assessment of a sheep animal model to optimise photodynamic therapy in the oesophagus , 2009, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[22]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Assessment of Apoptosis by Immunohistochemistry to Active Caspase-3, Active Caspase-7, or Cleaved PARP in Monolayer Cells and Spheroid and Subcutaneous Xenografts of Human Carcinoma , 2009, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[23]  Aled Clayton,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of Exosomes from Cell Culture Supernatants and Biological Fluids , 2006, Current protocols in cell biology.

[24]  A. Ballangrud,et al.  Binding and interstitial penetration of liposomes within avascular tumor spheroids , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[25]  P. D. de Witte,et al.  Liposomes for photodynamic therapy. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[26]  M S Croughan,et al.  Hydrodynamic effects on animal cells grown in microcarrier cultures , 1987, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  M. Neubauer,et al.  The Biology and Regenerative Potential of Stem Cells and Their Mesenchymal Progeny , 2012 .