On Certain Properties of Pied-Piping

In this article, I argue that an approach to pied-piping in terms of wh-feature percolation is problematic under minimalist assumptions. I propose an alternative theory based on Agree, arguing that wh-movement and restrictions on pied-piping follow from the interaction of the theory of phases and a violable constraint that forces wh-feature checking under Agree to be as local as possible. I present and derive three observations about pied-piping that are attested in different languages.

[1]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[2]  Anthony Giddens.  On The Edge , 2001 .

[3]  Fabian Beijer,et al.  Michal Starke's Move Dissolves into Merge: A Theory of Locality , 2001 .

[4]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[5]  Nicolas Ruwet,et al.  Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français , 1975 .

[6]  Maria Gouskova.  Split Scrambling : Barriers as Violable Constraints * , 2001 .

[7]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program , 2002 .

[8]  Gereon Müller,et al.  Phrase Impenetrability and Wh-Intervention , 2003 .

[9]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  Types of Ā-dependencies , 1990 .

[10]  Hans den Besten,et al.  The Ergative Hypothesis and Free Word Order in Dutch and German , 1985 .

[11]  Richard S. Kayne.  Connectedness and binary branching , 1984 .

[12]  M. Ronat,et al.  La Grammaire modulaire , 1986 .

[13]  Kleanthes K. Grohmann,et al.  Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of movement dependencies , 2003 .

[14]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Parameters and functional heads : essays in comparative syntax , 1996 .

[15]  H. Haider,et al.  Die Struktur der deutschen Nominalphrase , 1988 .

[16]  K Abels,et al.  Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding , 2003 .

[17]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Formal Principles of Language Acquisition , 1980 .

[18]  Jessica Coon,et al.  Interrogative Possessors and the Problem with Pied-Piping in Chol , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[19]  Natascha Müller.  In)vulnerable domains in multilingualism , 2003 .

[20]  Elizabeth Cowper,et al.  Pied Piping, Feature Percolation and the Structure of the Noun Phrase , 1987, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[21]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Pied-piping, abstract agreement, and functional projections in Tzotzil , 1996 .

[22]  Richard S. Kayne,et al.  French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle , 1975 .

[23]  J. Fleischer,et al.  Die Syntax von Pronominaladverbien in den Dialekten des Deutschen : eine Untersuchung zu Preposition Stranding und verwandten Phänomenen , 2002 .

[24]  Current Studies in Romance Linguistics , 1980 .

[25]  Rochelle Lieber,et al.  On the organization of the lexicon , 1981 .

[26]  Peter Coopmans,et al.  Lexical specification and insertion , 2000 .

[27]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  A Festschrift for Morris Halle , 1973 .

[28]  Cheng-Teh James Huang,et al.  Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar , 1998 .

[29]  Karine Megerdoomian,et al.  WCCFL 20: Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 2001 .

[30]  Seth Cable,et al.  Against the Existence of Pied-Piping: Evidence from Tlingit , 2010, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[32]  WCCFL 19 : proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 2000 .

[33]  M. Boivin.  Case Theory, Dp Movement, and Interpretation: A New Approach to the Distribution of French Subnominal Clitic en , 2005 .

[34]  Peter Gallmann,et al.  Die Steuerung der Flexion in der DP , 1996 .

[35]  Nigel Fabb,et al.  The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses , 1990, Journal of Linguistics.

[36]  Jürgen Pafel,et al.  On extraction and extraposition in German , 1996 .

[37]  Denis Bouchard,et al.  On the content of empty categories , 1982 .

[38]  Jon Ortiz de Urbina,et al.  Feature Percolation and Clausal Pied-Piping , 1993 .

[39]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Wh-Scope Marking , 2000 .

[40]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[41]  Željko Bošković,et al.  Be careful where you float your quantifiers , 2004 .

[42]  Marga Reis.  Extractions from verb-second clauses in German? , 1995 .

[43]  N. Hornstein.  Move! : a minimalist theory of construal , 2000 .

[44]  S. Cable,et al.  The grammar of Q : Q-particles and the nature of Wh-fronting, as revealed by the Wh-questions of Tlingit , 2007 .

[45]  Robert D. Borsley.  More on the difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses' , 1992 .

[46]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[47]  James McCloskey,et al.  Resumption, Successive Cyclicity, and the Locality of Operations , 2008 .

[48]  Christine Tellier.  Subjacency and subject condition violations in French , 1990 .

[49]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure: Subjects, Agreement, Case and Clitics , 1998 .

[50]  Peter Sells,et al.  Formal and empirical issues in optimality theoretic syntax , 2001 .

[51]  G. Cinque.  Italian Syntax and Universal Grammar: On the theory of relative clauses and markedness , 1982 .

[52]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Towards a Minimalist Theory of Wh-Expletives, Wh-Copying, and Successive Cyclicity , 2000 .

[53]  Gereon Müller,et al.  Derivational optimization of wh-movement , 2003 .

[54]  Susanne Trissler.  Syntaktische Bedingungen für w-Merkmale: Zur Bildung interrogativer w-Phrasen im Deutschen , 2000 .

[55]  Mark Baltin,et al.  A-bar syntax : a study in movement types , 1995 .

[56]  Ray Cattell,et al.  Constraints on Movement Rules , 1976 .

[57]  K. Hale,et al.  Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .

[58]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader , 2003 .

[59]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Step by step : essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik , 2000 .

[60]  G. Kleiber,et al.  Danièle Godard, La syntaxe des relatives en français, Éditions du CNRS, Paris, 1988 , 1990 .

[61]  Alessandra Giorgi,et al.  The syntax of noun phrases , 1991 .

[62]  K. Safir.  Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels , 1986 .

[63]  Peter Kinyua Muriungi.  Wh-Questions in Kitharaka , 2005 .

[64]  Daiko Takahashi.  Move-F and null operator movement , 1997 .

[65]  A. Kemenade.  Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages By Sten Vikner (review) , 1995 .

[66]  Thomas Roeper,et al.  Multiple grammars, feature-attraction, pied-piping, and the question: Is AGR inside TP? , 2003 .

[67]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  Mechanisms of chain formation , 2001 .

[68]  Henk C. van Riemsdijk,et al.  A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases , 1978 .

[69]  Jean-Roger Vergnaud.  French relative clauses. , 1974 .

[70]  D. Godard.  La syntaxe des relatives en français , 1988 .

[71]  Daniel Valois,et al.  On the Status of (Verbal) Traces in French: The case of stylistic inversion , 1992 .

[72]  Seth Cable.  The Grammar of Q , 2010 .

[73]  P. Guiraud.  Le système du relatif en français populaire , 1966 .

[74]  Shlomo Vinker,et al.  Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages , 1995 .

[75]  Jindrich Toman,et al.  On Pied-Piped Infinitives in German Relative Clauses , 1985 .

[76]  R. May.  Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation , 1985 .

[77]  Marga Reis.  On the paranthetical features of German Was...W-constructions and how to account for them , 2000 .

[78]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[79]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Distributed Deletion * , 2022 .

[80]  Jane Grimshaw,et al.  Locality and Extended Projection , 2000 .

[81]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[82]  Mark de Vries,et al.  Possessive Relatives and (Heavy) Pied-Piping , 2006 .

[83]  渡邊 明.  Wh-in-situ, subjacency, and chain formation , 1992 .

[84]  E. Williams,et al.  On the definition of word , 1987 .

[85]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien , 1991 .

[86]  L. Moritz.  Pied-piping and specifier-head agreement , 1994 .

[87]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[88]  T. Reinhart.  Anaphora and semantic interpretation , 1983 .

[89]  G. Cinque.  ON THE THEORY OF RELATIVE CLAUSES AND MARKEDNESS , 1982 .

[90]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation , 1992 .

[91]  Arthur Stepanov,et al.  Minimality effects in syntax , 2004 .

[92]  Christine Tellier,et al.  Licensing theory and French parasitic gaps , 1991 .

[93]  Elisabet Engdahl,et al.  Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages , 1982 .

[94]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  On the definition of word , 2004, Machine Translation.

[95]  Sandra Chung,et al.  Functional heads and proper government in Chamorro , 1991 .

[96]  Artemis Alexiadou.  Theoretical approaches to universals , 2002 .

[97]  Jindrich Toman,et al.  Studies in German Grammar , 1985 .

[98]  H. V. Riemsdijk.  Movement and Regeneration , 1989 .

[99]  Alexander Grosu,et al.  Three Studies in Locality and Case , 1994 .

[100]  Chris Collins.  Economy of derivation and the generalized proper binding condition , 1994 .

[101]  Anca Muscholl,et al.  Trace Theory , 2011, Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing.