Head up only — A design concept to enable multiple remote tower operations

Multiple remote tower operations are one concept for more cost efficient air traffic control at smaller airports. One air traffic controller (ATCO) should control traffic at two or more airports at the same time. Multiple remote tower operations for two small airports has already been successfully been validated by LFV, the Swedish air navigation service provider. As monitoring and visual observation is an important task of tower controllers, this concept raises questions on how to best support human performance when it should be applied in high traffic environments. A high fidelity study with 16 ATCOs investigated into the influence of multiple remote operations on visual attention and monitoring performance. The study was set up with high traffic volumes putting a maximum workload on the ATCO for a whole simulation run. Empirical results of eye movement measures are presented. Whilst in general visual attention distribution was not affected, less relevant events were monitored, because the visual attention was distributed over the two airports. In order to mitigate these effects, two workplace design approaches are presented - information integration and attention guidance. Advantages and challenges of the two approaches are discussed, with a focus on the impact of the design concepts on the working methods of air traffic controllers.

[1]  Meike Jipp,et al.  Monitoring behaviour of tower controllers , 2011 .

[2]  Barbara Deml,et al.  Air traffic controller assistance systems for attention direction: Comparing visual, auditory, and tactile feedback , 2011 .

[3]  Peer Manske Ice-Crean: A Visual Indication Tool in Air Traffic Control Tower Operations , 2015 .

[4]  Maik Friedrich,et al.  The options for analysing eye tracking data - The specifications for the EyeTrackingAnalyser , 2011 .

[5]  Anne Papenfuss,et al.  Assessing operational validity of remote tower control in high-fidelity tower simulation , 2010, IFAC HMS.

[6]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[7]  Hejar Gurluk Concept of an adaptive augmented vision based assistance system for air traffic control towers , 2016, 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[8]  C. Mohlenbrink,et al.  Remote airport traffic control center with augmented vision video panorama , 2009, 2009 IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[9]  Christoph Möhlenbrink,et al.  A guideline for integrating dynamic areas of interests in existing set-up for capturing eye movement: Looking at moving aircraft , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[10]  Norbert Fürstenau,et al.  Augmented Vision Videopanorama System for Remote Airport Tower Operation , 2008 .

[11]  Norbert Fürstenau,et al.  Remote Tower Experimental System with Augmented Vision Videopanorama , 2016 .

[12]  Anne Papenfuss,et al.  ATC-Monitoring When One Controller Operates Two Airports , 2011 .

[13]  Richard H. Mogford,et al.  Mental Models and Situation Awareness in Air Traffic Control , 1997 .

[14]  Niklas Peinecke,et al.  Attentional issues with helmet-mounted displays in poor visibility helicopter flight , 2014 .

[15]  Anne Papenfuss,et al.  Eye-data metrics to characterize tower controllers' visual attention in a Multipe Remote Tower Exercise , 2014 .