Mapping Landslide Risk of the World

Landslides are global hazards that cause huge economic and human losses around the world every year. The study of landslide at global scale is critical to disaster reduction and hazard risk management of world landslide disasters. Previous work on landslide mapping at the global scale was accomplished by prerequisite geographic data such as real-time precipitation, population distribution, and human casualty dataset. By combining the traditional methods to map global landslide susceptibility, this work has quantified the number of landslide events based on landslide threshold for the after-real-time 3-h resolution TRMM precipitation data from 1998 to 2012. To compensate the limited sample years with the available annual landslide records, information diffusion theory is applied to estimate the annual numbers of expected landslide events. Expressed as the annual expected number of landslide events, the resulted global landslide hazard map is validated by the global landslide hazard hotspot map developed by the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI). Population vulnerability and fatality risk of landslide hazards are calculated at the global scale by combining LandScan global population data and the global landslide fatality inventory. Different from global landslide hazard maps, populous regions near plate margins and corridors or the transition zones from plain to the mountain areas have higher landslide fatality risk. Himalaya Rim, Central and South America, Italy, and Iran are identified as high landslide fatality risk regions. Developing countries with large portions of mountain territory bear the highest fatality risks around the globe.

[1]  庞宇,et al.  TRMM-Data-Based Spatial and Seasonal Patterns of Precipitation in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau , 2016 .

[2]  W. Z. Savage,et al.  Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning , 2008 .

[3]  S. L. Kuriakose,et al.  Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: An overview , 2008 .

[4]  Yang Hong,et al.  Use of satellite remote sensing data in the mapping of global landslide susceptibility , 2007 .

[5]  Amir AghaKouchak,et al.  A satellite-based global landslide model , 2013 .

[6]  Shi Pei-jun,et al.  Theory on disaster science and disaster dynamics , 2002 .

[7]  Huang Run-qiu,et al.  AFTER EFFECT OF GEOHAZARDS INDUCED BY THE WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE , 2011 .

[8]  Y. Hong,et al.  A global landslide catalog for hazard applications: method, results, and limitations , 2010 .

[9]  J. Coe,et al.  Landslide susceptibility from topography in Guatemala , 2004 .

[10]  W. Z. Savage,et al.  Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Commentary , 2008 .

[11]  Yang Chenglin,et al.  Mountain Disasters Induced by the Earthquake of May 12 in Wenchuan and the Disasters Mitigation , 2008 .

[12]  Yang Hong,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of NASA multi‐satellite precipitation analysis in global landslide hazard assessment , 2006 .

[13]  D. Petley Global patterns of loss of life from landslides , 2012 .

[14]  D. Varnes Landslide hazard zonation: A review of principles and practice , 1984 .

[15]  Chang-Jo Chung,et al.  Is Prediction of Future Landslides Possible with a GIS? , 2003 .

[16]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Spatial patterns of rainfall and shallow landslide susceptibility , 2009 .

[17]  Claudio Moraga,et al.  A diffusion-neural-network for learning from small samples , 2004, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[18]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Global landslide and avalanche hotspots , 2006 .