Low cost characterization of TOF range sensors resolution

The core of the paper is focused on the experimental characterization of four different 3D laser scanners based on Time of Flight principle, through the extraction of resolution, accuracy and uncertainty parameters from specifically designed 3D test objects. The testing process leads to four results: z-uncertainty, xy-resolution z-resolution and z-accuracy. The first is obtained by the evaluation of random residuals from the 3D capture of a planar target, the second from the scanner response to an abrupt z-jump, and the last two from direct evaluation of the image extracted by different geometric features progressively closer each other. The aim of this research is to suggest a low cost characterization process, mainly based on calibrated test object easy to duplicate, that allow an objective and reliable comparison between 3D TOF scanner performances.

[1]  Harald Sternberg,et al.  COMPARISON OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING SYSTEMS IN INDUSTRIAL AS-BUILT-DOCUMENTATION APPLICATIONS , 2007 .

[2]  Francois Blais,et al.  Evaluating laser range scanner lateral resolution in 3D metrology , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  D. Lichti,et al.  MODELLING SCATTERING DISTORTION IN 3D RANGE CAMERA , 2010 .

[4]  François Blais,et al.  Review of measurement quality metrics for range imaging , 2008, J. Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Stephan D. Weiss,et al.  Calibration of time-of-flight range imaging cameras , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  M. Levoy,et al.  An assessment of laser range measurement on marble surfaces , 2001 .

[7]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Low-cost characterization of 3D laser scanners , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Error Models and Propagation in Directly Georeferenced Terrestrial Laser Scanner Networks , 2005 .

[9]  R. Lange,et al.  Solid-state time-of-flight range camera , 2001 .

[10]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  TOF laser scanner characterization for low-range applications , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Dario Petri,et al.  Accuracy Performance of a Time-of-Flight CMOS Range Image Sensor System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  D. Falie,et al.  Further investigations on ToF cameras distance errors and their corrections. , 2008, 2008 4th European Conference on Circuits and Systems for Communications.

[13]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  CALIBRATION AND TESTING OF A TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNER , 2000 .

[14]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Performances evaluation of a low cost active sensor for Cultural Heritage documentation , 2007 .

[15]  Warren H. Stevenson,et al.  Performance characteristics of range sensors utilizing optical triangulation , 1992, Proceedings of the IEEE 1992 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference@m_NAECON 1992.

[16]  Wolfgang Boehler,et al.  Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy , 2005 .

[17]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Triangulation Based Range Sensors , 2010, Sensors.

[18]  Scott Robbins,et al.  Photogrammetric calibration and colorization of the SwissRanger SR-3100 3-D range imaging sensor , 2009 .

[19]  Francois Blais,et al.  TRACEABLE 3D IMAGING METROLOGY: EVALUATION OF 3D DIGITIZING TECHNIQUES IN A DEDICATED METROLOGY LABORATORY , 2007 .

[20]  Jafar Amiri Parian,et al.  INTEGRATED LASER SCANNER AND INTENSITY IMAGE CALIBRATION AND ACCURACY ASSESSMENT , 2005 .

[21]  Filiberto Chiabrando,et al.  Sensors for 3D Imaging: Metric Evaluation and Calibration of a CCD/CMOS Time-of-Flight Camera , 2009, Sensors.

[22]  Michael J. Cree,et al.  Characterization of modulated time-of-flight range image sensors , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[23]  Francois Blais,et al.  Proposed procedure for a distance protocol in support of ASTM-E57 standards activities on 3D imaging , 2009, Electronic Imaging.