The gold miner's dilemma: Use of information scent in cooperative and competitive information foraging

Abstract When searching for new information, do people focus their search on places not-yet discovered by others, or on places that others also focus on? Through a controlled experiment, we investigated heuristic rules that people adopt in social information search, a growing characteristic of how people find information in this hyperconnected world. Three people were connected online to simultaneously search for specific objects in multiple images, under either a cooperative or a competitive setting. They were provided with information about the current number of objects collected and the cumulative time spent on each image. People used such information to decide when to stop the current search and which image to explore next. Further, people paid more attention to others and distribute search efforts when cooperating, compared to when competing against others. Our findings highlight the heuristic rules that people adopt when searching in groups for new information.

[1]  Joshua B. Plotkin,et al.  Information gerrymandering and undemocratic decisions , 2019, Nature.

[2]  G. Marchionini,et al.  Awareness in collaborative information seeking , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Gordon Lightbody,et al.  Detection of seizures in intracranial EEG: UPenn and Mayo Clinic's Seizure Detection Challenge , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[4]  Takahiro Hara,et al.  A collaborative Web browsing system for multiple mobile users , 2004, Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PERCOM'06).

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The integration of social influence and reward: Computational approaches and neural evidence , 2017, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[7]  David P. Anderson,et al.  Scientists@Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation? , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[9]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[10]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Towards a model of understanding social search , 2008, SSM '08.

[11]  David G. Rand,et al.  The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[13]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  John A. Baron,et al.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk , 1993, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[15]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Understanding together: sensemaking in collaborative information seeking , 2010, CSCW '10.

[16]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines , 2004, The Information Society.

[17]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Collaborative Information Seeking: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[18]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach , 1991 .

[19]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Measuring the Value Of Information - An Asset Valuation Approach , 1999, ECIS.

[20]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[21]  Jonathan D. Nelson,et al.  Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision spaces , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[22]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  Unpacking the Exploration–Exploitation Tradeoff: A Synthesis of Human and Animal Literatures , 2015 .

[23]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Físchlár-DiamondTouch: collaborative video searching on a table , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[25]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  TeamSearch: comparing techniques for co-present collaborative search of digital media , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[26]  B A Huberman,et al.  Cooperative Solution of Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1991, Science.

[27]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power , 2009 .

[28]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  CoSearch: a system for co-located collaborative web search , 2008, CHI.

[29]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Collaborative information seeking in student group projects , 2016, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[30]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context: A study of two healthcare teams , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  Information artisans: patterns of result sharing by information searchers , 1993, COCS '93.

[33]  Oded Nov,et al.  The Effect of Exposure to Social Annotation on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior , 2016, CSCW.

[34]  Oded Nov,et al.  Exploring personality-targeted UI design in online social participation systems , 2013, CHI.

[35]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Rational Analyses of Information Foraging on the Web , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[38]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search , 2007, UIST.

[39]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Collaborative Information Seeking , 2015, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[40]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Learning where to look for a hidden target , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Collaborative Information Retrieval in an information-intensive domain , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[43]  Oded Nov,et al.  Development of a Mechatronics-Based Citizen Science Platform for Aquatic Environmental Monitoring , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[44]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Algorithmic mediation for collaborative exploratory search , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[45]  P. Todd,et al.  Patch leaving in humans: can a generalist adapt its rules to dispersal of items across patches? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  P. McCullagh.  Regression Models for Ordinal Data , 1980 .

[47]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  SNIF-ACT: A Cognitive Model of User Navigation on the World Wide Web , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..