Pacemaker interference by 60-Hz contact currents

Contact currents occur when a person touches conductive surfaces at different potentials, thereby completing a path for current flow through the body. Such currents provide an additional coupling mechanism between the human body and external low-frequency fields. The resulting fields induced in the body can cause interference with implanted cardiac pacemakers. Modern computing resources used in conjunction with millimeter-scale human body conductivity models make numerical modeling a viable technique for examining any such interference. An existing well-verified scalar-potential finite-difference frequency-domain code has recently been modified to allow for combined current and voltage electrode sources, as well as to allow for implanted wires. Here, this code is used to evaluate the potential for cardiac pacemaker interference by contact currents in a variety of configurations. These include current injection into either hand, and extraction via: 1) the opposite hand; 2) the soles of both feet; or 3) the opposite hand and both feet. Pacemaker generator placement in both the left and right pectoral areas is considered in conjunction with atrial and ventricular electrodes. In addition, the effects of realistically implanted unipolar pacemaker leads with typical lumped resistance values of either 20 k/spl Omega/ and 100 k/spl Omega/ are investigated. It is found that the 60-Hz contact current interference thresholds for typical sensitivity settings of unipolar cardiac pacemaker range from 24 to 45 /spl mu/A.. Voltage and electric field dosimetry are also used to provide crude threshold estimates for bipolar pacemaker interference. The estimated contact current thresholds range from 63 to 340 /spl mu/A for bipolar pacemakers.

[1]  A. Camm,et al.  The Effect of 50 Hz External Electrical Interference on Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Pacemaker interference by magnetic fields at power line frequencies , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Electric fields in the human body resulting from 60-Hz contact currents , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  A. Camm,et al.  The Response of Implanted Dual Chamber Pacemakers to 50 Hz Extraneous Electrical Interference , 1993, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[6]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Pacemaker interference and low-frequency electric induction in humans by external fields and electrodes , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  M A Stuchly,et al.  A comparison of 60 Hz uniform magnetic and electric induction in the human body. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  M. A. Stuchly,et al.  High-resolution organ dosimetry for human exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields , 1998 .

[10]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electropathology , 1998 .

[11]  M. Stuchly,et al.  Interaction of low-frequency electric and magnetic fields with the human body , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Richard Barrett,et al.  Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods , 1994, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics.

[13]  B. Nowak,et al.  Cardiac output in single-lead VDD pacing versus rate-matched VVIR pacing. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.