A conical-collared intramedullary stem can improve stress transfer and limit micromotion.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of collar geometry on stress transfer and micromotion in idealized models of a cementless implant having an intramedullary stem. BACKGROUND Intramedullary stems exist on several types of orthopaedic implants, including the femoral component of hip arthroplasties and segmental replacements used in the surgical treatment of a tumor or trauma in the diaphysis of a long bone. METHODS Using three-dimensional finite element analysis, we compared four idealized, straight-stemmed, axisymmetric prostheses: flat-collared (0 degrees), conical-collared (30 degrees and 60 degrees), and collarless tapered (80 degrees). We simulated axial and non-axial (20 degrees oblique) loads as well as non-ingrown and ingrown interface conditions. RESULTS Without bone ingrowth, stress transfer to bone adjacent to the collar increased with collar angle. Micromotion at the distal stem increased moderately with collar angle from 0 degrees through 60 degrees, then increased markedly from 60 degrees to 80 degrees. With simulated bony ingrowth, the effect of the collar was greatly reduced. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that the selection of collar angle represents a tradeoff between initial stress transfer and micromotion. Stems with conical collar angles in the range of 30-60 degrees can provide increased stress transfer compared to a flat collar design and reduced micromotion compared to a collarless tapered design.

[1]  W. Maloney,et al.  In vitro study of initial stability of a conical collared femoral component. , 1992, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  T P Harrigan,et al.  A finite element study of the effect of diametral interface gaps on the contact areas and pressures in uncemented cylindrical femoral total hip components. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  S. Kelley,et al.  Collar Versus Collarless Cemented HD-II Femoral Prostheses , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  R Huiskes,et al.  Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  W H Harris,et al.  Is It Advantageous to Strengthen the Cement‐Metal Interface and Use a Collar for Cemented Femoral Components of Total Hip Replacements? , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  D. Carter,et al.  A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  Engh Ca,et al.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. , 1988 .

[8]  R. Huiskes.  The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Bobyn Jd,et al.  The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  W H Harris,et al.  Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  R. H. Fitzgerald,et al.  Non-cemented total hip arthroplasty , 1987 .

[12]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Can Finite Element Models Detect Clinically Inferior Cemented Hip Implants? , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Å. Carlsson,et al.  A large collar increases neck resorption in total hip replacement. 204 hips evaluated during 5 years. , 1995, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  J. Pritchett.  Femoral Bone Loss Following Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  W. Hayes,et al.  Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  M J Fagan,et al.  Role of the collar on the femoral stem of cemented total hip replacements. , 1986, Journal of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  L. Whiteside,et al.  The effects of the collar on total hip femoral component subsidence. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  D. Bartel,et al.  Fundamental load transfer patterns for press-fit, surface-treated intramedullary fixation stems. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Stress analysis of the proximo-medial femur after total hip replacement. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[25]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. , 1973, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  S B Goodman,et al.  Design of the femoral component for cementless hip replacement: the surgeon's perspective. , 1997, American journal of orthopedics.