Technology competition in the internal combustion engine waste heat recovery: a patent landscape analysis

Abstract Fuel prices and tightening emission standards have challenged the dominance of internal combustion engines. As a response to this changed business context, the automotive industry has shown active interest in waste heat recovery technologies, which have seen rapid development in recent years. This paper uses a literature review and patent landscape analysis to study key emerging technologies in the field, namely, thermoelectric generators, and Rankine cycle and organic Rankine cycle systems. The state-of-the-art review highlights the challenges, advantages and future prospects of the selected technologies. The patent analysis reveals the leading countries, principal technological development indicators and most important actors active in the field. The results indicate a growing trend of patenting in all selected technologies. The United States and Japan are by far the most dominant countries in the waste heat recovery area, although their relative share of patent applications is declining. By applying a patent landscape approach, the study offers a quantitative perspective on current developments in waste heat recovery technology, provides indicators of future trends, and contributes to debate about technological competition in the automotive industry. Based on the conducted analyses, thermoelectric generators seems to be the most developed of the alternatives and closest to commercial application. Rankine cycle-based technologies, although less well developed, potentially offer greater environmental gains and better efficiency than thermoelectric generators. The study provides valuable information for stakeholders interested in waste heat recovery technologies and gives policymakers perspectives regarding different technological options in development of cleaner engine solutions.

[1]  Martin Meyer,et al.  What is Special about Patent Citations? Differences between Scientific and Patent Citations , 2000, Scientometrics.

[2]  T. Magnusson,et al.  Strategic niche management from a business perspective : taking cleaner vehicle technologies from prototype to series production , 2014 .

[3]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  Assortment planning of automotive products with considerations for economic and environmental impacts of technology selection , 2014 .

[4]  Robert van den Hoed,et al.  Sources of radical technological innovation: the emergence of fuel cell technology in the automotive industry , 2007 .

[5]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Dominance in the prototyping phase - The case of hydrogen passenger cars , 2012 .

[6]  Chen-Yuan Liu,et al.  Forecasting the development of the biped robot walking technique in Japan through S-curve model analysis , 2009, Scientometrics.

[7]  E. Stefanakos,et al.  A REVIEW OF THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES AND WORKING FLUIDS FOR THE CONVERSION OF LOW-GRADE HEAT , 2010 .

[8]  Agostino Gambarotta,et al.  Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) bottoming with Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) , 2010 .

[9]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[10]  C. Thiel,et al.  Cost and CO2 Aspects of Future Vehicle Options in Europe under New Energy Policy Scenarios , 2010 .

[11]  Costante Mario Invernizzi,et al.  Heat recovery from Diesel engines: A thermodynamic comparison between Kalina and ORC cycles , 2010 .

[12]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Reducing automotive emissions—The potentials of combustion engine technologies and the power of policy , 2012 .

[13]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Traces of Prior Art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents , 2006, Scientometrics.

[14]  Rahman Saidur,et al.  Technologies to recover exhaust heat from internal combustion engines , 2012 .

[15]  M. A. Karri,et al.  Exhaust energy conversion by thermoelectric generator: Two case studies , 2011 .

[16]  Nikola Stosic,et al.  COST EFFECTIVE SMALL SCALE ORC SYSTEMS FOR POWER RECOVERY FROM LOW GRADE HEAT SOURCES , 2006 .

[17]  Juha Honkatukia,et al.  A thermodynamic analysis of waste heat recovery from reciprocating engine power plants by means of Organic Rankine Cycles , 2014 .

[18]  Christopher Depcik,et al.  Review of organic Rankine cycles for internal combustion engine exhaust waste heat recovery , 2013 .

[19]  Antti Uusitalo,et al.  Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems: From the Concept to Current Technology, Applications, and an Outlook to the Future , 2015 .

[20]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Thermoelectrics: a review of present and potential applications , 2003 .

[21]  Eleonora Annunziata,et al.  Technological trajectories in the automotive industry: are hydrogen technologies still a possibility? , 2014 .

[22]  Alan Pilkington,et al.  The electric vehicle:: Patent data as indicators of technological development , 2002 .

[23]  Nathalie Sick,et al.  Identifying trends in battery technologies with regard to electric mobility: evidence from patenting activities along and across the battery value chain , 2015 .

[24]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs) : a patent data analysis. , 2006 .

[25]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: Innovation path creation through co- evolution of supply and demand , 2010 .

[26]  Sujit Das,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental evaluation of downsized vs. lightweight material automotive engines , 2014 .

[27]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Thermo-economic optimization of waste heat recovery Organic Rankine Cycles , 2011 .

[28]  Walter Knecht,et al.  Diesel engine development in view of reduced emission standards , 2008 .

[29]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated , 2012 .

[30]  David Michael Rowe,et al.  Thermoelectrics, an environmentally-friendly source of electrical power , 1999 .

[31]  Nicolas van Zeebroeck,et al.  The puzzle of patent value indicators , 2011 .

[32]  Paul Andre Henri Francois Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Exploring innovation in the automotive industry: new technologies for cleaner cars , 2010 .

[33]  Minggao Ouyang,et al.  Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery , 2011 .

[34]  Scott A. Miers,et al.  Review of Waste Heat Recovery Mechanisms for Internal Combustion Engines , 2014 .

[35]  J. I. Ghojel,et al.  Waste heat recovery from the exhaust of low-power diesel engine using thermoelectric generators , 2001, Proceedings ICT2001. 20 International Conference on Thermoelectrics (Cat. No.01TH8589).

[36]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery , 2004 .

[37]  G. Angelino,et al.  Perspectives for Waste Heat Recovery by Means of Organic Fluid Cycles , 1973 .

[38]  L. Bell Cooling, Heating, Generating Power, and Recovering Waste Heat with Thermoelectric Systems , 2008, Science.

[39]  Alex M. K. P. Taylor,et al.  Science review of internal combustion engines , 2008 .

[40]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of keyword search strategy for patent identification , 2013 .

[41]  K. T. Chau,et al.  An automotive thermoelectric–photovoltaic hybrid energy system using maximum power point tracking , 2011 .

[42]  A. Kayal,et al.  Measuring the Pace of Technological Progress , 1999 .

[43]  Xiaodong Zhang,et al.  Overview of Thermoelectric Generation for Hybrid Vehicles , 2008 .

[44]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[45]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[46]  Peter Erskine Wells,et al.  U-turn: the rise and demise of the automobile industry , 2007 .