Comparison of prostate biopsy protocols using 3D computer simulation
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Moul | S. Mun | J. Zeng | J. Bauer | S. Mun | K. Sesterhenn | J. Bauer | K.A. Sesterhenn
[1] David F. Rogers,et al. Mathematical elements for computer graphics , 1976 .
[2] N. Breslow,et al. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies. , 1987, IARC scientific publications.
[3] M. Terris,et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.
[4] G. Herman,et al. 3D Imaging In Medicine , 1991 .
[5] Louis R Kavoussi,et al. Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer. , 1994, The Journal of urology.
[6] T. Stamey,et al. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. , 1995, Urology.
[7] G. D. Taylor,et al. Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsies. , 1995, Urology.
[8] M W Kattan,et al. Distinguishing clinically important from unimportant prostate cancers before treatment: value of systematic biopsies. , 1996, The Journal of urology.
[9] Jianhua Xuan,et al. A deformable surface-spine model for 3-D surface registration , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.
[10] D L McCullough,et al. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. , 1997, The Journal of urology.
[11] Jianhua Xuan,et al. Surface reconstruction and visualization of the surgical prostate model , 1997, Medical Imaging.