Seven Metaphors to Understand Digital Twins of Built Assets
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Stephen L. Vargo,et al. Service-dominant logic 2025 , 2017 .
[2] Stephen L. Vargo,et al. Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .
[3] Liz Moor,et al. Design and Creativity: Policy, Management and Practice , 2009 .
[4] Benjamin Lindemann,et al. An architecture of an Intelligent Digital Twin in a Cyber-Physical Production System , 2019, Autom..
[5] Daniela E. Damian,et al. Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research , 2008, Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering.
[6] Janice Singer,et al. Studying Software Engineers: Data Collection Techniques for Software Field Studies , 2005, Empirical Software Engineering.
[7] Kari Tammi,et al. A Feature-Based Framework for Structuring Industrial Digital Twins , 2020, IEEE Access.
[8] Eliezer Colina,et al. A System of Systems Digital Twin to Support Life Time Management and Life Extension of Subsea Production Systems , 2019, OCEANS 2019 - Marseille.
[9] Kari Smolander,et al. Inter-organizational Integration in the AEC/FM Industry - Exploring the "Addressed" and "Unaddressed" Information Exchange Needs Between Stakeholders , 2019, CAiSE.
[10] Abdulmotaleb El Saddik,et al. C2PS: A Digital Twin Architecture Reference Model for the Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems , 2017, IEEE Access.
[11] David Gelernter,et al. Mirror worlds - or the day software puts the universe in a shoebox: how it will happen and what it will mean , 1991 .
[12] Marc Stickdorn,et al. This is service design thinking : basics--tools--cases : 領域横断的アプローチによるビジネスモデルの設計 , 2012 .
[13] Angelo Corallo,et al. BIM and PLM Associations in Current Literature , 2017, PLM.
[14] L. Yeomans. Qualitative methods in business research , 2017 .
[15] Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al. Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .
[16] Sebastian Herold,et al. From Software Systems to Complex Software Ecosystems: Model- and Constraint-Based Engineering of Ecosystems , 2013, Perspectives on the Future of Software Engineering.
[17] Chimay J. Anumba,et al. Knowledge management in the architecture, engineering and construction industry , 2002 .
[18] Stephen L. Vargo,et al. Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange , 2011 .
[19] Mike Bresnen. Keeping it real? Constituting partnering through boundary objects , 2010 .
[20] Per Runeson,et al. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering , 2009, Empirical Software Engineering.
[21] David Bryde,et al. The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2013 .
[22] Bilal Succar,et al. Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .
[23] Fei Tao,et al. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.
[24] Lluvia Vega,et al. DEC , 2020, Catalysis from A to Z.
[25] Jukka Alvesalo,et al. Global business process development in a virtual community of practice , 2003 .
[26] Christophe Cruz,et al. IFC and building lifecycle management , 2008 .
[27] Frank Schultmann,et al. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings — Literature review and future needs , 2014 .
[28] J. Coe,et al. OCT , 2021, JACC Case Reports.
[29] Stephen L. Vargo,et al. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .
[30] Michael W. Grieves,et al. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems , 2017 .
[31] Robert K. Yin,et al. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods , 2017 .
[32] Jörg Becker,et al. Bridging the Gap Between Manufacturing and Service Through IT-Based Boundary Objects , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[33] Richard Fellows,et al. Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces , 2012 .
[34] Yacine Rezgui,et al. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research , 2020, Automation in Construction.
[35] John W. Creswell,et al. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 1966 .
[36] James Moyne,et al. A Requirements Driven Digital Twin Framework: Specification and Opportunities , 2020, IEEE Access.
[37] Daniel Losch,et al. A navigation framework for digital twins of factories based on building information modeling , 2017, 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).
[38] Omer San,et al. Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective , 2019, IEEE Access.
[39] Carolyn B. Seaman,et al. Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering , 1999, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..
[40] Rahul C. Basole,et al. Interfirm Collaboration and Firm Value in Software Ecosystems: Evidence From Cloud Computing , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[41] Stephen L. Vargo,et al. It's all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market , 2011 .
[42] Jennifer Whyte,et al. How digitizing building information transforms the built environment , 2017 .
[43] A. Parasuraman,et al. Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing , 1985 .
[44] D. Gann,et al. Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .
[45] Long Chen,et al. Semi-automatic geometric digital twinning for existing buildings based on images and CAD drawings , 2020 .
[46] Fei Tao,et al. Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison , 2018, IEEE Access.
[47] K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[48] Abdulmotaleb El Saddik,et al. Digital Twins: The Convergence of Multimedia Technologies , 2018, IEEE MultiMedia.
[49] B. Saelens,et al. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.
[50] Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al. Organizational assimilation of complex technologies: an empirical study of component-based software development , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[51] Susan L Handy,et al. How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.
[52] Raymond E. Levitt,et al. Computer Integration: Reducing Fragmentation in AEC Industry , 1989 .
[53] Stefan Boschert,et al. Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect , 2016 .
[54] Akira Takeishi,et al. Bridging inter‐ and intra‐firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 2001 .
[55] S. L. Star,et al. This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .
[56] Siavash H. Khajavi,et al. Digital Twin: Vision, Benefits, Boundaries, and Creation for Buildings , 2019, IEEE Access.
[57] Juuso Autiosalo. Platform for industrial internet and digital twin focused education, research, and innovation: Ilmatar the overhead crane , 2018, 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).
[58] E Papadonikolaki,et al. Inter- and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM , 2017 .
[59] John Tookey,et al. Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges , 2017 .
[60] Charles J. Kibert,et al. Construction ecology and metabolism: natural system analogues for a sustainable built environment , 2000 .