Seven Metaphors to Understand Digital Twins of Built Assets

Digital twins have raised the attention of practitioners in the fields of Architecture, Engineering and Construction, and Facilities Management (AEC/FM). The term broadly refers to the cyber part of cyber-physical systems used for representing and managing real-world assets. This qualitative study explores how Finnish AEC/FM practitioners describe digital twins of assets in the built environment. Our findings are primarily derived from the interpretive analysis of semi-structured interviews with project managers and C-level executives during 2018 and 2019. The results of this analysis are discussed within the existing literature about digital twins, complex software ecosystems, and Service-Dominant (S-D) logic. We observed that digital twins were often explained using simple metaphors that could be easily understood by practitioners. We identified seven of such metaphors, each associated with a key attribute of digital twins. We argue that digital twins are the basis of complex software ecosystems, resulting from the increased expectations of AEC/FM stakeholders about the role of Building Information Modeling and other software solutions in their daily operations. Under an S-D logic perspective, digital twins are a resource applied by multiple interdependent actors to integrate information, co-create value for their entire network, and jointly deliver new products or services.

[1]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic 2025 , 2017 .

[2]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[3]  Liz Moor,et al.  Design and Creativity: Policy, Management and Practice , 2009 .

[4]  Benjamin Lindemann,et al.  An architecture of an Intelligent Digital Twin in a Cyber-Physical Production System , 2019, Autom..

[5]  Daniela E. Damian,et al.  Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research , 2008, Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering.

[6]  Janice Singer,et al.  Studying Software Engineers: Data Collection Techniques for Software Field Studies , 2005, Empirical Software Engineering.

[7]  Kari Tammi,et al.  A Feature-Based Framework for Structuring Industrial Digital Twins , 2020, IEEE Access.

[8]  Eliezer Colina,et al.  A System of Systems Digital Twin to Support Life Time Management and Life Extension of Subsea Production Systems , 2019, OCEANS 2019 - Marseille.

[9]  Kari Smolander,et al.  Inter-organizational Integration in the AEC/FM Industry - Exploring the "Addressed" and "Unaddressed" Information Exchange Needs Between Stakeholders , 2019, CAiSE.

[10]  Abdulmotaleb El Saddik,et al.  C2PS: A Digital Twin Architecture Reference Model for the Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems , 2017, IEEE Access.

[11]  David Gelernter,et al.  Mirror worlds - or the day software puts the universe in a shoebox: how it will happen and what it will mean , 1991 .

[12]  Marc Stickdorn,et al.  This is service design thinking : basics--tools--cases : 領域横断的アプローチによるビジネスモデルの設計 , 2012 .

[13]  Angelo Corallo,et al.  BIM and PLM Associations in Current Literature , 2017, PLM.

[14]  L. Yeomans Qualitative methods in business research , 2017 .

[15]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[16]  Sebastian Herold,et al.  From Software Systems to Complex Software Ecosystems: Model- and Constraint-Based Engineering of Ecosystems , 2013, Perspectives on the Future of Software Engineering.

[17]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Knowledge management in the architecture, engineering and construction industry , 2002 .

[18]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange , 2011 .

[19]  Mike Bresnen Keeping it real? Constituting partnering through boundary objects , 2010 .

[20]  Per Runeson,et al.  Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering , 2009, Empirical Software Engineering.

[21]  David Bryde,et al.  The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2013 .

[22]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .

[23]  Fei Tao,et al.  Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[24]  Lluvia Vega,et al.  DEC , 2020, Catalysis from A to Z.

[25]  Jukka Alvesalo,et al.  Global business process development in a virtual community of practice , 2003 .

[26]  Christophe Cruz,et al.  IFC and building lifecycle management , 2008 .

[27]  Frank Schultmann,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings — Literature review and future needs , 2014 .

[28]  J. Coe,et al.  OCT , 2021, JACC Case Reports.

[29]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[30]  Michael W. Grieves,et al.  Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems , 2017 .

[31]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods , 2017 .

[32]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Manufacturing and Service Through IT-Based Boundary Objects , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[33]  Richard Fellows,et al.  Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces , 2012 .

[34]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research , 2020, Automation in Construction.

[35]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 1966 .

[36]  James Moyne,et al.  A Requirements Driven Digital Twin Framework: Specification and Opportunities , 2020, IEEE Access.

[37]  Daniel Losch,et al.  A navigation framework for digital twins of factories based on building information modeling , 2017, 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[38]  Omer San,et al.  Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective , 2019, IEEE Access.

[39]  Carolyn B. Seaman,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering , 1999, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[40]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration and Firm Value in Software Ecosystems: Evidence From Cloud Computing , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  It's all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market , 2011 .

[42]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  How digitizing building information transforms the built environment , 2017 .

[43]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing , 1985 .

[44]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[45]  Long Chen,et al.  Semi-automatic geometric digital twinning for existing buildings based on images and CAD drawings , 2020 .

[46]  Fei Tao,et al.  Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison , 2018, IEEE Access.

[47]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[48]  Abdulmotaleb El Saddik,et al.  Digital Twins: The Convergence of Multimedia Technologies , 2018, IEEE MultiMedia.

[49]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[50]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Organizational assimilation of complex technologies: an empirical study of component-based software development , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[51]  Susan L Handy,et al.  How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[52]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Computer Integration: Reducing Fragmentation in AEC Industry , 1989 .

[53]  Stefan Boschert,et al.  Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect , 2016 .

[54]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Bridging inter‐ and intra‐firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 2001 .

[55]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[56]  Siavash H. Khajavi,et al.  Digital Twin: Vision, Benefits, Boundaries, and Creation for Buildings , 2019, IEEE Access.

[57]  Juuso Autiosalo Platform for industrial internet and digital twin focused education, research, and innovation: Ilmatar the overhead crane , 2018, 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[58]  E Papadonikolaki,et al.  Inter- and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM , 2017 .

[59]  John Tookey,et al.  Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges , 2017 .

[60]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Construction ecology and metabolism: natural system analogues for a sustainable built environment , 2000 .