When a major failure happens in a healthcare organisation in the British NHS an inquiry of some kind usually ensues, tasked with finding out what happened, diagnosing the problems or causes of the failure, and making recommendations for changes in policy or practice which would prevent or make such a failure less likely in the future. The inquiry is akin to an organisational post-mortem, intended to move beyond a simple description of the symptoms and eVects of the failure and to provide a more insightful analysis of its pathology and aetiology. While the symptoms of failure are often clinical in nature—poor standards of care, avoidable mortality and morbidity, distressed patients and their families, and so on—the pathology of failure is usually organisational, concerned with things such as organisational leadership, management structures and systems, organisational culture, interprofessional relationships and teamwork. This paper presents an analysis of a recent and tragic example of failure at an acute hospital in the south west of England, and explores what lessons it oVers for those involved in quality improvement and clinical governance in health care.
[1]
D. Irvine.
Royal Commission on the National Health Service.
,
1976,
Midwife, health visitor & community nurse.
[2]
R J Maxwell,et al.
Quality assessment in health.
,
1984,
British medical journal.
[3]
D Blumenthal,et al.
A report card on continuous quality improvement.
,
1998,
The Milbank quarterly.
[4]
D. Taylor.
Quality and professionalism in health care: a review of current initiatives in the NHS
,
1996,
BMJ.
[5]
G. Teasdale.
Learning from Bristol: report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995
,
2002,
British journal of neurosurgery.
[6]
N. Redfern,et al.
Revalidating doctors - Ensuring standards, securing the future
,
2001
.
[7]
Donlin M. Long.
Silver blaze
,
2001
.
[8]
C. Shaw.
Quality assurance in the United Kingdom.
,
1987,
Australian clinical review.