Probe-Specific Procedure to Estimate Sensitivity and Detection Limits for 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Due to low fluorine background signal in vivo, 19F is a good marker to study the fate of exogenous molecules by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using equilibrium nuclear spin polarization schemes. Since 19F MRI applications require high sensitivity, it can be important to assess experimental feasibility during the design stage already by estimating the minimum detectable fluorine concentration. Here we propose a simple method for the calibration of MRI hardware, providing sensitivity estimates for a given scanner and coil configuration. An experimental “calibration factor” to account for variations in coil configuration and hardware set-up is specified. Once it has been determined in a calibration experiment, the sensitivity of an experiment or, alternatively, the minimum number of required spins or the minimum marker concentration can be estimated without the need for a pilot experiment. The definition of this calibration factor is derived based on standard equations for the sensitivity in magnetic resonance, yet the method is not restricted by the limited validity of these equations, since additional instrument-dependent factors are implicitly included during calibration. The method is demonstrated using MR spectroscopy and imaging experiments with different 19F samples, both paramagnetically and susceptibility broadened, to approximate a range of realistic environments.

[1]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Dual-frequency calcium-responsive MRI agents. , 2014, Chemistry.

[2]  P. Jakob,et al.  Monitoring of Monocyte Recruitment in Reperfused Myocardial Infarction With Intramyocardial Hemorrhage and Microvascular Obstruction by Combined Fluorine 19 and Proton Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2013, Circulation.

[3]  A. Rodriguez,et al.  Theoretical signal-to-noise ratio of a slotted surface coil for magnetic resonance imaging , 2011, 1102.1761.

[4]  J. Bulte,et al.  Fluorine (19F) MRS and MRI in biomedicine , 2011, NMR in biomedicine.

[5]  A. Haase,et al.  Snapshot flash mri. applications to t1, t2, and chemical‐shift imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  D. Shaw,et al.  Validating Excised Rodent Lungs for Functional Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Markus Wälchli,et al.  Paramagnetic relaxation-based 19f MRI probe to detect protease activity. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  Xiao-Hong Zhu,et al.  In vivo 31P MRS of human brain at high/ultrahigh fields: a quantitative comparison of NMR detection sensitivity and spectral resolution between 4 T and 7 T. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  N. Logothetis,et al.  A smart (19) F and (1) H MRI probe with self-immolative linker as a versatile tool for detection of enzymes. , 2012, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[11]  Arend Heerschap,et al.  (19)F MRI for quantitative in vivo cell tracking. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[12]  W. Edelstein,et al.  The intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio in NMR imaging , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  S. Caruthers,et al.  19F magnetic resonance imaging for stem/progenitor cell tracking with multiple unique perfluorocarbon nanobeacons , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  Eric T Ahrens,et al.  In vivo imaging platform for tracking immunotherapeutic cells , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  A new paradigm for high‐sensitivity 19F magnetic resonance imaging of perfluorooctylbromide , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Shelton D Caruthers,et al.  Improved quantitative 19F MR molecular imaging with flip angle calibration and B1‐mapping compensation , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  K. Stupic,et al.  Quadrupolar relaxation of hyperpolarized krypton-83 as a probe for surfaces. , 2006, Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance.

[18]  R. Mason,et al.  New frontiers and developing applications in 19F NMR. , 2013, Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

[19]  Ralph P. Mason,et al.  New Frontiers and Developing Applications in 19F NMR , 2014 .

[20]  K. Pruessmann,et al.  Noise figure characterization of preamplifiers at NMR frequencies. , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[21]  P. Jakob,et al.  In vivo imaging of inflammation in the peripheral nervous system by 19F MRI , 2011, Experimental Neurology.

[22]  Louis-S. Bouchard,et al.  Feature-Preserving Noise Removal , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  P. Lauterbur,et al.  The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples , 1979 .

[24]  Klaas Nicolay,et al.  Quantitative (1)H MRI, (19)F MRI, and (19)F MRS of cell-internalized perfluorocarbon paramagnetic nanoparticles. , 2011, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[25]  Rolf Schubert,et al.  Probing different perfluorocarbons for in vivo inflammation imaging by 19F MRI: image reconstruction, biological half‐lives and sensitivity , 2014, NMR in biomedicine.

[26]  Mathias Hoehn,et al.  In Vivo Tracking of Human Neural Stem Cells with 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  Rolf Schubert,et al.  In Vivo Monitoring of Inflammation After Cardiac and Cerebral Ischemia by Fluorine Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Circulation.

[28]  M. Shirakawa,et al.  Dual-function probe to detect protease activity for fluorescence measurement and 19F MRI. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  K. Gilbert,et al.  Tracking the Fate of Stem Cell Implants with Fluorine-19 MRI , 2015, PloS one.

[31]  Mathias Hoehn,et al.  Labeling cells for in vivo tracking using (19)F MRI. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[32]  P. Jakob,et al.  Imaging of Intratumoral Inflammation during Oncolytic Virotherapy of Tumors by 19F-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  B. Choe,et al.  Development of a solenoid RF coil for animal imaging in 3 T high-magnetic-field MRI. , 2008, Scanning.

[34]  Society of magnetic resonance in medicine , 1990 .

[35]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  J. R. Singer,et al.  Resolution and signal-to-noise relationships in NMR imaging in the human body. , 1980, Journal of physics E: Scientific instruments.

[37]  J. Granwehr.  Multiplicative or t1 Noise in NMR Spectroscopy , 2007 .

[38]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions , 1987 .

[39]  D I Hoult,et al.  The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment. 1976. , 1976, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[40]  R. Mason,et al.  Comparison of 1H blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) and 19F MRI to investigate tumor oxygenation , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.