Towards a conversational culture? How participants establish strategies for co-ordinating chat postings in the context of in-service training

Within the research field of computer-mediated communication (CMC), extensive attention has been paid to the differences between CMC and spoken conversation, particularly in terms of sequential structure. In this study, the aim is to analyse how participants maintain continuity and handle discontinuities in institutionally arranged, computer-mediated communication. The empirical material consists of chat log files from in-service training courses for professionals in the food production industry. In the chat sessions we analysed, participants initially had some problems in co-ordinating their postings, that is, keeping track of the discussion’s threading.We also found, however, that methods for co-ordinating postings rather quickly were established among the participants. Two methods for making recognizable how postings were to be read were common in the material: 1) the use of personal names to address a specific participant, and 2) recycling part of the content of a previous posting or reformulating the content in the posting addressed in recognizable ways. We also found an emerging norm in their interaction: that of waiting for one’s turn.

[1]  Kris M. Markman “So What Shall We Talk About” , 2009 .

[2]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication , 1999 .

[3]  Kris M. Markman,et al.  Computer-mediated conversation: the organization of talk in chat-based virtual team meetings , 2006 .

[4]  D. Stein,et al.  Chat and conversation: a case of transmedial stability? , 2004 .

[5]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Online discourse in a teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in a visual medium , 2003 .

[6]  Malin Sveningsson Creating a sense of community : Experiences from a Swedish web chat , 2001 .

[7]  Murat Perit Çakir,et al.  Reading's Work: The Mechanisms of Online Chat as Social Interaction , 2007 .

[8]  James Simpson Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse , 2005 .

[9]  C. Werry Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat , 1996 .

[10]  E. Schegloff Sequence Organization In Interaction , 2007 .

[11]  Alan Zemel Texts-in-interaction: collaborative problem-solving in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication , 2005, CSCL.

[12]  B. Rogoff Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[13]  Susan C. Herring Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  A. H. Wold,et al.  On the Dialogical Basis of Meaning: Inquiries Into Ragnar Rommetveit's Writings on Language, Thought, and Communication , 2003, Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal.

[15]  Phillip R. Morrow,et al.  Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: some discourse features , 2006 .

[16]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .