Information Policy and Social Media: Framing Government—Citizen Web 2.0 Interactions

This chapter explores the intersections of information policy and government use of social media to interact with members of the public, using the policies and initiatives of the United States federal government as a case study. Following a discussion of the opportunities and challenges that social media presents to governments as a means to interact with its citizens, this chapter details key policy instruments related to government use of social media and the access issues that these policies do not adequately address. This chapter then examines the ways in which access perspectives already used in different areas of policy and design values implemented in various e-government projects present opportunities to frame government use of social media in a manner that would be inclusive of as many members of the public as possible. This chapter concludes by presenting ways in which policy could shape more inclusive use of social media by governments.

[1]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[2]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Universal Usability , 2000, UBIQ.

[3]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and American Democracy: Contents , 2003 .

[4]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  E-government around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Tomoko Kanayama.  Leaving It Up to the Industry: People With Disabilities and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[6]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power , 2003 .

[7]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Information and equity , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  P. Jaeger,et al.  Social Information Behavior and the Democratic Process: Information Poverty, Normative Behavior, and Electronic Government in the United States , 2004 .

[9]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal , 2006 .

[10]  E. Hargittai,et al.  The disability divide in internet access and use , 2006 .

[11]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Latinos Online: Hispanics with Lower Levels of Education and English Proficiency Remain Largely Disconnected from the Internet. , 2007 .

[12]  R. Zeff,et al.  Universal design across the curriculum , 2007 .

[13]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Sheryl Burgstahler,et al.  Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice. Second Edition. , 2008 .

[15]  Eileen M. Trauth.  The Information Revolution and World Politics , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  J. Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[17]  John A. Shuler,et al.  Implications of harmonizing the future of the federal depository library program within e-government principles and policies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Adrian Mackenzie.  Wirelessness: Radical Empiricism in Network Cultures , 2010 .

[19]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Social Media Technology and Government Transparency , 2010, Computer.

[20]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating User-centered and Citizen-centered E-government , 2010, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[21]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Agenda Setting in a Digital Age: Tracking Attention to California Proposition 8 in Social Media, Online News and Conventional News , 2010 .

[22]  John A. Shuler,et al.  The Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP), Academic Libraries, and Access to Government Information , 2010 .

[23]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2010 .

[24]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Cyberinfrastructure for Social Action on National Priorities , 2010, Computer.

[25]  Alison Powell,et al.  The essential internet: Digital exclusion in low-income American communities , 2010 .

[26]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Responsibility Rolls Down: Public Libraries and the Social and Policy Obligations of Ensuring Access to E-government and Government Information , 2011, Public Libr. Q..

[28]  Philip M. Turner,et al.  IMPACT in Public Libraries: Initiative to Measure Personnel Assimilation of Computer-mediated Training , 2011, Public Libr. Q..

[29]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Values in design , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[30]  P. Jaeger.  Disability and the Internet: Confronting a Digital Divide , 2011 .

[31]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Are separate interfaces inherently unequal?: an evaluation with blind users of the usability of two interfaces for a social networking platform , 2011, iConference.

[32]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Understanding Online Community User Participation: A Social Influence Perspective , 2011, Internet Res..

[33]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Chapter 2 – Social Media: New Technologies of Collaboration , 2011 .

[34]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The Intersection of Public Policy and Public Access: Digital Divides, Digital Literacy, Digital Inclusion, and Public Libraries , 2012, Public Libr. Q..

[36]  Shalin Hai-Jew.  Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2012 .

[37]  Jeremy Hunsinger,et al.  The Social Media Handbook , 2013 .