How to select stimuli for environmental sound research and where to find them

A major methodological challenge in environmental sound research is to select appropriate stimuli. When an experiment involves a large number of sound sources, making custom recordings or producing sounds live is frequently impractical or, for certain sounds, impossible. Existing databases of environmental sound recordings provide a researcher with a useful alternative. However, finding and selecting suitable sounds in such databases can be difficult because of the great variety of sounds present, poor documentation, questionable recording quality, and required purchasing costs. This article describes a number of practical issues to consider during the stimulus selection process, offers a preliminary compilation of existing resources for obtaining environmental sound recordings, provides some normative perceptual data that can be used as a reference for selecting stimuli and evaluating performance, and lists required characteristics and structural aspects of a research-oriented environmental sound database.

[1]  Robert J. Logan,et al.  Perception of acoustic source characteristics: walking sounds. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Brian Gygi,et al.  Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Perry R. Cook,et al.  Real Sound Synthesis for Interactive Applications , 2002 .

[4]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Identifying the sources of environmental sounds with a varying number of spectral channels , 2003 .

[5]  William W. Gaver What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[6]  M. Fabiani,et al.  Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: effects of age and dementia. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[7]  J. Ballas Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds , 1993 .

[8]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  L. Milgrom The sound of two hands clapping: , 2005, Homeopathy.

[10]  L L Myers,et al.  Detection and recognition of octave-band sound effects. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  B. Repp The sound of two hands clapping: an exploratory study. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Marcell,et al.  Confrontation Naming of Environmental Sounds , 2000, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[13]  Laurie M. Heller,et al.  When sound effects are better than the real thing , 2002 .

[14]  P A Cabe,et al.  Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filling. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D K Kessler,et al.  Analysis and Revision of the Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) Battery , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[16]  C. Petten,et al.  Conceptual relationships between spoken words and environmental sounds: Event-related brain potential measures , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Interpreting the Language of Environmental Sounds , 1987 .

[18]  C A Fowler,et al.  Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: rate normalization and nonspeech perception. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  David Friedman,et al.  Effect of Sound Familiarity on the Event-Related Potentials Elicited by Novel Environmental Sounds , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  Daniel Patrick Whittlesey Ellis,et al.  Prediction-driven computational auditory scene analysis , 1996 .

[21]  C. Carello,et al.  Perception of Object Length by Sound , 1998 .

[22]  D. Freed,et al.  Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive sound events. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  W H Warren,et al.  Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: a case study in ecological acoustics. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  P Etévenon,et al.  An ERD mapping study of the neurocognitive processes involved in the perceptual and semantic analysis of environmental sounds and words. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  E. A. Bjork The perceived quality of natural sounds , 1985 .