Affordances and the Body: An Intentional Analysis of Gibson's Ecological Approach to Visual Perception

[1]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment? , 1955, Psychological review.

[2]  W. Schiff.  PERCEPTION OF IMPENDING COLLISION: A STUDY OF VISUALLY DIRECTED AVOIDANT BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Psychological monographs.

[3]  Harry Heft.  What Heil is Missing in Gibson: A Reply , 1980 .

[4]  M. Turvey,et al.  Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981) , 1981, Cognition.

[5]  S. Wilcox,et al.  What Gibson isn't missing after all: A reply to Heil , 1981 .

[6]  W. G. Noble,et al.  Gibsonian Theory and the Pragmatist Perspective , 1981 .

[7]  E. Reed,et al.  Is Perception Blind , 1981 .

[8]  Incommensurability and the “Omission” in Gibson's Theory: A Second Reply to Heil , 1982 .

[9]  Harry Heft,et al.  Ecological and Phenomenological Contributions to the Psychology of Perception , 1982 .

[10]  John Shotter,et al.  “Duality of Structure” and “Intentionality” in an Ecological Psychology , 1983 .

[11]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Aaron Ben-Ze'ev,et al.  The Kantian Revolution in Perception , 1984 .

[13]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.