A linear dominance hierarchy among clones in chimeras of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum

Abstract Amoebae from different clones of Dictyostelium discoideum aggregate into a common slug, which migrates towards light for dispersal, then forms a fruiting body consisting of a somatic, dead stalk, holding up a head of living spores. Contributions of two clones in a chimera to spore and stalk are often unequal, with one clone taking advantage of the other's stalk contribution. To determine whether there was a hierarchy of exploitation among clones, we competed all possible pairs among seven clones and measured their relative representation in the prespore and prestalk stages and in the final spore stage. We found a clear linear hierarchy at the final spore stage, but not at earlier stages. These results suggest that there is either a single principal mechanism or additive effects for differential contribution to the spore, and that it involves more than spore/stalk competition.

[1]  M. Riley,et al.  The ecological role of bacteriocins in bacterial competition. , 1999, Trends in microbiology.

[2]  R. Grosberg,et al.  The genetic control and consequences of kin recognition by the larvae of a colonial marine invertebrate , 1986, Nature.

[3]  L. Buss,et al.  Competitive Networks: Nontransitive Competitive Relationships in Cryptic Coral Reef Environments , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[4]  R. Gomer,et al.  Cell-autonomous determination of cell-type choice in Dictyostelium development by cell-cycle phase. , 1987, Science.

[5]  S. Stephenson,et al.  Vertebrates as vectors of cellular slime moulds in temperate forests , 1992 .

[6]  M. Carroll.  The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press , 1970 .

[7]  R. Kessin.  Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity , 2001 .

[8]  R. Kay,et al.  Cross-induction of cell types in Dictyostelium: evidence that DIF-1 is made by prespore cells. , 2001, Development.

[9]  R. Lenski,et al.  Developmental cheating in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus , 2000, Nature.

[10]  D. M. Huffman,et al.  ENGULFMENT AND ANASTOMOSIS IN THE CELLULAR SLIME MOLDS (ACRASIALES) , 1964 .

[11]  Michael C. Appleby,et al.  The probability of linearity in hierarchies , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  I. Weissman,et al.  A Colonial Invertebrate Species that Displays a Hierarchy of Allorecognition Responses. , 1993, The Biological bulletin.

[13]  L W Buss,et al.  Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Han de Vries,et al.  An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  M. J. Huss.  Dispersal of Cellular Slime Molds by two Soil Invertebrates , 1989 .

[16]  Somatic and germ cell parasitism in a colonial ascidian: possible role for a highly polymorphic allorecognition system. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Valero,et al.  Short allele dominance as a source of heterozygote deficiency at microsatellite loci: experimental evidence at the dinucleotide locus Gv1CT in Gracilaria gracilis (Rhodophyta) , 1998 .

[18]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Co‐occurrence in nature of different clones of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[19]  I. Ross.  STUDIES ON DIPLOID STRAINS OF DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM , 1960 .

[20]  K. Foster,et al.  The costs and benefits of being a chimera , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Y. Sawada,et al.  Cell type proportioning in Dictyostelium slugs: lack of regulation within a 2.5-fold tolerance range. , 2001, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[22]  Marcus Frean,et al.  Rock–scissors–paper and the survival of the weakest , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Francis,et al.  Genetic structure of a natural population of Dictyostelium discoideum, a cellular slime mould , 1993, Molecular ecology.

[24]  S. Johansen,et al.  Rapid disappearance of one parental mitochondrial genotype after isogamous mating in the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum , 2004, Current Genetics.

[25]  H. B. Suthers.  Ground-feeding migratory songbirds as cellular slime mold distribution vectors , 1985, Oecologia.

[26]  G. Holton.  Sociobiology: the new synthesis? , 1977, Newsletter on science, technology & human values.

[27]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[28]  M. Feldman,et al.  Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors , 2002, Nature.

[29]  D. Waddell.  A predatory slime mould , 1982, Nature.

[30]  M. Sussman,et al.  Cellular Slime Molds , 1974 .

[31]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies , 1996, Nature.