Using a Hidden Markov Model for Improving the Spatial-Temporal Consistency of Time Series Land Cover Classification

Time series land cover maps play a key role in monitoring the dynamic change of land use. To obtain classification maps with better spatial-temporal consistency and classification accuracy, this study used an algorithm that incorporated information from spatial and temporal neighboring observations in a hidden Markov model (HMM) to improve the time series land cover maps initially produced by a support vector machine (SVM). To investigate the effects of different initial distributions and transition probability matrices on the classification of the HMM, we designed different experimental schemes with different input elements to verify this algorithm with Landsat and HJ satellite images. In addition, we introduced spatial weights into the HMM to make effective use of spatial information. The experimental results showed that the HMM considered that spatial weights could eliminate the vast majority of illogical land cover transition that may occur in previous pixel-wise classification, and that this model had obvious advantages in spatial-temporal consistency and classification accuracy over some existing classification models.

[1]  P. V. Oort Improving land cover change estimates by accounting for classification errors , 2005 .

[2]  Zhenhua Guo,et al.  A Completed Modeling of Local Binary Pattern Operator for Texture Classification , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Damien Sulla-Menashe,et al.  Enhancing MODIS land cover product with a spatial–temporal modeling algorithm , 2014 .

[4]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Measuring the VC-Dimension of a Learning Machine , 1994, Neural Computation.

[5]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Rotation Invariant Image Description with Local Binary Pattern Histogram Fourier Features , 2009, SCIA.

[6]  A. Dewan,et al.  Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: Using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization , 2009 .

[7]  Chandra Giri,et al.  A comparative analysis of the Global Land Cover 2000 and MODIS land cover data sets , 2005 .

[8]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  An image change detection algorithm based on Markov random field models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Le Yu,et al.  Mapping global land cover in 2001 and 2010 with spatial-temporal consistency at 250 m resolution , 2015 .

[10]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation: Time-Series Analysis of Multi-Resolution Optical Imagery for Quantifying Forest Cover Loss in Sumatra and Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2011 .

[11]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: A review , 2016 .

[12]  L. Aurdal,et al.  Use of hidden Markov models and phenology for multitemporal satellite image classification: applications to mountain vegetation classification , 2005, International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005..

[13]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  Lin Yan,et al.  Improved time series land cover classification by missing-observation-adaptive nonlinear dimensionality reduction , 2015 .

[15]  Zhengwei Yang,et al.  Monitoring US agriculture: the US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer Program , 2011 .

[16]  Guang Yang,et al.  Improving Seasonal Land Cover Maps of Poyang Lake Area in China by Taking into Account Logical Transitions , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[17]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Improving the Consistency of Multitemporal Land Cover Maps Using a Hidden Markov Model , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  D. Roy,et al.  A method for integrating MODIS and Landsat data for systematic monitoring of forest cover and change in the Congo Basin , 2008 .

[19]  Xavier Pons,et al.  Land-cover and land-use change in a Mediterranean landscape: A spatial analysis of driving forces integrating biophysical and human factors , 2008 .

[20]  Martin Jung,et al.  Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling , 2006 .

[21]  Sebastiano B. Serpico,et al.  A Markov random field approach to spatio-temporal contextual image classification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[22]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[23]  Desheng Liu,et al.  A spatial–temporal contextual Markovian kernel method for multi-temporal land cover mapping , 2015 .

[24]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Historical forest biomass dynamics modelled with Landsat spectral trajectories , 2014 .

[25]  Conghe Song,et al.  Consistent classification of image time series with automatic adaptive signature generalization , 2013 .

[26]  Arnt-Børre Salberg,et al.  Temporal analysis of forest cover using hidden Markov models , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[27]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[28]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Mapping Priorities to Focus Cropland Mapping Activities: Fitness Assessment of Existing Global, Regional and National Cropland Maps , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[29]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  A spatial–temporal approach to monitoring forest disease spread using multi-temporal high spatial resolution imagery , 2006 .

[30]  M. Tulbure,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamic of surface water bodies using Landsat time-series data from 1999 to 2011 , 2013 .