Unraveling the three-dimensional morphology of Archean microbialites

Abstract Fenestrate microbialites from the 2521±3 Ma Gamohaan Formation, South Africa, are composed of calcite with traces of kerogen that represent the remains of ancient microbial mats. To delineate the 3-D geometry of these microbialites, specimens were serial-sectioned; sequential slices were polished in 120 μm increments and scanned to yield an image stack, which was rendered into a virtual model of the microbialites. The resulting virtual representation allowed for visualization and characterization of microbial growth geometries that were not visible from 2-D surfaces. Several new insights into the structure of microbialites emerged from characterizing their 3-D structure including the recognition of two new features, linear structures and tubular structures. The long, thin nature of these structures makes them difficult to identify in two dimensions. However, in three dimensions, they can be traced as thin ropes of fossilized microbial communities emerging from more typical microbial mat structures. Overall, these results demonstrate a new set of microbial features in the Gamohaan Formation that were only characterized by reconstructing the full geometry of the microbialites in three dimensions.

[1]  A. Moussine-Pouchkine,et al.  Evolution and environmental conditions of Conophyton—jacutophyton associations in the atar dolomite (upper proterozoic, Mauritania) , 1985 .

[2]  H. J. Hofmann,et al.  Origin of 3.45 Ga coniform stromatolites in Warrawoona Group, Western Australia , 1999 .

[3]  Dawn Y. Sumner,et al.  Late Archean calcite-microbe interactions; two morphologically distinct microbial communities that affected calcite nucleation differently , 1997 .

[4]  A. Knoll,et al.  The genesis and time distribution of two distinctive Proterozoic stromatolite microstructures , 1998 .

[5]  J. Woo,et al.  Dendroid morphology and growth patterns: 3-D computed tomographic reconstruction , 2011 .

[6]  R. Ketcham,et al.  Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous , 2005, Nature.

[7]  N. McLoughlin,et al.  Growth of synthetic stromatolites and wrinkle structures in the absence of microbes – implications for the early fossil record , 2008, Geobiology.

[8]  A. Knoll,et al.  Calcified metazoans in thrombolite-stromatolite reefs of the terminal Proterozoic Nama Group, Namibia , 2000, Paleobiology.

[9]  D. Sumner Microbial influences on local carbon isotopic ratios and their preservation in carbonate. , 2001, Astrobiology.

[10]  J. Schopf Stromatolites (Developments in Sedimentology, 20): M.R. Walter (Editor). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1796, 790 pp., U.S. $99.95 or Dfl. 259.00 , 1978 .

[11]  John P. Grotzinger,et al.  An abiotic model for stromatolite morphogenesis , 1996, Nature.

[12]  D. Sumner Carbonate precipitation and oxygen stratification in late Archean seawater as deduced from facies and stratigraphy of the Gamohaan and Frisco formations, Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa , 1997 .

[13]  D. Lowe Abiological origin of described stromatolites older than 3.2 Ga. , 1994, Geology.

[14]  D. Erwin,et al.  Possible animal-body fossils in pre-Marinoan limestones from South Australia , 2010 .

[15]  W. Preiss Chapter 2.1 Basic Field and Laboratory Methods for the Study of Stromatolites , 1976 .

[16]  Bernd Hamann,et al.  A geoscience perspective on immersive 3D gridded data visualization , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  Linda C. Kah,et al.  Reinterpreting a Proterozoic enigma: Conophyton-Jacutophyton stromatolites of the Mesoproterozoic Atar Group, Mauritania , 2012 .

[18]  A. Knoll,et al.  Stromatolites in Precambrian carbonates: evolutionary mileposts or environmental dipsticks? , 1999, Annual review of earth and planetary sciences.

[19]  R. Burne,et al.  Microbialites; organosedimentary deposits of benthic microbial communities , 1987 .

[20]  D. Sumner,et al.  UPb geochronologic constraints on deposition of the Campbellrand Subgroup, Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa , 1996 .

[21]  Cara L. Harwood,et al.  Understanding microbialite morphology using a comprehensive suite of three-dimensional analysis tools. , 2011, Astrobiology.

[22]  J. Grotzinger,et al.  Herringbone Calcite: Petrography and Environmental Significance , 1996 .

[23]  G. Eberli,et al.  Perspectives in carbonate geology : a tribute to the career of Robert Nathan Ginsburg , 2009 .

[24]  D. Higgs Quantitative areal geology of the United States , 1949 .

[25]  Stanley M. Awramik,et al.  Stromatolite morphogenesis—progress and problems , 1979 .

[26]  S. Watt,et al.  Mathematical and Image Analysis of Stromatolite Morphogenesis , 2003 .

[27]  Oliver Kreylos,et al.  Environment-Independent VR Development , 2008, ISVC.

[28]  Abigail C. Allwood,et al.  Stromatolite reef from the Early Archaean era of Australia , 2006, Nature.

[29]  Cara L. Harwood,et al.  Origins of Microbial Microstructures in the Neoproterozoic Beck Spring Dolomite: Variations in Microbial Community and Timing of Lithification , 2012 .

[30]  J. Grotzinger,et al.  Digital reconstruction of calcified early metazoans, terminal Proterozoic Nama Group, Namibia , 2001, Paleobiology.

[31]  D. Sumner,et al.  Late Archean molecular fossils from the Transvaal Supergroup record the antiquity of microbial diversity and aerobiosis , 2009 .

[32]  M. Walter,et al.  Precambrian Columnar Stromatolites in Australia: Morphological and Stratigraphic Analysis , 1969, Science.

[33]  C. D. Gebelein Biologic Control of Stromatolite Microstructure: Implications for Precambrian Time-Stratigraphy: ABSTRACT , 1972 .