Rechargeable lithium-ion cell state of charge and defect detection by in-situ inside-out magnetic resonance imaging

When and why does a rechargeable battery lose capacity or go bad? This is a question that is surprisingly difficult to answer; yet, it lies at the heart of progress in the fields of consumer electronics, electric vehicles, and electrical storage. The difficulty is related to the limited amount of information one can obtain from a cell without taking it apart and analyzing it destructively. Here, we demonstrate that the measurement of tiny induced magnetic field changes within a cell can be used to assess the level of lithium incorporation into the electrode materials, and diagnose certain cell flaws that could arise from assembly. The measurements are fast, can be performed on finished and unfinished cells, and most importantly, can be done nondestructively with cells that are compatible with commercial design requirements with conductive enclosures.The development of noninvasive methodology plays an important role in advancing lithium ion battery technology. Here the authors utilize the measurement of tiny magnetic field changes within a cell to assess the lithiation state of the active material, and detect defects.

[1]  R. Cava,et al.  Magnetism and structure of LixCoO2 and comparison to NaxCoO2 , 2007, 0710.3767.

[2]  B. Balcom,et al.  Visualization of Steady-State Ionic Concentration Profiles Formed in Electrolytes during Li-Ion Battery Operation and Determination of Mass-Transport Properties by in Situ Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Isobel J. Davidson,et al.  Long Range and Short Range Magnetic Order in Orthorhombic LiMnO2 , 1997 .

[4]  Jim P. Zheng,et al.  Non-Destructive Monitoring of Charge-Discharge Cycles on Lithium Ion Batteries using 7Li Stray-Field Imaging , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[5]  D. Steingart,et al.  Real-time materials evolution visualized within intact cycling alkaline batteries , 2014 .

[6]  M. Britton Magnetic resonance imaging of electrochemical cells containing bulk metal. , 2014, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[7]  Daniel A. Steingart,et al.  Electrochemical-acoustic time of flight: in operando correlation of physical dynamics with battery charge and health , 2015 .

[8]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Foundations of MRI phase imaging and processing for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM). , 2016, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[9]  Christoph Rau,et al.  Three-dimensional characterization of electrodeposited lithium microstructures using synchrotron X-ray phase contrast imaging. , 2015, Chemical communications.

[10]  C. Grey,et al.  Real-time 3D imaging of microstructure growth in battery cells using indirect MRI , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Forsyth,et al.  In Situ, Real-Time Visualization of Electrochemistry Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[12]  Fredrik Hallberg,et al.  Quantifying mass transport during polarization in a Li ion battery electrolyte by in situ 7Li NMR imaging. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Application of a Fourier‐based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility , 2005 .

[14]  Jie Xiao,et al.  Layered LixNiyMnyCo1-2yO2 Cathodes for Lithium Ion Batteries: Understanding Local Structure via Magnetic Properties , 2007 .

[15]  Alexej Jerschow,et al.  7Li MRI of Li batteries reveals location of microstructural lithium. , 2012, Nature materials.

[16]  R. Haddon,et al.  Large anisotropy and stage dependence of the magnetic susceptibility of alkali-graphite intercalation compounds , 1979 .

[17]  G. Goward,et al.  Accurate Characterization of Ion Transport Properties in Binary Symmetric Electrolytes Using In Situ NMR Imaging and Inverse Modeling. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[18]  M. Eikerling,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility as a direct measure of oxidation state in LiFePO4 batteries and cyclic water gas shift reactors. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[19]  Richard Bowtell,et al.  Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: A comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  Mingxue Tang,et al.  Following lithiation fronts in paramagnetic electrodes with in situ magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging , 2016, Nature Communications.

[21]  C. Moonen,et al.  A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility , 2003 .

[22]  Jurek A Nordmeyer-Massner,et al.  NMR probes for measuring magnetic fields and field dynamics in MR systems , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  A method for unwrapping highly wrapped multi‐echo phase images at very high field: UMPIRE , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Alexej Jerschow,et al.  Correlating Microstructural Lithium Metal Growth with Electrolyte Salt Depletion in Lithium Batteries Using ⁷Li MRI. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.