Connecting KOSs and the LOD Cloud

This paper describes a specific project, the current situation leading to it, its project design and first results. In particular, we will examine the terminology employed in the Linked Open Data cloud and compare this to the terminology employed in both the Universal Decimal Classification and the Basic Concepts Classification. We will explore whether these classifications can encourage greater consistency in LOD terminology. We thus hope to link the largely distinct scholarly literatures that address LOD and KOSs.

[1]  Gunter Saake,et al.  Basic Concepts, Classification, and Quality Criteria , 2013 .

[2]  Stefan Schlobach,et al.  LOD Laundromat: A Uniform Way of Publishing Other People's Dirty Data , 2014, SEMWEB.

[3]  Rick Szostak,et al.  CONVERTING UDC TO BCC: COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO INTERDISCIPLINARITY , 2017 .

[4]  María Poveda-Villalón,et al.  Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV): A gateway to reusable semantic vocabularies on the Web , 2016, Semantic Web.

[5]  Eero Hyvönen,et al.  Publishing and Using Cultural Heritage Linked Data on the Semantic Web , 2012, Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web.

[6]  Cheng Gao,et al.  Evolution of Wikipedia's Category Structure , 2012, ArXiv.

[7]  Joseph T. Tennis.  Subject Ontogeny: Subject Access Through Time and the Dimensionality of Classification , 2002 .

[8]  KoehlerWallace.  Web page change and persistence---a four-year longitudinal study , 2002 .

[9]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Web page change and persistence - A four-year longitudinal study , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Joseph T. Tennis.  Scheme Versioning in the Semantic Web , 2007 .

[11]  S. Freytag.  Image And Logic A Material Culture Of Microphysics , 2016 .

[12]  Joseph T. Tennis.  The strange case of eugenics: A subject's ontogeny in a long-lived classification scheme and the question of collocative integrity , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Heiko Paulheim,et al.  Adoption of the Linked Data Best Practices in Different Topical Domains , 2014, SEMWEB.

[14]  Richard P. Smiraglia,et al.  UDC in Action , 2013, ArXiv.

[15]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language , 2003, J. Web Semant..

[16]  Joseph T. Tennis.  Methodological Challenges in Scheme Versioning and Subject Ontogeny Research , 2016 .

[17]  Richard P. Smiraglia,et al.  Classifications and concepts: towards an elementary theory of knowledge interaction , 2013, J. Documentation.

[18]  H. Van de Sompel,et al.  Scholarly Context Not Found: One in Five Articles Suffers from Reference Rot , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  Melissa Gill,et al.  Encoding Multilingual Knowledge Systems in the Digital Age: The Getty Vocabularies , 2015 .

[20]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  A web observatory for the machine processability of structured data on the web , 2014, WebSci '14.