Segmentation techniques for the classification of brain tissue using magnetic resonance imaging

A technique is described for classifying brain tissue into three components: gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid. This technique uses simultaneously registered proton density and T2-weighted images. Samples of each of the three types of tissue are identified on both image sets and used as "training classes"; these tissue samples are then used to generate a linear discriminant function, which is used to classify the remaining pixels in the image data set. Effects of varying the location and number of training classes have been explored; six pairs of training classes have been found to yield a suitable classification. Interrater and test-retest reliability have been examined and found to be good. Intrascanner and interscanner reproducibility has also been evaluated; classification rates are reproducible within the same individual when the same scanner is used, but in this study poor reproducibility occurs when the same individual is scanned on two different scanners. The validity of the technique has been tested by examining correlations between traced and segmented regions of interest, evaluating correlations with age, and conducting phantom studies, in addition to using visual inspection of the classified images as an indication of face validity. From all four perspectives, the method has been found to have good validity. Additional applications, strengths, and limitations are discussed.

[1]  Terry L. Jernigan,et al.  Cerebral structure on MRI, part II: Specific changes in Alzheimer's and Huntington's diseases , 1991, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  Gwenn S. Smith,et al.  Alzheimer disease: measuring loss of cerebral gray matter with MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[3]  R. D. Bock,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research , 1978 .

[4]  C. N. de Graaf,et al.  Derivation of quantitative information in NMR imaging: a phantom study , 1984 .

[5]  Terry L. Jernigan,et al.  Cerebral structure on MRI, Part I: Localization of age-related changes , 1991, Biological Psychiatry.

[6]  D. S. Hickey,et al.  Accuracy of area measurements made from MR images compared with computed tomography. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  D L Braff,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in lenticular nuclei and cerebral cortex in schizophrenia. , 1991, Archives of general psychiatry.

[8]  J. Finn A General Model for Multivariate Analysis , 1978 .

[9]  B Maraviglia,et al.  Biological tissue simulation and standard testing material for MRI , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Effect of intersection spacing on MR image contrast and study time. , 1986, Radiology.

[11]  A. Alavi,et al.  Analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes with MR imaging. Part I. Methods, reliability, and validation. , 1991, Radiology.

[12]  D. Kennedy,et al.  Anatomic segmentation and volumetric calculations in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[13]  N W Lutz,et al.  Phantom material for quantitative evaluation of MR images. , 1986, Medical progress through technology.

[14]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Mathematical Tools for Applied Multivariate Analysis , 1976 .

[15]  K O Lim,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging: approaches for investigating schizophrenia. , 1990, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[16]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Image processing for the study of brain structure and function: problems and programs. , 1992, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[17]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[18]  C R Jack Brain and cerebrospinal fluid volume: measurement with MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[19]  T. Jernigan,et al.  Semiautomated methods for quantitating CSF volume on cranial computed tomography. , 1979, Radiology.

[20]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  A silicone gel phantom suitable for multimodality imaging. , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[21]  D M Hadley,et al.  Human cranial CSF volumes measured by MRI: sex and age influences. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  M Chui,et al.  Test method for MR image slice profile. , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  J E Gray,et al.  Section thickness and contiguity phantom for MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[24]  M Ashtari,et al.  Computerized volume measurement of brain structure. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[25]  Calyampudi R. Rao,et al.  Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. , 1953 .