Computing research in the academy: insights from theses and dissertations

Computational technologies have become increasingly pervasive in recent decades. Computing research in academia has commensurately seen dramatic increases, both in computing-specific research and research using computing. This article maps out the academic computing landscape by examining the connections between computing-related keywords used to describe theses and dissertations. Specifically, data from 29,435 dissertations and theses found in the ProQuest Theses and Dissertation database in the years 2009–2014 were analyzed. Results identify interdisciplinary clusters, as well as identify key differences in connections between the four computing disciplines in the database: computer science (CS), computer engineering (CE), information technology (IT), and information science (ISci). For example, authors who primarily identify with CS rarely list secondary keywords, while authors from a high variety of other disciplines list CS as a secondary keyword. CE is tightly focused and growing, but rarely seen as a relevant secondary keyword by other fields. Meanwhile, the highly interdisciplinary nature of IT and ISci is shown, along with different subgroups within those areas. While the total number of unique theses with computing-related keywords has remained steady, they have shifted dramatically between specific computing fields (e.g., away from CS toward CE and IT). Visualizations present information on the growth and change in focus of computing-related theses and dissertations, as well as networks of keywords that co-occur. We discuss potential explanations of the patterns, as well as their implications on the future of graduate work in computing disciplines.

[1]  Qingqiang Wu,et al.  Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting , 2011, Scientometrics.

[2]  Albert D. Ritzhaupt,et al.  An investigation of distance education in North American research literature using co-word analysis , 2010 .

[3]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  An analysis of research in computing disciplines , 2004, CACM.

[4]  Neal S. Coulter,et al.  Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Co-Word Analysis , 1993 .

[6]  David Harel,et al.  A Fast Multi-scale Method for Drawing Large Graphs , 2000, Graph Drawing.

[7]  Weijun Wang,et al.  Research characteristics and status on social media in China: A bibliometric and co-word analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[8]  Louis Fein The role of the university in computers, data processing, and related fields , 1959, IRE-AIEE-ACM '59 (Western).

[9]  Jiming Hu,et al.  Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  Qian-Jin Zong,et al.  Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[11]  Faith-Michael E. Uzoka,et al.  Red Fish Blue Fish: Reexamining Student Understanding of the Computing Disciplines , 2016, SIGITE.

[12]  S. N. Singh,et al.  Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010) , 2014, Scientometrics.

[13]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  A unified classification system for research in the computing disciplines , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[14]  Hui-Ling Wang,et al.  A co-word analysis of digital library field in China , 2012, Scientometrics.

[15]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[16]  Shalin Hai-Jew Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2012 .

[17]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[18]  Tian-Shyug Lee,et al.  Mapping the intellectual structure of the Internet of Things (IoT) field (2000–2014): a co-word analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[19]  Lei Cui,et al.  Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis , 2011, Scientometrics.

[20]  Sheue-Ling Hwang,et al.  Analysis of keyword-based tagging behaviors of experts and novices , 2011, Online Inf. Rev..

[21]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Pei-Chun Lee,et al.  Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis , 2010 .

[23]  Björn Hammarfelt,et al.  Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields , 2011, Scientometrics.

[24]  Lung-Sheng Lee,et al.  Trends and Issues in Technology Education Research in Taiwan: A Co-Word Analysis of 1994-2013 Graduate Theses. , 2015 .

[25]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  CHI 1994-2013: mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis , 2014, CHI.

[26]  Cathy Bishop-Clark,et al.  Do students differentiate between computing disciplines? , 2009, SIGCSE '09.

[27]  Sung Kim,et al.  Information Technology Research in the Academy: Insights from Theses and Dissertations , 2015, RIIT '15.

[28]  Ken Wakita,et al.  Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract] , 2007, WWW '07.

[29]  Bangrae Lee,et al.  Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[30]  Sotaro Shibayama,et al.  Use of dissertation data in science policy research , 2016, Scientometrics.

[31]  Yong Liu,et al.  A co-word analysis of library and information science in China , 2013, Scientometrics.

[32]  Mehri Sedighi,et al.  Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of Informetrics) , 2016 .

[33]  Jane Cho,et al.  Intellectual structure of the institutional repository field: A co-word analysis , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Qin He,et al.  Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[35]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  First Steps to Netviz Nirvana: Evaluating Social Network Analysis with NodeXL , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[36]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  The Google effect in doctoral theses , 2012, Scientometrics.

[38]  Munan Li,et al.  Explore the research front of a specific research theme based on a novel technique of enhanced co-word analysis , 2017, J. Inf. Sci..

[39]  Rogério Mugnaini,et al.  A new model to identify the productivity of theses in terms of articles using co-word analysis , 2014, J. Sci. Res..

[40]  LiuYong,et al.  A co-word analysis of library and information science in China , 2013 .

[41]  Gaston Heimeriks,et al.  Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[42]  Hadi Sharif Moghaddam,et al.  Intellectual structure of knowledge in iMetrics: A co-word analysis , 2017, Inf. Process. Manag..

[43]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[44]  Jean-Marie Cellier,et al.  Psychological approach to indexing: effects of the operator's expertise upon indexing behaviour , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..