Boundary Finding with Prior Shape and Smoothness Models

We propose a unified framework for boundary finding, where a Bayesian formulation, based on prior knowledge and the edge information of the input image (likelihood), is employed. The prior knowledge in our framework is based on principal component analysis of four different covariance matrices corresponding to independence, smoothness, statistical shape, and combined models, respectively. Indeed, snakes, modal analysis, Fourier descriptors, and point distribution models can be derived from or linked to our approaches of different prior models. When the true training set does not contain enough variability to express the full range of deformations, a mixed covariance matrix uses a combined prior of the smoothness and statistical variation modes. It adapts gradually to use more statistical modes of variation as larger data sets are available.

[1]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[2]  E. Dubois,et al.  Digital picture processing , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  J. Canny A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Closed-Form Solutions for Physically Based Shape Modeling and Recognition , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Closed-form solutions for physically-based shape modeling and recognition , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Boundary Finding with Parametrically Deformable Models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Building and using flexible models incorporating grey-level information , 1993, 1993 (4th) International Conference on Computer Vision.

[8]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A Probabilistic Fitness Measure for Deformable Template Models , 1994, BMVC.

[9]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Combining point distribution models with shape models based on finite element analysis , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[11]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Data Driven Refinement of Active Shape Model Search , 1996, BMVC.

[12]  H. Damasio,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence: Special Issue on Perceptual Organization in Computer Vision , 1998 .

[13]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  Elastic Model Based Non-rigid Registration Incorporation Statistical Shape Information , 1998, MICCAI.

[14]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  Boundary finding with correspondence using statistical shape models , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).

[15]  L. Staib,et al.  Statistical shape analysis for image segmentation and physical model-based nonrigid registration , 1999 .

[16]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  Shape-based 3D surface correspondence using geodesics and local geometry , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).