A Multi-Platform Flow Device for Microbial (Co-) Cultivation and Microscopic Analysis

Novel microbial cultivation platforms are of increasing interest to researchers in academia and industry. The development of materials with specialized chemical and geometric properties has opened up new possibilities in the study of previously unculturable microorganisms and has facilitated the design of elegant, high-throughput experimental set-ups. Within the context of the international Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition, we set out to design, manufacture, and implement a flow device that can accommodate multiple growth platforms, that is, a silicon nitride based microsieve and a porous aluminium oxide based microdish. It provides control over (co-)culturing conditions similar to a chemostat, while allowing organisms to be observed microscopically. The device was designed to be affordable, reusable, and above all, versatile. To test its functionality and general utility, we performed multiple experiments with Escherichia coli cells harboring synthetic gene circuits and were able to quantitatively study emerging expression dynamics in real-time via fluorescence microscopy. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the device provides a unique environment for the cultivation of nematodes, suggesting that the device could also prove useful in microscopy studies of multicellular microorganisms.

[1]  K. Zengler,et al.  Cultivating the uncultured , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Pascal Colpo,et al.  A printed nanolitre-scale bacterial sensor array. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Helene Andersson-Svahn,et al.  A microwell array device with integrated microfluidic components for enhanced single‐cell analysis , 2009, Electrophoresis.

[4]  Christina D Smolke,et al.  Building outside of the box: iGEM and the BioBricks Foundation , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  L. Tsimring,et al.  A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks , 2009, Nature.

[6]  Colin J Ingham,et al.  Where bio meets nano: the many uses for nanoporous aluminum oxide in biotechnology. , 2012, Biotechnology advances.

[7]  Santosh Pandey,et al.  A microfluidic platform for high-sensitivity, real-time drug screening on C. elegans and parasitic nematodes. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[8]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Entrainment of a Population of Synthetic Genetic Oscillators , 2011, Science.

[9]  Taesung Kim,et al.  Microfluidic Technologies for Synthetic Biology , 2011, International journal of molecular sciences.

[10]  S. Tsuneda,et al.  Hollow-Fiber Membrane Chamber as a Device for In Situ Environmental Cultivation , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  C. Ingham,et al.  Rapid drug susceptibility testing of mycobacteria by culture on a highly porous ceramic support. , 2008, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[12]  G. J. Veldhuis,et al.  Nanosieves with microsystem technology for microfiltration applications , 1998 .

[13]  Gijsbertus J.M. Krijnen,et al.  Ceramic microsieves: influence of perforation shape and distribution on flow resistance and membrane strength , 2002 .

[14]  David H. Gracias,et al.  Self-loading lithographically structured microcontainers: 3D patterned, mobile microwells. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[15]  Colin J Ingham,et al.  The micro-Petri dish, a million-well growth chip for the culture and high-throughput screening of microorganisms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Albert van den Berg,et al.  High-resolution microcontact printing and transfer of massive arrays of microorganisms on planar and compartmentalized nanoporous aluminium oxide. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[17]  Kwanghun Chung,et al.  Microfluidic chamber arrays for whole-organism behavior-based chemical screening. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Michael Curt Elwenspoek,et al.  Development and applications of very high flux microfiltration membranes , 1998 .

[19]  François Taddei,et al.  Microcontact printing of living bacteria arrays with cellular resolution. , 2007, Nano letters.

[20]  Chih-kuan Tung,et al.  Acceleration of Emergence of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance in Connected Microenvironments , 2011, Science.

[21]  K. Lewis,et al.  Isolating "Uncultivable" Microorganisms in Pure Culture in a Simulated Natural Environment , 2002, Science.

[22]  Drew Endy,et al.  Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts , 2008, Journal of Biological Engineering.

[23]  Hang Lu,et al.  Long-term high-resolution imaging and culture of C. elegans in chip-gel hybrid microfluidic device for developmental studies. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[24]  William R. Harcombe,et al.  NOVEL COOPERATION EXPERIMENTALLY EVOLVED BETWEEN SPECIES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  The role of wetting on the water flux performance of microsieve membranes , 2005 .

[26]  R. V. D. Sman,et al.  Evaluation of microsieve membrane design , 2006 .

[27]  S. Quake,et al.  Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat , 2005, Science.

[28]  C. Ingham,et al.  Rapid antibiotic sensitivity testing and trimethoprim-mediated filamentation of clinical isolates of the Enterobacteriaceae assayed on a novel porous culture support. , 2006, Journal of medical microbiology.