Combination of rituximab, bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone and chlorambucil (RiPAD+C) as first-line therapy for elderly mantle cell lymphoma patients: results of a phase II trial from the GOELAMS.

BACKGROUND There is no consensual first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The GOELAMS (Groupe Ouest-Est des Leucémies Aiguës et Maladies du Sang) group previously developed the (R)VAD+C regimen (rituximab, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone and chlorambucil), which appeared as efficient as R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicine, vincristine, prednisone) while less toxic. Based on this protocol, we now added bortezomib (RiPAD+C: rituximab, bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone and chlorambucil) given its efficacy in relapsed/refractory MCL patients. The goal of the current phase II trial was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the RiPAD+C regimen as frontline therapy for elderly patients with MCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients between 65 and 80 years of age with newly diagnosed MCL received up to six cycles of RiPAD+C. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Median age was 72 years (65-80). After four cycles of RiPAD+C, the overall response rate was 79%, including 51% complete responses (CRs). After six cycles, CR rate increased up to 59%. After a 27-month follow-up, median progression-free survival (PFS) is 26 months and median overall survival has not been reached. Four patients (10%) discontinued the treatment because of a severe toxicity and seven patients (18%) experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION The bortezomib-containing RiPAD+C regimen results in high CR rates and prolonged PFS with predictable and manageable toxic effects in elderly patients with MCL.

[1]  Peter Martin,et al.  Bortezomib plus CHOP-rituximab for previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  P. Moreau,et al.  A Phase 3 Prospective Randomized International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib In Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma , 2010 .

[3]  J. Rossi,et al.  Evaluation of the (R)VAD+C regimen for the treatment of newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. Combined results of two prospective phase II trials from the French GOELAMS group , 2010, Haematologica.

[4]  M. Mohty,et al.  Prognostic impact of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in untreated mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective study from the GOELAMS group , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  E. Kimby,et al.  The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) is superior to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) in predicting survival following intensive first-line immunochemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). , 2010, Blood.

[6]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Mantle cell lymphoma: state-of-the-art management and future perspective , 2009, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[7]  G. Salles,et al.  Efficacy and toxicity of 2 schedules of frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus bortezomib in patients with B‐cell lymphoma , 2009, Cancer.

[8]  Jeroen van der Laak,et al.  Ki-67 as a prognostic marker in mantle cell lymphoma—consensus guidelines of the pathology panel of the European MCL Network , 2009, Journal of hematopathology.

[9]  B. Sander,et al.  The subcellular Sox11 distribution pattern identifies subsets of mantle cell lymphoma: correlation to overall survival , 2008, British journal of haematology.

[10]  Martin Dreyling,et al.  A new prognostic index (MIPI) for patients with advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma. , 2006, Blood.

[11]  J. Leonard,et al.  Multicenter phase II study of bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Michael L. Wang,et al.  High rate of durable remissions after treatment of newly diagnosed aggressive mantle-cell lymphoma with rituximab plus hyper-CVAD alternating with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  E. Hoster,et al.  Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone significantly improves response and time to treatment failure, but not long-term outcome in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial of the Germa , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Gribben,et al.  Rituximab and CHOP induction therapy for newly diagnosed mantle-cell lymphoma: molecular complete responses are not predictive of progression-free survival. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  J. Armitage,et al.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Hyper-CVAD and high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine followed by stem-cell transplantation: an active regimen for aggressive mantle-cell lymphoma. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  J. Leonard,et al.  Bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: updated time-to-event analyses of the multicenter phase 2 PINNACLE study. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  A. Delmer,et al.  Sequential chemotherapy regimens followed by high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma: an update of a prospective study. , 2004, Haematologica.