First-line single-agent cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab is active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) both in monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy (CT). This study assesses the antitumor activity of single-agent cetuximab in CT-naive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Phase II clinical trial was used. Patients were EGFR positive by immunohistochemistry and were not candidate for radical surgery, even in the case of substantial tumor shrinkage. Cetuximab was administered weekly. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients were treated and evaluated. The most common adverse event was skin toxicity (89% any grade; 48% grade 1; 31% grade 2; 10% grade 3). One patient had a complete response and three obtained partial responses (10% overall response rate). Thirteen patients had stable disease (34%). Twenty-two patients experienced progressive disease (56%). Overall median time to progression (TTP) was 2 months, and the responders individual TTP was 12, 9, 9, and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS Even in chemo-naive patients, cetuximab as single agent is active only in a small fraction of mCRC, similarly to what has been reported for heavily pretreated patients. The extent of benefit when response occurs is, however, such that it is mandatory to intensify the search for the predictive markers of response to cetuximab therapy.

[1]  M. Moroni,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and clinical outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Richard J Stephens,et al.  Different strategies of sequential and combination chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS): a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[3]  C. Punt,et al.  Sequential compared to combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC): A Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) phase III study , 2007 .

[4]  C. Köhne,et al.  Randomized phase III study of irinotecan and 5-FU/FA with or without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The CRYSTAL trial , 2007 .

[5]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Cetuximab plus 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) versus FOLFOX-4 in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): OPUS, a randomized phase II study , 2007 .

[6]  Silvia Benvenuti,et al.  Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. , 2007, Cancer research.

[7]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Multicenter phase II and translational study of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal carcinoma refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  H. Modjtahedi,et al.  Responses of human colorectal tumor cells to treatment with the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody ICR62 used alone and in combination with the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. , 2006, Cancer research.

[9]  H. Lenz,et al.  Two immunoglobulin G fragment C receptor polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome of EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with single agent cetuximab. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  S. Barni,et al.  Alternating versus continuous "FOLFIRI" in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC): A randomized "GISCAD" trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  L. Mineur,et al.  OPTIMOX2, a large randomized phase II study of maintenance therapy or chemotherapy-free intervals (CFI) after FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC). A GERCOR study. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[13]  R. Goldberg,et al.  A meta-analysis of two randomised trials of early chemotherapy in asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  R. Goldberg,et al.  Systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: current options, current evidence. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  S. Groshen,et al.  Molecular determinants of cetuximab efficacy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Silvia Benvenuti,et al.  Gene copy number for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and clinical response to antiEGFR treatment in colorectal cancer: a cohort study. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  N. Matsubara,et al.  Colorectal cancer with mutation in BRAF, KRAS, and wild-type with respect to both oncogenes showing different patterns of DNA methylation. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  J. Baselga,et al.  Dose-dependent inhibition of the EGFR and signalling pathways with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (MAb) EMD 72000 administered every three weeks (q3w). A phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study to define the optimal biological dose (OBD). , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Neal J Meropol,et al.  Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  D. Sargent,et al.  Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  C. Tournigand,et al.  FOLFIRI Followed by FOLFOX6 or the Reverse Sequence in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized GERCOR Study , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  D. Kerr,et al.  Comparison of intermittent and continuous palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[24]  J. Figueras,et al.  Resection rate and effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival after surgery for colorectal liver metastases , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  P. Rougier,et al.  Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a French intergroup study. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Expectancy or primary chemotherapy in patients with advanced asymptomatic colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  N. Petrelli,et al.  The modulation of fluorouracil with leucovorin in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a prospective randomized phase III trial. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.