Novel 3D Bioglass Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration

The design of scaffolds with optimal biomechanical properties for load-bearing applications is an important topic of research. Most studies have addressed this problem by focusing on the material composition and not on the coupled effect between the material composition and the scaffold architecture. Polymer–bioglass scaffolds have been investigated due to the excellent bioactivity properties of bioglass, which release ions that activate osteogenesis. However, material preparation methods usually require the use of organic solvents that induce surface modifications on the bioglass particles, compromising the adhesion with the polymeric material thus compromising mechanical properties. In this paper, we used a simple melt blending approach to produce polycaprolactone/bioglass pellets to construct scaffolds with pore size gradient. The results show that the addition of bioglass particles improved the mechanical properties of the scaffolds and, due to the selected architecture, all scaffolds presented mechanical properties in the cortical bone region. Moreover, the addition of bioglass indicated a positive long-term effect on the biological performance of the scaffolds. The pore size gradient also induced a cell spreading gradient.

[1]  Changchun Zhou,et al.  3D printing of PLA/n-HA composite scaffolds with customized mechanical properties and biological functions for bone tissue engineering , 2021 .

[2]  Juan F. Vivanco,et al.  Shape fidelity, mechanical and biological performance of 3D printed polycaprolactone-bioactive glass composite scaffolds. , 2021, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[3]  H. Cajner,et al.  Personalised urethra pessaries prepared by material extrusion-based additive manufacturing. , 2021, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[4]  N. A. Kadri,et al.  Advances in bioactive glass-containing injectable hydrogel biomaterials for tissue regeneration. , 2021, Acta biomaterialia.

[5]  Jia‐Min Wu,et al.  Microstructures and properties of 45S5 bioglass® & BCP bioceramic scaffolds fabricated by digital light processing , 2021 .

[6]  T. Hofmann,et al.  Impact of Phytochemicals on Viability and Cereulide Toxin Synthesis in Bacillus cereus Revealed by a Novel High-Throughput Method, Coupling an AlamarBlue-Based Assay with UPLC-MS/MS , 2021, Toxins.

[7]  J. I. Vilches-Pérez,et al.  Effect of Washing Treatment on the Textural Properties and Bioactivity of Silica/Chitosan/TCP Xerogels for Bone Regeneration , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[8]  W. Cui,et al.  Immunopolarization-regulated 3D printed-electrospun fibrous scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2021, Biomaterials.

[9]  R. He,et al.  Effects of pore size on the mechanical and biological properties of stereolithographic 3D printed HAp bioceramic scaffold , 2021 .

[10]  Johnson V. John,et al.  Biomaterials with structural hierarchy and controlled 3D nanotopography guide endogenous bone regeneration , 2021, Science Advances.

[11]  Wei Bi,et al.  Highly bioactive peptide-HA photo-crosslinking hydrogel for sustained promoting bone regeneration , 2021, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[12]  S. Panseri,et al.  Medicated Hydroxyapatite/Collagen Hybrid Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration and Local Antimicrobial Therapy to Prevent Bone Infections , 2021, Pharmaceutics.

[13]  A. Kemper,et al.  A comparison of rib cortical bone compressive and tensile material properties: Trends with age, sex, and loading rate. , 2021, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[14]  K. Fu,et al.  Polymer-based filament feedstock for additive manufacturing , 2021 .

[15]  F. Weber,et al.  The optimal microarchitecture of 3D-printed β-TCP bone substitutes for vertical bone augmentation differs from that for osteoconduction , 2021, Materials & Design.

[16]  E. Fiume,et al.  Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential? , 2021, Materials.

[17]  A. Basit,et al.  Advances in powder bed fusion 3D printing in drug delivery and healthcare. , 2021, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[18]  N. Baldini,et al.  Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration Based on PCL and Mg-Containing Bioactive Glasses , 2021, Biology.

[19]  M. Edén Structure and formation of amorphous calcium phosphate and its role as surface layer of nanocrystalline apatite: Implications for bone mineralization , 2021 .

[20]  L. Avérous,et al.  Fabrication and properties of alginate-hydroxyapatite biocomposites as efficient biomaterials for bone regeneration , 2021 .

[21]  Y. Zuo,et al.  Recent Advances in PLGA-based Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Regeneration. , 2021, Acta biomaterialia.

[22]  R. Reis,et al.  Scaffold Fabrication Technologies and Structure/Function Properties in Bone Tissue Engineering , 2021, Advanced Functional Materials.

[23]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Investigating the Influence of Architecture and Material Composition of 3D Printed Anatomical Design Scaffolds for Large Bone Defects , 2021, International journal of bioprinting.

[24]  V. Rutkunas,et al.  Effect of extracellular matrix and dental pulp stem cells on bone regeneration with 3D printed PLA/HA composite scaffolds. , 2021, European cells & materials.

[25]  C. Santili,et al.  Treatment of femur pseudoarthrosis using wave plate: Evaluation of consolidation and its relationship with graft type. , 2021, Injury.

[26]  X. Shan,et al.  High solid content 45S5 Bioglass®-based scaffolds using stereolithographic ceramic manufacturing: process, structural and mechanical properties , 2021 .

[27]  Miaoda Shen,et al.  Rational design of bioceramic scaffolds with tuning pore geometry by stereolithography: Microstructure evaluation and mechanical evolution , 2021 .

[28]  A. Jafari,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of the microplate alamar blue assay and the proportion method for the prompt detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates , 2021 .

[29]  E. Rodríguez‐Merchán A Review of Recent Developments in the Molecular Mechanisms of Bone Healing , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[30]  Yubao Li,et al.  Conducting Polyetheretherketone Nanocomposites with an Electrophoretically Deposited Bioactive Coating for Bone Tissue Regeneration and Multimodal Therapeutic Applications. , 2020, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[31]  Abdalla M. Omar,et al.  The Potential of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol as Biomaterial for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2020, Polymers.

[32]  Limei Li,et al.  Synergistic anti-inflammatory and osteogenic n-HA/resveratrol/chitosan composite microspheres for osteoporotic bone regeneration , 2020, Bioactive materials.

[33]  Seyed Ali Mosaddad,et al.  Fabrication and properties of developed collagen/strontium-doped Bioglass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2020 .

[34]  Xiaojun Yu,et al.  Fabrication of polylactic acid (PLA)-based porous scaffold through the combination of traditional bio-fabrication and 3D printing technology for bone regeneration. , 2020, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[35]  Pamela Robles Martinez,et al.  Vat photopolymerization 3D printing for advanced drug delivery and medical device applications. , 2020, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[36]  M. Behmanesh,et al.  Drug-eluting PCL/graphene oxide nanocomposite scaffolds for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. , 2020, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[37]  Yan Dai,et al.  Differentially expressed microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for infected tibial non-union. , 2020, Injury.

[38]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  Metal‐based nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering , 2020, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[39]  F. Wen,et al.  Investigation of bone reconstruction using an attenuated immunogenicity xenogenic composite scaffold fabricated by 3D printing , 2020, Bio-Design and Manufacturing.

[40]  Zhengyi Jiang,et al.  Engineered dual-scale poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds using 3D printing and rotational electrospinning for bone tissue regeneration , 2020 .

[41]  A. Completo,et al.  Electrospinning of bioactive polycaprolactone-gelatin nanofibres with increased pore size for cartilage tissue engineering applications , 2020, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[42]  L. Cardon,et al.  Screening of Pharmaceutical Polymers for Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing of Patient- Tailored Tablets. , 2020, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[43]  Gerry L. Koons,et al.  Materials design for bone-tissue engineering , 2020, Nature Reviews Materials.

[44]  C. Park,et al.  In-situ polymerized polypyrrole nanoparticles immobilized poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun conductive scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2020, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[45]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Tailoring polypropylene for extrusion-based additive manufacturing , 2020 .

[46]  M. Leu,et al.  3D-printed Biomimetic Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvarial Defects , 2020, International journal of bioprinting.

[47]  M. Del Fabbro,et al.  The Impact of Bioceramic Scaffolds on Bone Regeneration in Preclinical In Vivo Studies: A Systematic Review , 2020, Materials.

[48]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Aligned multi-walled carbon nanotubes with nanohydroxyapatite in a 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffold stimulates osteogenic differentiation. , 2020, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[49]  P. Dubruel,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Printed Gelatin-Based Scaffolds with Varying Pore Size for MSC-Based Adipose Tissue Engineering. , 2020, Macromolecular bioscience.

[50]  A. Fathi,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of polymethyl methacrylate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2020 .

[51]  Md Shahadat Hossain,et al.  Polymers for Extrusion-Based 3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals: A Holistic Materials–Process Perspective , 2020, Pharmaceutics.

[52]  Yongxiang Xu,et al.  Fabrication and Application of a 3D-Printed Poly-ε-Caprolactone Cage Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2020, BioMed research international.

[53]  Geunhyung Kim,et al.  3D-printed PCL/bioglass (BGS-7) composite scaffolds with high toughness and cell-responses for bone tissue regeneration , 2019, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.

[54]  Huawei Qu,et al.  Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering scaffolds: a review , 2019, RSC advances.

[55]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Engineered 3D printed poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/graphene scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2019, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[56]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Four-dimensional imaging and quantification of viscous flow sintering within a 3D printed bioactive glass scaffold using synchrotron X-ray tomography , 2019, Materials Today Advances.

[57]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Fabrication and characterisation of 3D printed MWCNT composite porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2019, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[58]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Hybrid polycaprolactone/hydrogel scaffold fabrication and in-process plasma treatment using PABS , 2018, International journal of bioprinting.

[59]  M. Salehi,et al.  Mechanical, material, and biological study of a PCL/bioactive glass bone scaffold: Importance of viscoelasticity. , 2018, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[60]  E. Morgan,et al.  Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States. , 2018, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[61]  E. Bernardo,et al.  Bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds by additive manufacturing and sinter-crystallization of fine glass powders , 2018, Journal of Materials Research.

[62]  M. Mozafari,et al.  Bioactive Glasses: Sprouting Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering. , 2018, Trends in biotechnology.

[63]  Carl Diver,et al.  Enhancing the Hydrophilicity and Cell Attachment of 3D Printed PCL/Graphene Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2016, Materials.

[64]  Patrina S P Poh,et al.  In vitro and in vivo bone formation potential of surface calcium phosphate-coated polycaprolactone and polycaprolactone/bioactive glass composite scaffolds. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[65]  Dong-Woo Cho,et al.  An additive manufacturing‐based PCL–alginate–chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering , 2015, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[66]  Andrew A. Amis,et al.  A comparative study of the effects of different bioactive fillers in PLGA matrix composites and their suitability as bone substitute materials: A thermo-mechanical and in vitro investigation. , 2015, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[67]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Collagen surface modified poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds with improved hydrophilicity and cell adhesion properties , 2014 .

[68]  Molly M. Stevens,et al.  Corrigendum: Fabrication and in vitro characterization of bioactive glass composite scaffolds for bone regeneration (2013 Biofabrication 5 045005) , 2014 .

[69]  S. Pilli,et al.  Insights into the effects of tensile and compressive loadings on human femur bone , 2014, Advanced biomedical research.

[70]  Molly M Stevens,et al.  Fabrication and in vitro characterization of bioactive glass composite scaffolds for bone regeneration , 2013, Biofabrication.

[71]  J. Sarasua,et al.  Improvement of thermal stability and mechanical properties of medical polyester composites by plasma surface modification of the bioactive glass particles , 2013 .

[72]  J. Sarasua,et al.  Effect of bioactive glass particles on the thermal degradation behaviour of medical polyesters , 2013 .

[73]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs , 2012 .

[74]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. , 2011, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[75]  J. Monllau,et al.  A porous PCL scaffold promotes the human chondrocytes redifferentiation and hyaline-specific extracellular matrix protein synthesis. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[76]  A. R. Boccaccini,et al.  The surface functionalization of 45S5 Bioglass®-based glass-ceramic scaffolds and its impact on bioactivity , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[77]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[78]  J. Polak,et al.  Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[79]  Falguni Pati,et al.  Synthesis and Optimization of PCL-Bioactive Glass Composite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2019, Materials Today: Proceedings.

[80]  J. Ciurana,et al.  Biomedical production of implants by additive electro-chemical and physical processes , 2012 .