Structural Aspect of Hydroxyethyl-Starch–Anticancer-Drug-Conjugates as State-of-the-Art Drug Carriers

Cancer is a genetic disorder and its treatment usually requires a long time and expensive diagnosis. While chemotherapy is the most conventional approach in treating most cancers, patients often suffer from undesired side effects due to various pharmacokinetic aspects. To address this issue, target-oriented drug-delivery systems (DDS) or pulsatile drug-delivery systems (PDDS) have recently been developed as an alternative tool that takes care of the entire pharmacodynamic activities of drug action. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) has emerged as an effective clinical tool for delivering anticancer agents into target cells. These systems have demonstrated significant potential as anticancer drug carrier conjugates through their innate pharmacokinetic properties with their safety profile. This review focuses primarily on the structural aspect during the use of HES or HES-based polymers as carriers for delivering well-known anticancer drugs. This review also indicates a perspective on the long-term research needed for the sake of improving modern drug-delivery systems based on HES polymers and in the form of nanocarriers.

[1]  S. Leporatti Thinking about Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect (EPR) , 2022, Journal of personalized medicine.

[2]  Zhenyu Lin,et al.  Colon-targeted oral nanoparticles based on ROS-scavenging hydroxyethyl starch-curcumin conjugates for efficient inflammatory bowel disease therapy. , 2022, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[3]  Yun Liu,et al.  Hydroxyethyl Starch Improves the Prognosis of Rats with Traumatic Shock via Activation of the ERK Signaling Pathway in Lymphocytes , 2022, Computational and mathematical methods in medicine.

[4]  Hang Hu,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch based smart nanomedicine , 2021, RSC advances.

[5]  Ying Wan,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch and its derivatives as nanocarriers for delivery of diagnostic and therapeutic agents towards cancers , 2020, Biomaterials translational.

[6]  M. Dolaz,et al.  Synthesis and Characterization of Hydroxyethyl Starch from Chips Wastes Under Microwave Irradiation , 2020, Journal of Polymers and the Environment.

[7]  A. Omar,et al.  Targeted delivery of 5-fluorouracil-1-acetic acid (5-FA) to cancer cells overexpressing epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) using virus-like nanoparticles , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Mateusz Kciuk,et al.  Mechanisms of Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Chemotherapy , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[9]  M. Orho-Melander,et al.  Lifestyle and cancer incidence and mortality risk depending on family history of cancer in two prospective cohorts , 2020, International journal of cancer.

[10]  Q. Tang,et al.  Nano-micelles based on hydroxyethyl starch-curcumin conjugates for improved stability, antioxidant and anticancer activity of curcumin. , 2020, Carbohydrate polymers.

[11]  Limei Zhao,et al.  Lysine-mediated hydroxyethyl starch-10-hydroxy camptothecin micelles for the treatment of liver cancer , 2020, Drug delivery.

[12]  M. Steinfath,et al.  Effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.42) on endothelial and epithelial permeability in vitro. , 2019, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[13]  Zhengping Liu,et al.  pH and thermo dual-responsive starch-g-P(DEAEMA-co-PEGMA): Synthesis via SET-LRP, self-assembly and drug release behaviors , 2019, Reactive and Functional Polymers.

[14]  M. Masuda,et al.  Priming and replenishment in cardiopulmonary bypass with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 decreases fluid overbalance without renal dysfunction or bleeding in adult valve surgery , 2019, General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[15]  Ying Wan,et al.  Hydroxyethyl Starch-Based Nanoparticles Featured with Redox-Sensitivity and Chemo-Photothermal Therapy for Synergized Tumor Eradication , 2019, Cancers.

[16]  C. Cervellati,et al.  Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 Binds to Neutrophils Impairing Their Chemotaxis through a Mac-1 Dependent Interaction , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[17]  Li Zhang,et al.  Self-assembly of cationic amphiphilic cellulose-g-poly (p-dioxanone) copolymers. , 2019, Carbohydrate polymers.

[18]  Huiyang Zhou,et al.  Colloidal hydroxyethyl starch for tumor-targeted platinum delivery , 2018, Nanoscale advances.

[19]  Huibi Xu,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch stabilized polydopamine nanoparticles for cancer chemotherapy , 2018, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[20]  Sabu Thomas,et al.  Biopolymer based nanomaterials in drug delivery systems: A review , 2018, Materials Today Chemistry.

[21]  Xiangliang Yang,et al.  Nanocolloidosomes with Selective Drug Release for Active Tumor-Targeted Imaging-Guided Photothermal/Chemo Combination Therapy. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[22]  D. Oupický,et al.  Chloroquine-Modified Hydroxyethyl Starch as a Polymeric Drug for Cancer Therapy. , 2017, Biomacromolecules.

[23]  H. Kolya,et al.  Novel Biodegradable Flocculating Agents Based on Grafted Starch Family for the Industrial Effluent Treatment , 2017, Journal of Polymers and the Environment.

[24]  Huibi Xu,et al.  α-Amylase- and Redox-Responsive Nanoparticles for Tumor-Targeted Drug Delivery. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[25]  Ying Wan,et al.  Enhancing Doxorubicin Delivery toward Tumor by Hydroxyethyl Starch-g-Polylactide Partner Nanocarriers. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[26]  Xuesi Chen,et al.  Targeted hydroxyethyl starch prodrug for inhibiting the growth and metastasis of prostate cancer. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[27]  F. Danhier,et al.  To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine? , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[28]  Huibi Xu,et al.  Redox-Sensitive Hydroxyethyl Starch-Doxorubicin Conjugate for Tumor Targeted Drug Delivery. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[29]  Shewaye Lakew Mekuria,et al.  Polysaccharide based nanogels in the drug delivery system: Application as the carrier of pharmaceutical agents. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[30]  Li Chen,et al.  Drug binding rate regulates the properties of polysaccharide prodrugs. , 2016, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[31]  Cuifang Cai,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch–10-hydroxy camptothecin conjugate: synthesis, pharmacokinetics, cytotoxicity and pharmacodynamics research , 2016, Drug delivery.

[32]  Katharina Landfester,et al.  Carbohydrate nanocarriers in biomedical applications: functionalization and construction. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[33]  Xuesi Chen,et al.  Reduction-responsive polypeptide nanogel delivers antitumor drug for improved efficacy and safety. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[34]  Ru-jing Ren,et al.  The endosomal-lysosomal system: from acidification and cargo sorting to neurodegeneration , 2015, Translational Neurodegeneration.

[35]  Z. Sideratou,et al.  Carboxylated Hydroxyethyl Starch: A novel Polysaccharide for the Delivery of Doxorubicin , 2015, Chemical biology & drug design.

[36]  Polly A Glover,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch: a review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, current products, and potential clinical risks, benefits, and use. , 2014, Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care.

[37]  Joseph W. Nichols,et al.  EPR: Evidence and fallacy. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[38]  Cuifang Cai,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch conjugates for improving the stability, pharmacokinetic behavior and antitumor activity of 10-hydroxy camptothecin. , 2014, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[39]  Vladimir P Torchilin,et al.  Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors , 2014, Tissue barriers.

[40]  J. Boratýnski,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch as an effective methotrexate carrier in anticancer therapy , 2014, Pharmacology research & perspectives.

[41]  Shaoyu Lü,et al.  Physicochemical characterization of amphiphilic nanoparticles based on the novel starch-deoxycholic acid conjugates and self-aggregates. , 2014, Carbohydrate polymers.

[42]  B. D. Anderson,et al.  The role of pH and ring-opening hydrolysis kinetics on liposomal release of topotecan. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[43]  Guohua Zhao,et al.  Synthesis, characterization, and aqueous self-assembly of octenylsuccinate Oat β-glucan. , 2013, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[44]  H. Kolya,et al.  Hydroxyethyl Starch-g-Poly-(N,N-dimethylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid): An efficient dye removing agent , 2013 .

[45]  Kinam Park Questions on the role of the EPR effect in tumor targeting. , 2013, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[46]  Huibi Xu,et al.  Novel nanomicelles originating from hydroxyethyl starch-g-polylactide and their release behavior of docetaxel modulated by the PLA chain length , 2013 .

[47]  G. Winter,et al.  The effect of molar mass and degree of hydroxyethylation on the controlled shielding and deshielding of hydroxyethyl starch-coated polyplexes. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[48]  Andreas Bertz,et al.  Encapsulation of proteins in hydrogel carrier systems for controlled drug delivery: influence of network structure and drug size on release rate. , 2013, Journal of biotechnology.

[49]  Kinam Park,et al.  Analysis on the current status of targeted drug delivery to tumors. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[50]  K. Landfester,et al.  Suppressing unspecific cell uptake for targeted delivery using hydroxyethyl starch nanocapsules. , 2012, Biomacromolecules.

[51]  Andreas Bertz,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch-based polymers for the controlled release of biomacromolecules from hydrogel microspheres. , 2012, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[52]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[53]  G. Winter,et al.  Controlled shielding and deshielding of gene delivery polyplexes using hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and alpha-amylase. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[54]  R. Sun,et al.  Self-assembly and paclitaxel loading capacity of cellulose-graft-poly(lactide) nanomicelles. , 2012, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[55]  D. Peer,et al.  Polysaccharides as building blocks for nanotherapeutics. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[56]  Xing Tang,et al.  A novel 5-fluorouracil prodrug using hydroxyethyl starch as a macromolecular carrier for sustained release , 2012 .

[57]  Shufen Zhang,et al.  Micelles self-assembled from thermoresponsive 2-hydroxy-3-butoxypropyl starches for drug delivery , 2012 .

[58]  Y. Shaked,et al.  Antiangiogenic antitumor activity of HPMA copolymer-paclitaxel-alendronate conjugate on breast cancer bone metastasis mouse model. , 2011, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[59]  P. Hammond,et al.  Controlling in vivo stability and biodistribution in electrostatically assembled nanoparticles for systemic delivery. , 2011, Nano letters.

[60]  David John Adams,et al.  Tumor physiology and charge dynamics of anticancer drugs: implications for camptothecin-based drug development. , 2011, Current medicinal chemistry.

[61]  K. Yadav,et al.  Modified Nanoprecipitation Method for Preparation of Cytarabine-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles , 2010, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[62]  U. Schubert,et al.  Poly(ethylene glycol) in drug delivery: pros and cons as well as potential alternatives. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[63]  R. Daniels,et al.  A new hydrogel drug delivery system based on Hydroxyethylstarch derivatives , 2010, Journal of microencapsulation.

[64]  J. Oh,et al.  Biopolymer-based microgels/nanogels for drug delivery applications , 2009 .

[65]  Hua Wei,et al.  Thermo-sensitive polymeric micelles based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) as drug carriers , 2009 .

[66]  S. Perrier,et al.  Cellulose modification by polymer grafting: a review. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[67]  R. Duncan,et al.  Dextrin-phospholipase A2: synthesis and evaluation as a bioresponsive anticancer conjugate. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.

[68]  Bai Yang,et al.  Self-assembly of photonic crystals from polymer colloids , 2009 .

[69]  T. Groth,et al.  Characterization of PLGA nanospheres stabilized with amphiphilic polymers: hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl starch vs pluronics. , 2009, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[70]  L. Tetley,et al.  The effect of polymer architecture on the nano self-assemblies based on novel comb-shaped amphiphilic poly(allylamine) , 2008 .

[71]  P. Sinko,et al.  Recent trends in targeted anticancer prodrug and conjugate design. , 2008, Current medicinal chemistry.

[72]  G. Hause,et al.  Hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl starch: synthesis, characterization, and aqueous self-assembly into nano-sized polymeric micelles and vesicles. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[73]  G. Escolar,et al.  Effects of polyethylene glycol and hydroxyethyl starch in University of Wisconsin preservation solution on human red blood cell aggregation and viscosity. , 2006, Transplantation proceedings.

[74]  Jayant Khandare,et al.  Polymer-drug conjugates: Progress in polymeric prodrugs , 2006 .

[75]  Nicholas Denko,et al.  Overcoming Physiologic Barriers to Cancer Treatment by Molecularly Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment , 2006, Molecular Cancer Research.

[76]  E. Balasse,et al.  Hydroxyethylstarch microcapsules: a preliminary study for tumor immunotherapy application. , 2006, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[77]  W. Kulicke,et al.  Improvements in Polysaccharides for use as Blood Plasma Expanders , 2005 .

[78]  Graeme Moad,et al.  Living radical polymerization by the RAFT process , 2005 .

[79]  P. Johnston,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[80]  Ruxandra Gref,et al.  Polysaccharide-decorated nanoparticles. , 2004, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[81]  Yadong Yin,et al.  Template‐Assisted Self‐Assembly of Spherical Colloids into Complex and Controllable Structures , 2003 .

[82]  C. Mélot,et al.  Plasma substitution effects of a new hydroxyethyl starch HES 130/0.4 compared with HES 200/0.5 during and after extended acute normovolaemic haemodilution. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.

[83]  J. Schulte am Esch,et al.  Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) 130/0.4 Provides Larger and Faster Increases in Tissue Oxygen Tension in Comparison with Prehemodilution Values than HES 70/0.5 or HES 200/0.5 in Volunteers Undergoing Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[84]  Ge Jiang,et al.  Preparation and in Vitro/in Vivo Evaluation of Insulin-Loaded Poly(Acryloyl-Hydroxyethyl Starch)-PLGA Composite Microspheres , 2003, Pharmaceutical Research.

[85]  Ge Jiang,et al.  Preparation and Characterization of a Composite PLGA and Poly(Acryloyl Hydroxyethyl Starch) Microsphere System for Protein Delivery , 2001, Pharmaceutical Research.

[86]  H. Büller,et al.  Decreased circulating levels of von Willebrand factor after intravenous administration of a rapidly degradable hydroxyethyl starch (HES 200/0.5/6) in healthy human subjects , 2001, Intensive Care Medicine.

[87]  S. Hudson,et al.  Review of vinyl graft copolymerization featuring recent advances toward controlled radical-based reactions and illustrated with chitin/chitosan trunk polymers. , 2001, Chemical reviews.

[88]  Alex Avdeef,et al.  Physicochemical Profiling (Solubility, Permeability and Charge State) , 2001 .

[89]  P. Coriat,et al.  Voluven®, a Lower Substituted Novel Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES 130/0.4), Causes Fewer Effects on Coagulation in Major Orthopedic Surgery than HES 200/0.5 , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[90]  J. Bertram,et al.  Molecular Biology of Cancer , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[91]  R. Strauss,et al.  An international view of hydroxyethyl starches , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[92]  B. Seifert,et al.  Compromised Blood Coagulation: An In Vitro Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 and Hydroxyethyl Starch 200/0.5 Using Thrombelastography , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[93]  M. James,et al.  In vivo investigation into the effects of haemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch (200/0.5) and normal saline on coagulation. , 1998, British journal of anaesthesia.

[94]  B. Ames,et al.  Environmental Pollution, Pesticides, and the Prevention of Cancer: Misconceptions 1 , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[95]  K. Schimrigk,et al.  HES 200/0.5 Is not HES 200/0.5 , 1995, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[96]  K. Hemminki,et al.  Cancer risk of air pollution: epidemiological evidence. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[97]  Hatem Fessi,et al.  Nanocapsule formation by interfacial polymer deposition following solvent displacement , 1989 .

[98]  H. Maeda,et al.  A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. , 1986, Cancer research.

[99]  R. Borch,et al.  Cyanohydridoborate anion as a selective reducing agent , 1971 .

[100]  Xiongbin Lu,et al.  Nanoparticle systems reduce systemic toxicity in cancer treatment. , 2016, Nanomedicine.

[101]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[102]  Y. Lvov,et al.  Biomedical applications of electrostatic layer-by-layer nano-assembly of polymers, enzymes, and nanoparticles , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[103]  J. Kopeček,et al.  Design of a multivalent galactoside ligand for selective targeting of HPMA copolymer-doxorubicin conjugates to human colon cancer cells. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[104]  G. Kwon,et al.  Polymeric micelles for delivery of poorly water-soluble compounds. , 2003, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.

[105]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[106]  A. Šebenik Living free-radical block copolymerization using thio-iniferters , 1998 .

[107]  D. Quintanar-Guerrero,et al.  Preparation techniques and mechanisms of formation of biodegradable nanoparticles from preformed polymers. , 1998, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[108]  R. Marchant,et al.  Interactions of plasma proteins with a novel polysaccharide surfactant physisorbed to polyethylene. , 1994, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[109]  J. Bertino,et al.  Karnofsky memorial lecture. Ode to methotrexate. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[110]  T. Sobue Association of indoor air pollution and lifestyle with lung cancer in Osaka, Japan. , 1990, International journal of epidemiology.

[111]  R. Attia,et al.  Studies on the kinetics of amyloglucosidase as affected by native and derivatized corn starch , 1984 .

[112]  K. El‐Sahy,et al.  Preparation and Evaluation of Hydroxyethyl Starch , 1982 .