In breast cancer screening, radiologists not only look at local properties of suspicious regions in the mammogram but take also into account more general contextual information. In this study we investigated the use of similar information for computer aided detection of malignant masses. We developed a new set of features that combine information from the candidate mass region and the whole image or mammogram. The developed context features were constructed to give information about suspiciousness of a region relative to other areas in the mammogram, the location in the image, the location in relation to dense tissue and the overall amount of dense tissue in the mammogram. We used a step-wise floating feature selection algorithm to select subsets from the set of available features. Feature selection was performed two times, once using the complete feature set (37 context and 40 local features) and once using only the local features. It was found that in the subsets selected from the complete feature set 30-60% were context features. At most one local feature present in the subset containing context features was not present in the subset without context features. We validated the performance of the selected subsets on a separate data set using cross validation and bootstrapping. For each subset size we compared the performance obtained using the features selected from the complete feature set to the performance obtained using the features selected from the local feature set. We found that subsets containing context features performed significantly better than feature sets containing no context features.
[1]
N Karssemeijer,et al.
Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms.
,
1998,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[2]
N. Karssemeijer,et al.
An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms1
,
2000,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[3]
Nico Karssemeijer,et al.
Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms
,
1999,
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[4]
Nico Karssemeijer,et al.
Feature selection for computer-aided detection: comparing different selection criteria
,
2008,
SPIE Medical Imaging.
[5]
Nico Karssemeijer,et al.
Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms
,
1996,
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.
[6]
Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.
Exponential Data Transformations
,
1976
.
[7]
N. Karssemeijer,et al.
A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography.
,
2004,
Medical physics.
[8]
Paul Sajda,et al.
Role of feature selection in building pattern recognizers for computer-aided diagnosis
,
1998,
Medical Imaging.
[9]
Nico Karssemeijer,et al.
Using context for mass detection and classification in mammograms
,
2005,
SPIE Medical Imaging.