Comparison Data Traffic Scheduling Techniques for Classifying QoS over 5G Mobile Networks

Enhancing Quality of Service (QoS) in mobilenetworks is the key aim for mobile operators. Mobile networkstransport several forms of data traffic for real-time applications(i.e., video monitoring). These applications need to get theadvantage of QoS adaptation. Numerous scheduling techniquesare utilized at the router to assure the QoS of the mobilenetworks. Upcoming 5G mobile networks will be launched, hence, Human-Type-Communication (HTC) and Machine-to-Machine (M2M) data traffic are expected to increasedramatically over mobile networks, which results in growing thecapacity and raising high data rates. These networks areexpected to face challenges in cases of Radio Access Network(RAN) overload and congestion due to the massive smart devicesdata traffic with various QoS requirements. This paper presentsa comparison for data traffic scheduling techniques, which arePriority Queuing (PQ), First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and WeightedFair Queuing (WFQ). We consider to select a suitable data trafficscheduling technique in terms of QoS provisioning and helping5G network, also we propose models and algorithms forefficiently utilized the smallest unit of a RAN in a relay node byaggregating and slicing the data traffic of several M2M devices.

[1]  Subbarayan Venkatesan,et al.  Remote subscription management of M2M terminals in 4G cellular wireless networks , 2012, 37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks - Workshops.

[2]  Evgenia Smirni,et al.  Trace data characterization and fitting for Markov modeling , 2010, Performance evaluation (Print).

[3]  W. Chin Emerging Technologies and Research Challenges for 5 G Wireless Networks , 2014 .

[4]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Service level agreements (SLAs) parameter negotiation between heterogeneous 4G wireless network operators , 2011, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[5]  Yaser Miaji,et al.  Comparative Simulation of Scheduling Mechanism in Packet Switching Network , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on Network Applications, Protocols and Services.

[6]  H. S. Mewara,et al.  Comparative Analysis of VOIP Application with Different Queuing Schemes in WiMAX Using OPNET , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology.

[7]  Zhong Fan,et al.  Emerging technologies and research challenges for 5G wireless networks , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[8]  Min Chen,et al.  Machine-to-Machine Communications: Architectures, Standards and Applications , 2012, KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst..

[9]  Gyu Myoung Lee,et al.  Smart Ubiquitous Networks for future telecommunication environments , 2014, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[10]  Salman AlQahtani,et al.  Comparing different LTE scheduling schemes , 2013, 2013 9th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC).

[11]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Survey of media access control protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks , 2011, IET Commun..

[12]  Kwang-Cheng Chen,et al.  Massive Access Management for QoS Guarantees in 3GPP Machine-to-Machine Communications , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  A. Annunziato 5G Vision: NGMN - 5G Initiative , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[14]  Hsiao-Hwa Chen,et al.  M2M Communications in 3GPP LTE/LTE-A Networks: Architectures, Service Requirements, Challenges, and Applications , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[15]  Zheng Wang,et al.  An Architecture for Differentiated Services , 1998, RFC.

[16]  Huaxin Zeng,et al.  Simulation and Analysis of Weighted Fair Queuing Algorithms in OPNET , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation.

[17]  Milos Tesanovic,et al.  mmWave-Based Mobile Access for 5G: Key Challenges and Projected Standards and Regulatory Roadmap , 2014, 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).